Re: problem with smtp and ssl

2011-11-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.11.2011 08:02, schrieb Chantal Rosmuller: On 11/21/2011 01:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Chantal Rosmuller: Why do you use this: smtps inet n - n - - smtpd And not this: #submission inet n - - - - smtpd Wietse I changed it and changed the

Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Mark Goodge
I am suffering from AOL numpties who click this is spam on notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up a feedback loop with AOL so that I'm notified when anybody does that. However, AOL's feedback

Re: problem with smtp and ssl

2011-11-22 Thread Chantal Rosmuller
Op 22-11-2011 9:12, Reindl Harald schreef: Am 22.11.2011 08:02, schrieb Chantal Rosmuller: On 11/21/2011 01:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Chantal Rosmuller: Why do you use this: smtps inet n - n - - smtpd And not this: #submission inet n - - - - smtpd

Re: problem with smtp and ssl

2011-11-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.11.2011 11:57, schrieb Chantal Rosmuller: Op 22-11-2011 9:12, Reindl Harald schreef: Am 22.11.2011 08:02, schrieb Chantal Rosmuller: On 11/21/2011 01:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Chantal Rosmuller: Why do you use this: smtps inet n - n - - smtpd And not this: #submission

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:51:27 + Mark Goodge articulated: I am suffering from AOL numpties who click this is spam on notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up a feedback loop with AOL so that I'm

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk: I am suffering from AOL numpties who click this is spam on notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up a feedback loop with AOL so that I'm notified when anybody

Re: local and rermote delivery for the same domain(s)

2011-11-22 Thread Panagiotis Drakopoulos
On 17/11/2011 02:05 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote: Panagiotis Drakopoulos: Hi, I would like to know if the following scenario is possible with postfix: We have a mailing list server list.domain.com . my mailing lists have names of the forms m...@domain.com and m...@subdomain.domain.com. All

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Mark Goodge: I am suffering from AOL numpties who click this is spam on notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up a feedback loop with AOL so that I'm notified when anybody does that. However,

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Mark Goodge
On 22/11/2011 13:20, Wietse Venema wrote: Mark Goodge: What I'd like to do, therefore, is set a header via Postfix. But I am having difficulty working out how to do that, or even if it's possible. First, you must send one recipient per message, otherwise you still won't know who the

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 11/22/2011 6:35 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk: I am suffering from AOL numpties who click this is spam on notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I've set up a feedback

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Mark Goodge: On 22/11/2011 13:20, Wietse Venema wrote: Mark Goodge: What I'd like to do, therefore, is set a header via Postfix. But I am having difficulty working out how to do that, or even if it's possible. Wietse: [prepending recipient header at SMTP time]. Or use VERP, as others

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
In regards to the OP's issue for this case, AOL also will obfuscate a VERP address in its report. Not enough :) On python.org I still can identify the original recipients. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Wolfgang Zeikat
In an older episode, on 2011-11-22 11:51, Mark Goodge wrote: However, AOL's feedback system removes the recipient email address, so I can't identify the complainer from the report. It does not remove your server's header lines though, including message-ID and postfix queue ids, so you can

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Wolfgang Zeikat wolfgang.zei...@desy.de: In an older episode, on 2011-11-22 11:51, Mark Goodge wrote: However, AOL's feedback system removes the recipient email address, so I can't identify the complainer from the report. It does not remove your server's header lines though, including

Chinese characters

2011-11-22 Thread Tolga
Hi, Our mail server is getting A LOT of Chinese spam e-mails. How can I block these? In fact, how do I block e-mail with Chinese characters in Subject? Thanks,

Re: Chinese characters

2011-11-22 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Tolga to...@ozses.net wrote: Hi, Our mail server is getting A LOT of Chinese spam e-mails. How can I block these? In fact, how do I block e-mail with Chinese characters in Subject? Thanks, spamassassin or something similar would help you out with that;

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Mark Goodge
On 22/11/2011 14:03, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote: In an older episode, on 2011-11-22 11:51, Mark Goodge wrote: However, AOL's feedback system removes the recipient email address, so I can't identify the complainer from the report. It does not remove your server's header lines though, including

Re: Problem with domain being listed in virtual domain and relay_domain

2011-11-22 Thread /dev/rob0
On Monday 21 November 2011 23:22:00 Alex wrote: I have a postfix-2.8 server running on fedora15 with a few virtual domains, and can't figure out how one of my domains is listed twice. Nov 22 00:07:46 portal postfix/trivial-rewrite[26271]: warning: do not list domain example.com in BOTH

Re: multiple content filters, a sanity check

2011-11-22 Thread Simon Brereton
On 21 November 2011 19:33, David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm running Postfix 2.8 and virtual mailbox domains with a mysql database. I've also got spf and dkim signatures going as well as clamsmtp as an smtp proxy for virus checking. I'd now like to add in dspam antispam

Re: Adding a dynamic header to all mail passing through Postfix

2011-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: You can use the smtpd_command_filter feature to append XVERP to SMTP commands from legacy sofware. This requires Postfix 2.7 or later. /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_command_filter = pcre:/etc/postfix/append_verp.pcre smtpd_authorized_verp_clients =

Re: multiple content filters, a sanity check

2011-11-22 Thread Simon Brereton
On 22 November 2011 11:52, David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/22/11, Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote: On 21 November 2011 19:33, David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm running Postfix 2.8 and virtual mailbox domains with a mysql database. I've

Re: dict_nis_init: NIS domain name not set

2011-11-22 Thread Bjorn Mork
Thanks Wietse... Warning message is no more in logs Regards BMork

Postfix and MIMEdefang; per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment

2011-11-22 Thread Rolf E. Sonneveld
Hi, all, running Postfix 2.8.6 in combination with MIMEdefang (MD) 2.72. What I want to achieve is the following: the combination Postfix + MD should provide per-user anti-spam functionality. In itself this is not a big problem, but the real problem here is: how to do this for messages which

Re: Postfix and MIMEdefang; per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment

2011-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Rolf E. Sonneveld: Hi, all, running Postfix 2.8.6 in combination with MIMEdefang (MD) 2.72. What I want to achieve is the following: the combination Postfix + MD should provide per-user anti-spam functionality. In itself this is not a big problem, but the real problem here is: how to do

RE: Postfix and MIMEdefang; per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment

2011-11-22 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:23 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Postfix and MIMEdefang; per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment

Re: Postfix and MIMEdefang; per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment

2011-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse: [Splitting one inbound SMTP transaction into multiple sendmail command-line submissions, in real time] This is not reliable. If one recipient mail transaction fails (no disk space or whatever) then you must report a tempfail error to the remote SMTP client. Later, the SMTP client will

RE: Postfix and MIMEdefang; per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment

2011-11-22 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 4:50 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Postfix and MIMEdefang; per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment

Re: Per-Recipient Data Responses (was: ... per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment)

2011-11-22 Thread Claus Assmann
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011, Wietse Venema wrote: It's a shame http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt or something like it never went anywhere. It is surprising, considering that there is experience with per-recipient data replies in LMTP, and that it is straightforward to implement

Re: Per-Recipient Data Responses (was: ... per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment)

2011-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Claus Assmann: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011, Wietse Venema wrote: It's a shame http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt or something like it never went anywhere. It is surprising, considering that there is experience with per-recipient data replies in LMTP, and that it is

Re: Per-Recipient Data Responses (was: ... per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment)

2011-11-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:30:49PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: I just stubled across this thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/90005 We could take a bold step and do it in two main stream MTAs, damn the torpedoes. Is it worth the effort? Will enough SMTP clients

Re: Problem with domain being listed in virtual domain and relay_domain

2011-11-22 Thread Alex
Hi, I've cut out much ... smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem smtpd_tls_received_header = yes smtpd_tls_security_level = may smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/lib/postfix/smtpd_tls_session_cache

Re: Per-Recipient Data Responses (was: ... per-recipient treatment of messages in a milter environment)

2011-11-22 Thread Claus Assmann
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:30:49PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: I just stubled across this thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/90005 We could take a bold step and do it in two main stream MTAs, damn the torpedoes.