> Does anyone know of any open source implementations of ETSI's
> "Registered Email" standard (ETSI TS 102 640)? I think this is
> different than Italy's "Certified Email" (RFC 6109).
Is this on anyone's radar? Is there a better place to discuss?
Greetings,
Does anyone know of any open source implementations of ETSI's
"Registered Email" standard (ETSI TS 102 640)? I think this is
different than Italy's "Certified Email" (RFC 6109).
I had a quick search of the archives, but nothing came up at all, and
Google searches don't turn up
On 2/10/14, Michal Bruncko michal.brun...@zssos.sk wrote:
* A custom smtpd instance listening on the loopback interface on port
10025
as you can see from you policy posted at the end of your post - you can
simply allow postfix to bind to port 10025 using command:
setsebool -P
I have Postfix running on CentOS 6 with SELinux in enforcing targeted
mode. By default, SELinux will block the following two components of
my system:
* A custom smtpd instance listening on the loopback interface on port 10025
* Using Postfix virtual as the delivery agent to maildirs that are not
Using:
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
(so only want opportunistic encryption, no cert validation, etc) the
TLS_README suggests that it's best to just leave blank
smtpd_tls_cert_file
smtpd_tls_key_file
smtp_tls_CAfile/path
Question: so then does Postfix use some kind of internally generated
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:06:22AM -0800, Ori Bani wrote:
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
(so only want opportunistic encryption, no cert validation, etc) the
TLS_README suggests that it's best to just leave
smtp_tls_CAfile
As for this, you typically don't need it and can leave it blank.
Same goes for smtp_tls_CApath I presume
Thanks again
This text is about CLIENT certificates, that is:
smtp_tls_cert_file
smtp_tls_key_file
You're making a concerted effort
Why do you say something like this?
to confuse these with SERVER certificates,
that is:
smtpd_tls_cert_file
smtpd_tls_key_file
Based
I'm curious, if you have a smtpd service in master.cf that listens on
an IP address, if it would be possible to restrict the recipient maps
just to the recipients in the domain associated with that IP address
(there are other smtpd services/domains/IP addresses on the same
postfix instance).
I
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/14/2012 5:14 AM, Ori Bani wrote:
I'm curious, if you have a smtpd service in master.cf that listens on
an IP address, if it would be possible to restrict the recipient maps
just to the recipients in the domain
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Ori Bani:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/14/2012 5:14 AM, Ori Bani wrote:
I'm curious, if you have a smtpd service in master.cf that listens on
an IP address
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Ori Bani orib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Ori Bani:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/14/2012 5:14 AM, Ori Bani wrote:
I'm curious, if you have
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Ori Bani:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Ori Bani:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
I read somewhere on this list that it's not necessary to use proxymap
for transport table lookups.
I guess that the assumption is the transport table is so small, making
it unnecessary?
The proxymap manpage says one of its main purposes is to consolidate
connections to databases amongst various
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Marty Beckler:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
disabled without specifying the next hop?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Marty Beckler wrote:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
Hello,
Questions about address verification:
I don't quite understand the difference between
address_verify_negative_expire_time and
address_verify_negative_refresh_time. If an address needs to be
refreshed anyway, does it make any difference whether or not it was
expired? What use is the
Questions about address verification:
I don't quite understand the difference between
address_verify_negative_expire_time and
address_verify_negative_refresh_time. If an address needs to be
refreshed anyway, does it make any difference whether or not it was
expired? What use is the expire
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:11:57AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I recently saw Exim reject/not deliver mail based on this old, expired draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
What ever
Hello Ralf,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Marcus Mülbüsch muelbue...@as-infodienste.de:
Hello all,
is it possible to configure postfix in a way that it forwards
incoming mails to an external mail-server, but in a way that only the
Thank you for the reply and sorry for the delay in responding.
I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
the emails),
I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
the emails), although I could move that to another partition if need
be.
Anyone
Hi,
I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
the emails), although I could move that to another partition if need
be.
Anyone
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.0.html]
Postfix stable release 2.9.0 is available. The main changes in no
particular order are:
Does
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements
2012/2/1 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml a écrit :
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 23:01 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 01.02.2012 22:56, schrieb Ori Bani:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
[An on-line
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Simon Brereton
simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2012 11:20 PM, ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 19:30 -0800, Ori Bani a écrit :
2012/2/1 ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 03:13 +0100, ml
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Ori Bani orib...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I'm curious to get feedback on the idea of mounting all the postfix
queue directories on a faster media (SSD drive in this case).
In my case, I have virtual maildirs
Hello,
I'm curious to get feedback on the idea of mounting all the postfix
queue directories on a faster media (SSD drive in this case).
In my case, I have virtual maildirs under /var/spool/postfix and those
would be relocated to elsewhere (onto slower normal media) because the
faster (SSD)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:16:34PM -0800, Ori Bani wrote:
I am evaluating a potential move of a mail server from a dedicated
server to a cloud-based server instance. I am trying to research
the cons (I am comfortable
Hello,
I am evaluating a potential move of a mail server from a dedicated
server to a cloud-based server instance. I am trying to research the
cons (I am comfortable with the pros) of doing so.
From what I can tell, we have to consider possible performance issues
(e.g., I/O contention),
31 matches
Mail list logo
