, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
so I tried this:
/^([^._\/-]*)[._\/-](.*)@arix\.com$/ ${1}+$...@arix.com
Unfortunately, this causes Postfix to accept mail for non-existent
recipients (the virtual alias matches a bogus of username portion,
and Postfix discovers only upon delivery
On Sep 27, 2009, at 12:53 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 0:53, Erick Calder e...@arix.com wrote:
if the message were for no-ex...@arix.com then it gets rerouted to n...@arix.com
which also doesn't exist and therefor bounces.
Yes, it bounces. This makes you a backacatter source
On Sep 27, 2009, at 1:03 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Erick Calder wrote:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 12:53 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 0:53, Erick Calder e...@arix.com wrote:
if the message were for no-ex...@arix.com then it gets rerouted
to n...@arix.com which
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:12, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
wrote:
On 9/24/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:$config_directory/virtual
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
pcre:$config_directory/virtual_sql.pcre,
thank you guys for taking the time to explain things. I see why it's
an issue.
On Sep 27, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2009-09-27 Erick Calder wrote:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 1:03 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Erick Calder wrote:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 12:53 AM
, LuKreme wrote:
On 25-Sep-2009, at 19:49, Erick Calder wrote:
do I understand it correctly that when a message arrives with an
address like ekkis_j...@arix.com you convert it to ekkis+j...@arix.com
?
Exactly.
if so, would you share your pcre? this I would really like to do
because a lot
On Sep 26, 2009, at 12:30 PM, mouss wrote:
snip
== virtual_alias_maps:
/^(joe|jim|jane)-(.*)@(example\.net|example\.com)$/$1...@$3
this converts joe-...@example.com to joe+...@example.com
If you don't want to generate the file (and update it when you add
users), you can use mysql or
On Sep 25, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
Everybody seems to use recipient delimiters. I wonder if there's a
standard
that specifies a recipient delimiter functionality or did it just
appear one
day and people adopted it without a spec or anything.
Anybody
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
sign
in an e-mail address... is there a way to have a character bag work
as
the delimiter
On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
this brings to mind: I've long used plussed addresses and love that
feature but my only complaint is that many systems disallow the +
sign
in an e-mail address
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
snip
You can't replace the delimiter. That would break other people's
transit mail, among many things.
I'm not sure I understand... perhaps we're speaking of 2 different
On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:01 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 24-Sep-2009, at 15:34, Erick Calder wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Erick Calder wrote:
I've been asking at the google groups mailing list with no
results so I
figure I'd
On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If Postfix announces a size limit of X, many SMTP clients won't
attempt to send larger messages, and Postfix won't accept a larger
message (and thus Postfix will not generate a bounce email message).
If you must configure Postfix to accept
13 matches
Mail list logo
