On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:14:06AM +0100, Carsten Schlote wrote:
Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 00:03 +0100 schrieb Ladislav Michl:
As newer kernels emulates binary interface we probably do not want to
support
obsolete interfaces, right?
http://lwn.net/Articles/361001/
Hi
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:14:45PM +0100, Carsten Schlote wrote:
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Then it could be easy to read/write files in /proc/sys directly, unless you
found some sysctl entry which does not have its equivalent in /proc/sys. Is
it the case? Otherwise, it should be
carsten.schl...@gmx.net wrote:
From: Carsten Schlote c.schl...@konzeptpark.de
Signed-off-by: Carsten Schlote c.schl...@konzeptpark.de
applied, tnx
marc
---
generic/etc/sysctl.conf |4
rules/procps.make |2 ++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create
Ladislav Michl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:28:07PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
carsten.schl...@gmx.net wrote:
From: Carsten Schlote c.schl...@konzeptpark.de
Signed-off-by: Carsten Schlote c.schl...@konzeptpark.de
applied, tnx
As newer kernels emulates binary interface we
Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 00:03 +0100 schrieb Ladislav Michl:
As newer kernels emulates binary interface we probably do not want to support
obsolete interfaces, right?
http://lwn.net/Articles/361001/
Hi
Thanks for the point. As sysctl was in our firmware for a long time and
is still used
