If it can not be done at
the moment, all right (I found a similar request in 2006 - message
209338).
My real problem is this:
Many customers use mail groups (virtual_alias_maps). Each
destination account can create their own rules for releasing and
blocking, which is consulted by the
Guys, I'm still accepting
ideas. :D
Gustav Meirinho escreveu:
If it can not be done
at
the moment, all right (I found a similar request in 2006 - message
209338).
My real problem is this:
Many customers use mail groups (virtual_alias_maps). Each
destination account can
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 04:19:18PM -0200, Gustav Meirinho wrote:
How can I integrate the XForward command with PDP, to have more
complete information of an envelope, regardless of the instance used?
WTF PDP? Even if we knew what PDP was, this question is way too concise.
Please explain your
WTF PDP?
Policy delegation protocol, I suppose.
Mark
Mark Martinec:
WTF PDP?
Policy delegation protocol, I suppose.
Confirmed (I referred him to the mailing list, and have no
more information than what has already been posted).
Wietse
LOL!
Sorry. PDP = Postfix Delegation Protocol.
If postfix has XForward support, why not to send xforward
information to delegation protocol?
Only a doubt, not a real problem.
Thanks again and sorry about the mess.
Gustav.
Udo Rader escreveu:
-BEGIN
PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 02:55:07PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Martinec:
WTF PDP?
Policy delegation protocol, I suppose.
Confirmed (I referred him to the mailing list, and have no
more information than what has already been posted).
Then perhaps the question is about expanding
Exactly the opposite.
This would be the desired response in "PDP":
request=smtpd_access_policy
protocol_state=RCPT
protocol_name=SMTP
helo_name=some.domain.tld
queue_id=8045F2AB23
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
recipient_count=0
client_address=1.2.3.4
client_name=another.domain.tld
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 02:55:07PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Martinec:
WTF PDP?
Policy delegation protocol, I suppose.
Confirmed (I referred him to the mailing list, and have no
more information than what has already been posted).
Then perhaps the
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Victor Duchovni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:47:08PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
This thread suggests that each xforward attribute also needs to be
made available via Milter macros (in smtpd and cleanup), and via
the policy delegation
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:47:08PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
This thread suggests that each xforward attribute also needs to be
made available via Milter macros (in smtpd and cleanup), and via
the policy delegation protocol.
There seems to be some demand for this,
11 matches
Mail list logo