Hello
I have problem with sendmail -bs from postfix 2.9.0. It is killed by
segmentation fault when it is called by for example pine.
More precisely /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd is killed after reading MAIL FROM:
Log from this event:
Feb 16 18:45:34 main postfix/smtpd[15966]: connect from
Have a nice day.
I've one postfix on Debian Squeeze that works fine.
I'd like now to mount an other postif on an other Squeeze, that will simulate
my ISP (I'm teacher).
Then, my first postix will become a relay and will send mails to my ISP
Postfix.
I'm not able to find informations about
bszx-post...@bszx.eu.org:
Hello
I have problem with sendmail -bs from postfix 2.9.0. It is killed by
segmentation fault when it is called by for example pine.
More precisely /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd is killed after reading MAIL FROM:
Thanks, this patch is correct.
The bug was introduced
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:17:35PM +, Jean Brico wrote:
I've one postfix on Debian Squeeze that works fine.
I'd like now to mount an other postif on an other Squeeze, that
will simulate my ISP (I'm teacher).
Then, my first postix will become a relay and will send mails to
my ISP
Hello all,
here is my problem:
I have several hosting servers, sending mails from authenticated users,
web scripts, web pages, and so on... I cannot monitor everything, and
our greatest problem is outgoing unauthorized mails. we experience
10'000 mails spam campaigns every week or so... No
Am 17.02.2012 17:00, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Hello all,
here is my problem:
I have several hosting servers, sending mails from authenticated users, web
scripts, web pages, and so on... I
cannot monitor everything, and our greatest problem is outgoing unauthorized
mails. we
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 08:41:31AM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El 16/02/12 16:35, Viktor Dukhovni escribi?:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:49:10AM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
If your LDAP tables contain no bare (just the local part) address
lookup keys, you may consider using %u@%d instead of
Le 17. 02. 12 17:06, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 17.02.2012 17:00, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Hello all,
here is my problem:
I have several hosting servers, sending mails from authenticated users, web
scripts, web pages, and so on... I
cannot monitor everything, and our greatest problem is
Am 17.02.2012 18:31, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Okay... perhaps I explained it poorly, or did I actually not understood a
word of your explaination...
The case I cannot detect is:
SENDER (a...@toto.com) sends an email to b...@domain.com
||
v
WEBSERVER (b...@domain.com forwards
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:35:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2012 18:31, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
SENDER (a...@toto.com) sends an email to b...@domain.com
||
v
WEBSERVER (b...@domain.com forwards all mails to b...@yahoo.com)
||
v
MAIL GATEWAY (local domains:
Le 17. 02. 12 18:35, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 17.02.2012 18:31, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Okay... perhaps I explained it poorly, or did I actually not understood a word
of your explaination...
The case I cannot detect is:
SENDER (a...@toto.com) sends an email to b...@domain.com
||
v
Am 17.02.2012 18:41, schrieb Toni Mueller:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:35:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2012 18:31, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
SENDER (a...@toto.com) sends an email to b...@domain.com
||
v
WEBSERVER (b...@domain.com forwards all mails to b...@yahoo.com)
||
v
Am 17.02.2012 18:48, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Okay, the webserver is a Plesk server where users can set an email
redirection to their external address. I don't
know why, but many users do that.
i am out here because i never use such software using server
configuartions natevily all of the
Simon Hintermann:
[restricting the sender address from webmail apps with an SMTP
sender access table]
Now I get a warning in my logs every time a potentially unauthorized
mails goes out.
But I can't have any visibility over redirected mails. We've got several
users that configure their
We need to ensure that emails sent by some of our users are encrypted
(medical records, reports, etc) before they are sent.
We only accept out going mail from our local users by submission (port
587).
I realize that this is really the job of the MUA, but I would like to
check that emails
Le 17. 02. 12 19:02, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 17.02.2012 18:48, schrieb Simon Hintermann:
Okay, the webserver is a Plesk server where users can set an email redirection
to their external address. I don't
know why, but many users do that.
i am out here because i never use such software
john:
We need to ensure that emails sent by some of our users are encrypted
(medical records, reports, etc) before they are sent.
We only accept out going mail from our local users by submission (port
587).
I realize that this is really the job of the MUA, but I would like to
check
Hello,
At work, we've set up a small Linux server with postfix on it, and configured
postfix to use an external SMTP mail server. The related settings in main.cf:
myhostname = scm1.ourdomain.commydestination = scm1.ourdomain.com,
localhostrelayhost = [externalmailer.ourdomain.com]
The
A. Abd-Allah:
Final-Recipient: rfc822;bob@gmail.comAction: failedStatus:
5.0.0Remote-MTA: smtp;MAILGW1.OURDOMAIN.COMDiagnostic-Code: X-Notes;
Error transferring to MAILGW1.OURDOMAIN.COM; Maximum hop count
exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
When a mail server receives mail via
Dr. Wietse,
Thank you for your valuable time, not just for this question, but for the
entire postfix product.
If I understood you correctly, increasing the hop count limit may help in this
case. I only see 1 or 2 headers that are being added, but I am not sure. I can
try changing the limit
A. Abd-Allah:
Dr. Wietse,
Thank you for your valuable time, not just for this question, but
for the entire postfix product.
If I understood you correctly, increasing the hop count limit may
help in this case. I only see 1 or 2 headers that are being added,
but I am not sure. I can try
I have a postfix with lotus notes setup. That peice is working fine. I use
a transport map entry to send the email to the Domino server.
What I want to do is send all incoming and outgoing mail to a second server
that will be for historical purposes. I will be using cyrus as the
mailstore.
My
am i th eonly one currently receiving a ton of spam with all
sorts of job vacation to my postmaster-account all day long?
different sender-IPs so abuse to the providr will not help
much, problem here is via RFC postmaster must not be filtered
and so the spamfirewall does not help in any way
how
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
Look into greylisting it. You'll find that greylisting could very
well deal with most of the bots that things like zen.spamhaus.org
would normally deal with. And
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:26:45PM -0500, john wrote:
I realize that this is really the job of the MUA, but I would like
to check that emails are in fact encrypted before being sent.
this can be ensured by running the emails through a (specialized)
content filter.
suitable message/code.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:36:09PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:26:45PM -0500, john wrote:
Is any of this possible, if so suggestions as to where to look or
solutions.
I would try to copy-cat the typical amavisd-new pre-queue setup,
substituting amavis with your
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:59:22PM -0500, Peter Blair wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
Look into greylisting it. You'll find that greylisting could very
well deal with most of the bots
Am 17.02.2012 21:59, schrieb Peter Blair:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
Look into greylisting it. You'll find that greylisting could very
well deal with most of the bots that things like
On Feb 17, 2012 6:14 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.02.2012 21:59, schrieb Peter Blair:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
Look into greylisting it. You'll find that
Am 18.02.2012 00:17, schrieb Simon Brereton:
On Feb 17, 2012 6:14 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.02.2012 21:59, schrieb Peter Blair:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
what i do not understand is how f^%@#!!$ stupid
people are spamming to postmaster/abuse-addresses
(bowdlerized for comical effect -ed)
As near as I can tell, the spammers just run under a few assumptions. RFC
requires one to maintain those
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
what i do not understand is how %#^%$@!! stupid
people are spamming to postmaster/abuse-addresses
Oh. One other thing - they don't care. There is no courtesy. They don't
care if you scream at them, yell at them, because people are paying them
to
Am 18.02.2012 02:46, schrieb Dennis Carr:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
what i do not understand is how %#^%$@!! stupid
people are spamming to postmaster/abuse-addresses
Oh. One other thing - they don't care. There is no courtesy. They don't
care if you scream at them,
Dr. Wietse,
Thank you again for your time. I have been an off-and-on-again user of Postfix
for many years, and it is a real honor (and surprise!) to get support directly
from its originator.
The hop-count limit is reached in the REMOTE mail server.
I suspected as much, but I wasn't sure.
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 15:43 -0500, Rich wrote:
I have a postfix with lotus notes setup. That peice is working fine. I
use a transport map entry to send the email to the Domino server.
What I want to do is send all incoming and outgoing mail to a second
server that will be for historical
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 15:49 -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:59:22PM -0500, Peter Blair wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
Look into greylisting it. You'll find that
36 matches
Mail list logo
