Hi,
I really hope there is a solution.
I have been using postfix and dspam. However, /var became full. After
looking into the problem, I found that /var/dspam/data was where all
the disk space was being used. After deleting /var/dspam/data /var
was almost empty. Well, I then created
On Oct 28, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/28/2015 6:41 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
I really hope there is a solution.
I have been using postfix and dspam. However, /var became full.
After looking into the problem, I found that /var/dspam/data was
where all the disk space was being
Hi,
I really hope that someone can help me on this list. I spent hours
googling and hours installing webmail clients. Still, I was not able
to find one that I like. The only one that I could get working was
squirrel mail. They all seem to have too long of a list of
dependencies, but I
Hi,
On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/11/2015 3:13 PM, Al Zick wrote:
...
I don't know anything about dspam, but I have some comments on your
postfix configuration.
If I integrate it into my postfix's master.cf, dspam doesn't crash
anymore, but I have greater problems
Hi,
I really hope that someone can help me.
I know that some of this may be off topic for this list, but some of
this has to directly deal with my postfix master.cf.
The goal is to provide the same filtering for everyone who receives
email on this system.
I have a mail server that is a
On Jun 18, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Rod K wrote:
If the local postfix instance isn't handling anything else (or even
if it is) the easiest solution would probably be to configure it to
relay
Hello,
I setup procmail. I have a system wide config:
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
VERBOSE=on
:0B:
* (://[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.ru)
/dev/null
:0:
* ^Subject: (Rolex)
/dev/null
:0
* ^Subject: (anoncvs)
! m...@server1.com some...@server2.com
I checked the log and it is putting spam in /dev/null,
On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2012-08-07 Al Zick wrote:
I setup procmail. I have a system wide config:
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
VERBOSE=on
:0B:
* (://[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.ru)
/dev/null
:0:
* ^Subject: (Rolex)
/dev/null
:0
* ^Subject: (anoncvs)
! m...@server1.com
Hi,
On Jan 13, 2012, at 5:52 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Friday 13 January 2012 16:57:21 Al Zick wrote:
On Jan 12, 2012, at 3:57 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
Apart from this if you use some trustable RBL, perhaps
^
greylisting and you
Hi,
On Jan 12, 2012, at 3:57 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 1/11/2012 11:15 PM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
For a while we ran Qmail. Qmail would accept all emails regardless,
creating a very serious backscatter problem. Of course, switching
Hi,
For a while we ran Qmail. Qmail would accept all emails regardless,
creating a very serious backscatter problem. Of course, switching to
Postfix with it configured to only accept emails for our recipients
fixed this problem. Still we seem to be losing the war with spam. I
whitelisted
I know I don't have a back scater problem.
Hi,
We have been using the same mail server for a long time with the same
IP. It relays the email for several webservers and of course all of
our email. Yet, lately (maybe the last month or so) I have been
getting a lot of complaints about their emails not being delivered
and sending the
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 7:02 PM, Al Zick wrote:
Is there a replacement for procmail? I know it seemed to take
longer and did raise cpu usage, but when I first installed it
with bogofilter, it almost eliminated spam getting into my inbox.
depends
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 10:37 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
I hope that someone can help me. Last night I had a strange
problem. Every email that came in was there twice. Emails that
I would normally get 2 copies of, I received 4 copies of. Any
ideas
Hi Noel,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 4:44 PM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/27/2010 10:37 AM, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
Turn off verbose logging. That may help your CPU usage too.
ok.
Not likely. A broken alias
Hi,
sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several
years and
are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for
them.
So there is problem with false-positives. There are not much of them,
but all cases needs additional investigation.
I removed several
17 matches
Mail list logo
