Oscar Cruz:
Hi folks i'm trying to figure out a problem with some domains when they send
mails to my server. apparently the problem comes from an invalid header but
i don't know what kind of parameter must change, cause this isn't happens
with all the domains just with some ones.
Jul 28
Seth Mattinen:
I'm seeing Error: message file too big but I'm not sure what's causing
it. The exact byte count of the message+headers is 100793284, but I have
message_size_limit set to 104857600. Is there something else going into
the size calculation that I'm missing?
Yes, the message
Wietse Venema:
Seth Mattinen:
I'm seeing Error: message file too big but I'm not sure what's causing
it. The exact byte count of the message+headers is 100793284, but I have
message_size_limit set to 104857600. Is there something else going into
the size calculation that I'm missing
dvodvo:
Jul 30 00:59:44 mydomain postfix/smtp[13941]: 7D04B96117E4:
to=mygmailn...@gmail.com, orig_to=d...@mydomain.ca,
relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[209.85.133.27]:25, delay=1.6,
delays=0/0.01/0.13/1.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1248933584
d35si1808699and.15)
The 250 2.0.0 OK
k p:
Hi There,
I have a real scenario that I'm not sure how to solve it,
local clients on the same machine that postfix resides : I want
them to be restricted to their particular virtual domains that they
have access to:
This is a sample:
User one (UID/GID 500) :? has 2 virtual
Stefan F?rster:
When I submit a mail to my Postfix server (using SASL auth over a TLS
connection), Postfix adds the following received header:
Received: from aletheia.cite.lan (33.33.33.333.dynamic.cablesurf.de
[33.33.33.333]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256
ram:
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
limit
Only via the policy daemon protocol.
Wietse
Andrew T. Robinson:
delay=2005, delays=1283/0/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=5004, delays=4283/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=7283, delays=6561/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
I these numbers aren't modified for privacy reasons, Google is
tarpitting your
John Peach:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:18:52 +0200
Robin Smidsr__d ro...@smidsrod.no wrote:
[snip]
Willy De la Court wrote:
Does this mean that all of the reject rules are in fact not
RFC-conformant?
The reason I mention reject_invalid_helo_hostname is that I'm unsure
if the
jessk...@brel.com:
Dear netizens
sorry to trouble you. My server is just overloaded with too much spams.
When I view the output of netstat -ln, there are over 400 ip addresses
connecting to my postfix server actively. In our mail.log, the connections
are from these ip addresses that had
Mauricio Tavares:
make makefiles CC=gcc \
CCARGS='-DUSE_TLS -DHAS_PCRE -DUSE_SASL_AUTH \
-DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\dovecot\ \
-I/usr/sfw/include -I/opt/sfw/include -I/usr/local/include \
-I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.7/include ' \
That does not enable any of the Postfix Berkeley DB
Magnus B?ck:
On Wednesday, August 05, 2009 at 10:11 CEST,
Robert Socha so...@eur.pl wrote:
Evgeniy Arbatov pisze:
This is what I have in master.cf:
lmtp inet n - n - - lmtp
I am sure all the LDAP lookups are working fine and I did
Jaroslaw Grzabel:
My company decided to limit a number of messages per day per IP. That's
why we run anvil and limit 1000msg/24h/IP, so I put into main.cf:
Don't use anvil(8) for long-term statistics.
ANVIL(8) ANVIL(8)
...
The
Robert Socha:
Hi,
My problem is... :)
I would like that the selected messages injected by specified interface
remain in the queue for no longer than 2 hours. I used this
configuration (master.cf), but it seems that it is not working as I want:
bulk.example.pl: smtp inet n - n - -
James Hankins:
amavisfeed unix- - n- 2 lmtp
-o lmtp_data_done_timeout=1200
-o lmtp_send_xforward_command=yes
-o disable_dns_lookups=yes
-o max_use=20
and do a
Michal Ludvig:
Hi all,
is there any way for postfix to enforce CRLF line endings as required by
RFC2822? At the moment it happily accepts Unix-style LF-only lines and
I'd like to prevent that.
CRLF are required by RFC 2821 (the same is true for its successor
and predecessor). That is, email
Chris Simmons:
Hi all,
In testing (and by reading the archives) I have found that postfix
only supports one level of wildcard SSL certificates. That is to
say, I can get a certificate for *.example.com that will match
host1.example.com and host2.example.com, but won't match
Florin Andrei:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Florin Andrei:
Florin Andrei wrote:
Is there a way to bind the listener to an interface using the interface
name (eth5:smtp) instead of the IP (1.2.3.4:smtp)?
No. The bind(2) system call specifies an address. Not an interface,
and not the route
Juraj Marusiak:
Hi all,
I have some questions regarding postfix.
1.
I need to relay all emails through my ISP mail server which requires
authentication (AUTH PLAIN LOGIN). In order to achieve this, i assume, i
need SASL support compiled. Do I really need SASL compiled if i want to send
Dabrien 'Dabe' Murphy:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Instead of having to maintain a bazillion different reply parameters,
would not it be sufficient to have one generic reply line that
gets appended to all those reject commands?
Hi Wietse,
If the dilemma is between:
I was thinking
Hari Hendaryanto:
Hi,
Does reject_rbl_client handle ipv6 address?
In Postfix 2.6 and later.
Wietse
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
mail_version = 2.7-20090807
Some more details:
Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: daemon started -- version
2.7-20090807, configuration /etc/postfix
Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]:
Jeroen van Aart:
I should add that I was miss interpreting the terminating on signal
15. That in fact is my monitor doing its work, which I installed after
noticing postfix would regularly quit. It's likely the actual kill
Internally, postfix stop uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Oddly enough, this does only happen on mail-ausfall, mail, with the
same master.cf doesn't show it...
The message i logged only when you run an OLD master daemon.
Very very strange
Jeroen van Aart:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Internally, postfix stop uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
daemon. This signal is also used by system shutdown procedures.
Right, the monitor will use /etc/init.d/postfix stop|start in order to
attempt to restart postfix.
Postfix has proven
Jeroen van Aart:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix has proven to be rock solid, and there is no need to
make it less reliable with trigger-happy babysitters.
I am not giving any value judgement to postfix. In fact it's one of the
few MTAs I would trust to run on any systems I manage
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
I removed the warning for services with process limit = 1 in the
2.7-nonprod release series, when I added the postscreen daemon.
I installed the non - non-prod-version and kept the master.cf entries :(
Aha. I haven't yet ported
Stefan F?rster:
Dear members of postfix-users,
can anyone of you please explain to me what the following log entry
means:
postfix/smtpd[8558]: improper command pipelining after QUIT from
unknown[64.8.20.35]
This means that the client sent QUITCRLF followed by something
else; a sign of
Stefan F?rster:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Stefan F?rster:
Dear members of postfix-users,
can anyone of you please explain to me what the following log entry
means:
postfix/smtpd[8558]: improper command pipelining after QUIT from
unknown[64.8.20.35
Jeroen van Aart:
I am pretty sure the babysitter does a few false restarts just because
the system is overloaded and it's not getting a response soon enough.
But without it you'd have an MTA less system for days. It's checking
connectivity on 127.0.0.1:25 with a timeout of 35 seconds, which
Benny Pedersen:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:21:47 -0300, Marcelo Terres mhter...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know that, and I'm looking for help there too.
This patch is not a supported part of Postfix.
For support please go to the maintainers of the patch.
Wietse
Marcelo Terres:
Well, let me change the subject a little:
Anybody can indicate me a policy daemon or some solution to reject messages
for over quota at smtp time ?
I suggest: maintain an SMTPD access map that rejects mail for users
that are over quota; update this access map a few times a
Eduardo J?nior:
Hi,
where can I read about this?
How can I change the format and what each part means?
You can configure the text (see: man 5 bounce) before the
non-deliverable recipients, but you cannot configure the format of
bounce messages. The format is defined in Internet RFC
Jeroen van Aart:
Aug 15 02:55:06 prod101 postfix/master[9402]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/qmgr pid 9582 exit status 1
Good. Now look for error/fatal/warning loggings BEFORE this record.
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Look for obvious signs of trouble
Eduardo J?nior:
and I have some doubts.
This:
With Postfix 2.4 and later, a message is returned as either message/rfc822
(the complete original) or as text/rfc822-headers (the headers only)
does means that if my postifxis 2.4 the body of the message sent
doesn't included in
the bounce
Jeroen van Aart:
That's it until
Aug 15 02:55:06 prod101 postfix/master[9402]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/qmgr pid 9582 exit status 1
I don't think so.
Instead of YOU filtering by hand a long file, let the COMPUTER do
the work for you:
egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):'
Chris Smith:
Hi,
I'm hoping to obtain some confirmation on the data format the sendmail
interface expects, I am under the impression that as a NIX program it
will expect emails using LF for new lines as opposed to the SMTP
standard of CRLF. How does this apply to line folding? Does Postfix
Gaby L:
-
I want to use virtual_alias_maps but I want to appear original
destination address in header.
It is possible?
As documented (man 5 virtual), virtual_alias_maps changes the
ENVELOPE address not the HEADER address.
Wietse
Thanks
Postfix logs the orig_to
...@de.opel.com
From: Dragos Dobre dragos.do...@gm.com
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:19:09 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DERUEMA16/M/GMSERVER/GMC at 17.08.2009
12:19:12
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_mixed 0038B094C125761
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema
Junior Tux:
Dear all , i have a big problem with postfx queue. I'm using postfix
amavis spamassain. But queue has 5 mails. it's sending very slow.
What Can i do ? Thanks.
The first thing you should do is search the logfile for signs of
trouble that causes programs to fail.
Noel Jones:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:09:52AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Aug 20 22:49:01 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: connect from
unknown[XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK]
Aug 20 22:49:02 server postfix/smtpd[7724]: setting up TLS connection
from
? ???:
Hi !
Is there any Programming Interface (api) , so that a Postfix instance
could be accessed programmaticaly, say, a C program?
Currently, all the SUPPORTED interfaces require that non-Postfix
code communicates with Postfix via some protocol: examples are
the SMTP
none none:
I've setup postfix for before queue
I have not chosen to install milter but to create my own.
I did that in PHP.
Now, I am at a part, where my PHP milter has to communicate with postfix.
Aim is to get string from postfix, evaluate it and send it back to postfix.
So I started
Noel Jones:
--
Aug 22 07:52:12 zerhuel postfix/smtpd[2109]: initializing the server-side
TLS engine
This is logged ONCE when a postfix/smtpd process starts up.
Then, it handles one or more SMTP clients.
So, 'initializing the server-side TLS engine' is logged only before
the FIRST SMTP
Ing. Davy Leon:
Hi all
I have a postfix 2.3.3 running on Centos 5.3. Postfix delivers
mail through an authenticated smarthost based on a per user
authentication. Everything works fine until some smarthost's
account get blocked for some brute force attack or something. The
fact is that any
the Google system, and try queries of
the form:
site:postfix.org postmaster bounce
This will lead you to quite rapidly to pages such as:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#notify_classes
Wietse
Thanks
David
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie
Jeroen van Aart:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen van Aart:
Yes I did:
egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /var/log/mail.* | grep qmgr
gunzip -c /var/log/mail.*.*.gz | egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' |
grep qmgr
How much time is between the LAST qmgr[9582] logfile record BEFORE
Michael Monnerie:
I've just had a very strange bug which cost me an hour to find.
mailserver: postfix-2.5.1-28.5
On the mailserver, I should receive mail from 212.69.162.205.
# dig -x 212.69.162.205
showed me a correct, existing PTR:
205.192-28.162.69.212.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR
tom lee:
If there can be some delay between receipt and replication, something like
rsync will work fine, although it will propagate users' mistakes. If you
need the message delivered to both stores at roughly the same time, the
virtual_alias_maps solution would work, or you can e.g. have
bsd:
Hello,
Here is the situation, we have a primary mail server located in the
data center of an African Operator.
Unfortunately the internet link is not steady at all and It tends to
fail every week for couple of hours and sometimes even for days.
For strategical reasons this
Michael Monnerie:
On Donnerstag 27 August 2009 Wietse Venema wrote:
And this was logged when a reverse hostname resolved to the wrong IP
address:
? ? Aug 26 00:26:12 spike postfix/smtpd[13393]: warning:
61.135.132.106: address not listed for hostname
relay2nd.mail.sohu.com
I just
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
Which Postfix restriction generates: Helo command rejected: Domain not
found?
From the log on albatross.python.org:
Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]:
Wietse Venema:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
Which Postfix restriction generates: Helo command rejected: Domain not
found?
From the log on albatross.python.org:
Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning
fakessh:
hi all
hi list
how well set + anvil
I would like to fine tune + anvil
Do not change these settings unless they cause problems.
Wietse
I wish there was not time to expectations identified in the original
configuration of postfix.
I would minimize the role of + anvil
Klaus Engelmann:
I tried to use the $transport_maps.
Not to sound hostile, but could you be bothered to provide some
concrete evidence in the form of configuration and logging, as
requested in the mailing list welcome message, repeated below?
Wietse
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see
Jim Wright:
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Mail from yahoo.com is now rejected with:
Aug 28 16:24:05 mgate2 postfix/smtpd[53002]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from web34202.mail.mud.yahoo.com[66.163.178.117]: 554 5.7.1
web34202.mail.mud.yahoo.com: Helo command rejected:
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:19:48AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Aug 31 09:09:20 server postfix/smtpd[17106]: warning: dict_ldap_lookup:
Search error -5: Timed out
Aug 31 09:09:20 server postfix/cleanup[17106]: warning: AEF14688F:
virtual_alias_maps map lookup
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:33:54AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:19:48AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Aug 31 09:09:20 server postfix/smtpd[17106]: warning:
dict_ldap_lookup:
Search error -5: Timed out
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:40:34PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
We just pass a list of servers to the LDAP library.
Perhaps the simplest enhancement would be to rotate the server list
when a query times out, before asking the LDAP library to re-connect
Guy:
Hi,
I'm using a slight variation of the default delay notification
template which includes things like $delay_warning_time_hours and
$maximal_queue_lifetime_days.
A lot of users (ours anyway) won't read past the word MAILER-DAEMON
so if it's possible I'd like to be able to make the
Remy Lambert:
I'm a Postfix n00b, so I may be asking a loaded question...but here goes:
Recently, a user of mine sent an email to an incorrect address -
he garbled the domain name. It took six days for our mail server
to decide that it was undeliverable...
[snip]
Indeed, the mail system
...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:49 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Deferred queue settings?
Remy Lambert:
I'm a Postfix n00b, so I may be asking a loaded question...but here goes:
Recently, a user of mine sent an email to an incorrect
LuKreme:
On 2-Sep-2009, at 11:09, Remy Lambert wrote:
I come from the land of MS Exchange so, although I'm competent
I'm not sure one is allowed to use MS Exchange and competent in
the same sentence without a negation.
Only half kidding :)
LuKreme, stick to the technical topic,
Henri Shustak:
I am guessing that in the earlier version of postfix the entire email
address was being examined and now this is not the case.
The local(8) delivery agent has never used the domain in aliases(5).
You can verify this yourself. All the releases are available on-line,
starting
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
The policyd can't generate log entries out of the blue - but why those
messages were not logged then by postfix?
What policyd messages are you referring to?
What email messages were delivered, and what is the evidence in
Received: headers that those messages were handled by
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
The policyd can't generate log entries out of the blue - but why those
messages were not logged then by postfix?
What policyd messages are you referring to?
Home-breed, but free to use by anyone
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:57:09PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jozsef Kadlecsik:
The policyd can't generate log entries out of the blue - but why
Stefan F?rster:
Given no external interference, are queue IDs unique within a single
instance for the whole span a message stays within qmgr's control, or
can a mail in e.g. the deferred queue, share an ID with a message in
the active queue?
Postfix queue IDs are used as message file names.
Raimund Eimann:
Hi,
maybe it's me having completely weird ideas, but the existing Google
results for postfix ldap howto are not very satisfactory for me:
That's because LDAP is not really the right search term. Postfix
can use MySQL, PostgreSQL, and so on for similar purposes.
Information
Jack Bates:
How can I configure an LDAP map to use one result attribute if it
exists, and another if not?
Specify two maps
xxx_maps = ldap:/file/1 ldap:/file/2
where file2 resolves what file1 doesn't.
Wietse
Martina Tomisova:
Hi,
I'm analyzing logs to find the spam source and I've understood that if
someone sends the message, one of the first lines written to the log
file is a line containing the queue id and 'client=IP_ADDRESS'. But
That is incorrect.
The SMTP server logs the client= once
Wietse Venema:
Martina Tomisova:
Hi,
I'm analyzing logs to find the spam source and I've understood that if
someone sends the message, one of the first lines written to the log
file is a line containing the queue id and 'client=IP_ADDRESS'. But
That is incorrect.
The SMTP server
Martina Tomisova:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
not every time. Actually this line is missing just in cases the spam
is sent. :) How's that possible? Any ideas how can I get the IP
address of the sender in such case?
From the SMTP server's PROCESS ID field in the
Stefan Bunse:
--4D1DB6737244.1252203488/newsbox.webmatch.de
Content-Description: Notification
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This is the mail system at host newsbox.webmatch.de.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more
Sahil Tandon:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Marcel Montes wrote:
I have a transport that pipes to a perl script. Everything is fine and
dandy, but whenever the script fails the whole perl error message
gets appended right after the failure_template message.
I've checked bounce(5), bounce(8),
Noel Jones:
On 9/8/2009 6:20 AM, Duncan B. wrote:
Hi,
Firstly this is my first post to the list, so apologies if I've not
correctly followed any procedures.
I'm a new user to Postfix (ex Qmail user) and love it. However, there is
one feature of qmqtool that was very useful:
Duncan B.:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Indeed, qshape targets outflow. Inflow analysis is easily done
based on logfile records.
Are you able to recommend any methods / tools to extract this information
from the log files, Wietse, or is it just a case of writing a script
Duncan B.:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix doesn't store IPs in the queue file, so there is no
such tool for postfix.
Client information records were added late in the Postfix life
cycle, and they are used mainly by for xforward and milters.
However, the 'qshape
Mark Johnson:
All,
How can I add more one recipient? I want both webmaster and postmaster can
receive error email.
The default setting:
bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
delay_notice_recipient = postmaster
error_notice_recipient = postmaster
I know Sendmail can just add next to it
Preston Lord:
Hi All,
We are having an issue with postfix where some messages keep looping to the
local recipient every hour or so. Servers that we consistently have trouble
with are apple.com servers : in this example bz1.apple.com .
I will post the details below, but the server
Gerard:
I use fetchmail to harvest mail from a couple of accounts. I added this
to the main.cf file and fetchmail stopped delivering mail.
smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt
This was the error message:
fetchmail: SMTP error: 530 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first
fetchmail: SMTP
Marcel Montes:
What does postfix actually add to the bounce message?
The STDERR output if the return status is not 0?
Postfix absorbs stdout and stderr. There is some information in
the pipe(8) man page, but it is not complete.
Wietse
DIAGNOSTICS
Command exit status codes
Robin Whittle:
I am not sure whether this is specified in an RFC, but I understand
that for every part of the remote MTA's response which starts with
544- there should be a new line in the message to the sender.
Error reports are standardized in 346[1-4]. I invite you to point
out the
Gerard:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:30:22 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Gerard:
I use fetchmail to harvest mail from a couple of accounts. I added
this to the main.cf file and fetchmail stopped delivering mail.
smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt
Mathias Tausig:
Hy!
I want to write an after-queue content filter for my postfix
installation which is invoked by spawn (according to the FILTER_README
from postfix.org).
My problem is, that the input/output part simply does not work. I am
sending a 220 localhost SMTP foo to STDOUT at
LuKreme:
I've started seeing forged domain name in Message-ID: header: covisp.net
recently when sending from a covisp.net email address. I suspect
that it is the OS X Mail.app generating it's own Message-ID.
Some mail client software will use the domain as the message-id
domain.
Sukh Khehra:
I am installing postfix on a box where all users don't necessarily have
a home directory. Anyone know of a way to configure home_mailbox to
an absolute path(with username var) so every user's mailbox directory
resides under one top level directory?
If the user has no UNIX
Robin Whittle:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3464#section-2.3.6
diagnostic-code-field =
Diagnostic-Code : diagnostic-type ; *text
Since the Status code
will sometimes be less precise than the actual transport diagnostic
code, the Diagnostic-Code field is provided
Mathias Tausig:
Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 10:18 -0400 schrieb Wietse Venema:
[...]
This is an output buffering problem. You need to flush output
after each reply, perhaps by calling the flush() function.
Hy!
No, I am afraid that this is not the problem.
I am sendig you a few
The php-net-smtp PEAR module implements an SMTP client; you may
be able to pick some pieces to do the server portion of the protocol.
Wietse
Wietse Venema:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
Sep 11 09:24:05 zimbra postfix/postdrop[89912]: warning: unable to look up
public/pickup: No such file or directory
postdrop will chdir to the queue directory in
`postconf -dh config_directory`/main.cf
You can't override this unless the non
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:53:17PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49:03AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Don't forget that sendmail(1) is outside the persistent master-managed
Postfix service and can en-queue mail (to disk) for later
Alejandro Facultad:
Dear all, I have Debian Etch + Postfix 2.3.8 and I want to fast
up te mail queue, because sometines I notice that the messages
are delivered with some delay.
The reason for the delay is logged in the maillog file.
How can acelerate the sending of messages in Postfix ???
Paul Cockings:
Hi List -
I send a mail to d...@gdshgf.ggg via my postfix server
I get a an NDR back with the a 550 Host or domain name not found (in the
body)
- That works like normal
Now I'd like to alter things;
When I get an NDR I'd like to parse the header only to find who the
Kenneth Stephen:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi,
I have a .forward file on an AIX system running postfix which
sends the mail to a program. Here is what I've observed on that
machine:
userid = x
machine = somehost
from a login session for x:
$ ulimit -a |
mic...@casa.co.cu:
hello list
Turns out I use a webmail (horde) in my workplace but apparently has a
bug, somehow are generating large numbers of messages to various
servers on the internet, yahoo, aol, hotmail and others. to keep me
look like an open relay server.
Sep 11 03:01:43
ghe:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report:
308 *Warning: Database file needs update
This message appears when you have a map file that requires
postmap'ing to bring the db file up to date relative to the
Seth Mattinen:
Multiline responses in SMTP are (as far as I know) not allowed. I'm sure
Wietse will correct me it I'm wrong, but I can't ever recall it.
They are allowed. In fact, most EHLO server responses are multi-line.
Wietse
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure about this but... I prefer asking for being totally
sure. Hey mates imagine a policy daemon has a (server time limit) time
limit of 3600 seconds... like hasn't arrived the max_idle time...
spawn doesn't close it and now it's near to
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
When you are running the policy service under the spawn daemon:
1) The time limit BEGINS after an SMTP server connects to the
policy server port, when a new policy daemon process is created.
Thus, an SMTP server always mates with a policy server that
601 - 700 of 13075 matches
Mail list logo
