On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:21:14AM +1000, raf wrote:
> > > The FORWARD_SECRECY_README suggests regenerating the
> > > Postfix SMTP server EDH parameters periodically.
> > > Would doing so necessitate a postfix reload?
> >
> > No. The new parameters get picked up by new smtpd(8)
> > processes as
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:45:36AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> > On 22 Jul 2021, at 7:57 am, raf wrote:
> >
> > The FORWARD_SECRECY_README suggests regenerating the
> > Postfix SMTP server EDH parameters periodically.
> > Would doing so necessitate a postfix reload?
>
> No. The new
On 2021-07-22 23:47, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a problem with using DOVECOT sieve?
implement this in postfix prequeue smtp proxy mode ?, why did exim add
sieve to mta stage ?, hmm
i still search for why libmilter on gentoo is currently disabled, hope
its not a hidded secureity issue
Benny Pedersen:
> On 2021-07-22 20:29, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you're looking for an SMTP proxy with Sieve support, so that
> > you
> > can express simple rules on the message envelope, header and body. I
> > haven't looked, but I expect that such a beast can be found on GitHub,
>
On 2021-07-22 20:29, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Perhaps you're looking for an SMTP proxy with Sieve support, so that
you
can express simple rules on the message envelope, header and body. I
haven't looked, but I expect that such a beast can be found on GitHub,
or similar.
exim have sieve, so
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS]:
> OK
> local_recipient_maps =
> local_transport = error:local mail delivery is disabled
>
> then
>
> virtual_transport = lmtp:MDA:port ?
Sorry, there is not enough context to make a meaningful recommendation.
To deliver via virtual_transport,
On 2021-07-22 at 14:46:07 UTC-0400 (Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:46:07 -0400)
is rumored to have said:
>> The SMTP policy delegation service has access only to SMTP commands
>> and SMTP connection state, just like smtpd_mumble_restrictions, and
>> that will not change.
>
> Understood.
>
>
>> If you need
OK
local_recipient_maps =
local_transport = error:local mail delivery is disabled
then
virtual_transport = lmtp:MDA:port ?
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Noel Jones
Reply-To: "njo...@megan.vbhcs.org"
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 14:48
To:
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS]:
> Mail sent to the MTA wants to deliver to a local user on MTA rather
> than relaying to MDA. We get the ??User unknown in local recipient
> table? error, which makes sense. What are the configuration
> settings that we have obviously missed that will send
On 7/22/2021 1:46 PM, post...@ptld.com wrote:
If you need to see both SMTP commands/connections and message
content, use one of the approaches listed above. If there is no
ready-to-use implementation that meets your needs, Milters can be
implemented in python, perl, rust, java, php, C, and
OK. Blank the "mydestination"
Anything else ?
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of Wietse Venema
Reply-To: Postfix users
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 14:45
To: Postfix users
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: How do I tell a relay to relay ?
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS]:
On 7/22/2021 1:35 PM, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS] wrote:
Server 1 - MTA - Relay only - Postfix, Amavis, Spamassassin, Clam AV - No local
or virtual mail users on this server.
Server 2 - MDA - Where the Mailboxes Live - Postfix, Dovecot, RoundCube,
PostfixAdmin - All mail users are
The SMTP policy delegation service has access only to SMTP commands
and SMTP connection state, just like smtpd_mumble_restrictions, and
that will not change.
Understood.
If you need to see both SMTP commands/connections and message
content, use one of the approaches listed above. If there is
More detail, please, about transport rules.
From: jeroen
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 14:44
To: Daniel White
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: How do I tell a relay to relay ?
Make sure mydestination is set to empty, and configure transport rules to
deliver to your mda.
Oorspronkelijk
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS]:
> Server 1 - MTA - Relay only - Postfix, Amavis, Spamassassin, Clam AV - No
> local or virtual mail users on this server.
> Server 2 - MDA - Where the Mailboxes Live - Postfix, Dovecot, RoundCube,
> PostfixAdmin - All mail users are virtual.
>
> Mail sent to
On 07-22-2021 2:29 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Perhaps you're lookin for an SMTP proxy with Sieve support, so that you
can express simple rules on the message envelope, header and body. I
haven't looked, but I expect that such a beast can be found on github,
or similar.
Thanks for the tidbit
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On 22 Jul 2021, at 12:33 pm, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> >
> > Is there any chance of the policy server in the future adding a feature to
> > include the mail body in the attributes?
>
> No. If you want to inspect the body prior to accepting the message into
> the queue, use
Server 1 - MTA - Relay only - Postfix, Amavis, Spamassassin, Clam AV - No local
or virtual mail users on this server.
Server 2 - MDA - Where the Mailboxes Live - Postfix, Dovecot, RoundCube,
PostfixAdmin - All mail users are virtual.
Mail sent to the MTA wants to deliver to a local user on MTA
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 02:19:23PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> And im not a fan of proxy filter, it feels like an expensive and
> cumbersome work around solution.
The SMTP engine is easy to implement, and only has to be written once.
You can probably find existing ones to which you can add
Is there any chance of the policy server in the future adding a
feature to include the mail body in the attributes?
No. If you want to inspect the body prior to accepting the message
into
the queue, use the existing smtpd_proxy_filter and/or milter features.
That is unfortunate. I was
> On 22 Jul 2021, at 12:33 pm, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> Is there any chance of the policy server in the future adding a feature to
> include the mail body in the attributes?
No. If you want to inspect the body prior to accepting the message into
the queue, use the existing
Is there any chance of the policy server in the future adding a feature
to include the mail body in the attributes?
A setting in main.cf:enable_policy_body=yes to include or not include
the body for those who don't need/want the extra data sent.
Maybe also separate out body vs attachment
> On 22 Jul 2021, at 7:57 am, raf wrote:
>
> The FORWARD_SECRECY_README suggests regenerating the
> Postfix SMTP server EDH parameters periodically.
> Would doing so necessitate a postfix reload?
No. The new parameters get picked up by new smtpd(8)
processes as old ones exit after handling
Hi,
The FORWARD_SECRECY_README suggests regenerating the
Postfix SMTP server EDH parameters periodically.
Would doing so necessitate a postfix reload?
cheers,
raf
24 matches
Mail list logo
