natan via Postfix-users:
> 1.
> FROM is encoded as "FRIENDLY_NAME " == encoding ==> "base64"
That form is NOT VALID. For proper encoding, please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2047#section-5
> 2.
> FROM is encoded as "FRIENDLY_NAME " == encoding ==>
> "base64 "
That form is
Richard Raether via Postfix-users:
> Should I take out thee always_bcc in main.cf? Would this solution also
> allow everything else to be BCC'd? Allsoo what would the line be if
> "lists" were not in the domain name. I'm not familliar with the syntax.
Use always_bcc if you want to copy all
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:06:12AM -0500, Noel Jones via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Surely the generalisation is:
> >
> >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
> >cidr:{
> > {if 0.0.0.0/0}
> > # Private IPv4 addresses
> > {!10.0.0.0/8
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 03:20:23PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
cidr:{ {!10/8 silent-discard,dsn} }
On 23.02.24 11:12, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
But that does not
On 3/21/2024 10:21 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 03:20:23PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
cidr:{ {!10/8 silent-discard,dsn} }
On 23.02.24 11:12,
Should I take out thee always_bcc in main.cf? Would this solution also
allow everything else to be BCC'd? Allsoo what would the line be if
"lists" were not in the domain name. I'm not familliar with the syntax.
Excuse. my ignorance,
Richard
On 3/21/24 8:54 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 03:20:23PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> > > smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps =
> > > cidr:{ {!10/8 silent-discard,dsn} }
>
> On 23.02.24 11:12, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > But
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder if this is possible:
>
> If a PCRE/regexp style map is triggering, it can be quite hard to
> find out WHICH pattern actually caused the action.
>
> So maybe postmap (when invoked with "-b", "-h" or "-q key") could emit
> which regular
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> as I maintain some mail gateways with postfix, I would like to discard the
> DSN ehlo keyword, from all hosts but internal network.
>
> I see that with smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps
> "Tables will be searched in the specified order until a
Richard Raether via Postfix-users:
> We have an auditor account where all incoming and outgoing mail is BCC'd
> to, to retain for compliance reasons. However, since mailman retains its
> own archives, and we have a mailman on a separate server with a separate
> domain, is there a way to tell
Thank you so much for the reply, and thanks so much for Postfix, which I’ve
used for many years.
If I continue using QMQP I’ll gather more definitive proof; but it sounds like
(a) I have a bug in my QMQP protocol handler (likely); and/or (b) I’m using
QMQP in a way it wasn’t designed
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Brad Koehn via Postfix-users:
> > I'm trying to deliver email with Postfix 3.7.10 using `qmqpd`.
> > Unfortunately when I do this, the email is often unreadable by a
> > variety of email clients.
>
> I suppose you mean "receive" mail with Postfix using qmqpd.
>
Brad Koehn via Postfix-users:
> I'm trying to deliver email with Postfix 3.7.10 using `qmqpd`.
> Unfortunately when I do this, the email is often unreadable by a
> variety of email clients.
I suppose you mean "receive" mail with Postfix using qmqpd.
> Curiously, if I deliver the same email
13 matches
Mail list logo
