On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:05:10PM +1300, Peter via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On 25/03/23 11:50, raf via Postfix-users wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 09:11:58AM +1300, Peter via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > > * Don't add a Reply-To:. I actually question if this is really needed as
> >
Aosars Repository via Postfix-users writes:
> Hi all,
> I have installed postfix on Ubuntu server 22 and configured to use gmail
> smtp.But it fails to send mails.
> Can some share with me a step by step guide on installation and
> configuration.
At first, as Ralf already mentioned, make
Explained it badly, but this is what I meant.
Regards,
Elisamuel Resto
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 15:50, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Dnia 26.03.2023 o godz. 13:27:48 Elisamuel Resto via Postfix-users pisze:
>> DKIM/SPF/DMARC were created to work with legitimate mail and to help
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 04:10:57PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
> > The suggested inline:{{key = value}} replacement will work if
> > implemented correctly.
>
> Mar 26 15:42:30 mail postfix/smtpd[15243]: NOQUEUE: reject:
> RCPT from mx4.messageprovider.com[156.55.193.213]: 450
-- Doug
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 15:04, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:53:42PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>>> inline:{{digitalinsight.firefightersfirstcreditunion.org =
>>> permit_auth_destination}}
>>> or
>>>
>>>
Dnia 26.03.2023 o godz. 14:53:42 Doug Hardie via Postfix-users pisze:
> check_sender_access hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
[...]
> the contents of access:
>
> # Firefighters CU has missing DNS
> 156.55.193.213 OK
This will not match for "check_sender_access". For this
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 22:48:
Dnia 26.03.2023 o godz. 13:27:48 Elisamuel Resto via Postfix-users
pisze:
DKIM/SPF/DMARC were created to work with legitimate mail and to help
detect (and possibly reject) mail that is forged or modified by a
third party. That is what
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:53:42PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >inline:{{digitalinsight.firefightersfirstcreditunion.org =
> > permit_auth_destination}}
> > or
> >
> > inline:{digitalinsight.firefightersfirstcreditunion.org=permit_auth_destination}
> >
> > Per the documentation:
> >
>
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 14:27, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:15:27PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> Thanks Viktor. I went with the first approach and am getting errors:
>>
>> warning:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:15:27PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
> Thanks Viktor. I went with the first approach and am getting errors:
>
> warning: inline:{DigitalInsight.firefightersfirstcreditunion.org =
> permit_auth_destination} is unavailable. missing '=' after attribute
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 13:28, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 12:52:01PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> I don't want to remove the "reject_unknown_sender_domain" function as
>> it gets used properly a lot. Is there some way I can get
Dnia 26.03.2023 o godz. 13:27:48 Elisamuel Resto via Postfix-users pisze:
> DKIM/SPF/DMARC were created to work with legitimate mail and to help
> detect (and possibly reject) mail that is forged or modified by a
> third party. That is what mailing lists do.
But they were never designed with
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 12:52:01PM -0700, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users wrote:
> I don't want to remove the "reject_unknown_sender_domain" function as
> it gets used properly a lot. Is there some way I can get postfix to
> accept these for local delivery?
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
I have a specific email sender that is getting the error "Sender addresses
rejected: Domain not found". Sure enough DNS provides no response for that
domain. If I drop off the first part of the domain name, then DNS returns a
response. However, the organization is using the complete name
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 12:13:55PM -0700, Amit Gupta via Postfix-users wrote:
> Hello, according to the docs, when there is a "high volume" of mail in the
> active queue, then a connection is added to the cache, How is "high
> volume" determined? Below is the quote from the documentation:
>
>
Elisamuel Resto via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 20:27:
No mailing list that does mangling will do DKIM properly UNLESS, as
suggested before, mail is signed by the ML server after mangled.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,
Hello, according to the docs, when there is a "high volume" of mail in the
active queue, then a connection is added to the cache, How is "high
volume" determined? Below is the quote from the documentation:
"On-demand connection caching. This is enabled by default, and is
controlled with the
On 2023-03-26 12:37 am, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 06:15:
DKIM and ARC signatures need to be checked right after the message is
received,
not really, all that is needed is to frezze stata of dkim, arc, dmarc
at recieve state, when
On 26/03/23 18:37, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 06:15:
DKIM and ARC signatures need to be checked right after the message is
received,
not really, all that is needed is to frezze stata of dkim, arc, dmarc at
recieve state,
which
On 24.03.23 13:55, Arrigo Triulzi via Postfix-users wrote:
I am trying to migrate my personal Sendmail setup (five domains) to Postfix and
I am not entirely sure how to replicate what I have at the moment.
Each domain has a different server and each of them acts as secondary for the
other
Peter via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-26 01:05:
Mailman has a setting that addresses this, reply_goes_to_list.
According to mm docs, this adds the original From: address as a CC
On 26.03.23 01:55, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
there will be a day when mailman dont sink ships, so
21 matches
Mail list logo
