be either posted here, or sent to the dedicated W3C mailing list
public-dwbp-comme...@w3.org.
The three co-editors (cc'ed) are also willing to receive personal emails,
should you not be sure that your feedback is fit for open publication!
Kind regards,
Antoine Isaac
--
RD Manager, Europeana.eu
Dear all,
This is a bottle at the sea...
We've started a couple of emails about translating the SKOS RDF OWL ontology,
after the official spec has been released, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2013Jul/0029.html
I'm not sure what the best way to do it. In the past
On 6/24/13 4:22 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 9:12 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will have
Hi Andreas, Prateek,
Very good points that you make about trust and domains.
In fact specific domains like the biology one or the culture one (see
lodlam.net) try to address these issues in much more specific terms and
business models that what would be discussed on this public-lod list.
So
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will have the resource to search in a decentralized
fashion...
What worries me a bit is how
mailto:dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com
On 28/08/12 20:39, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Sorry, my owl:someValuesFrom should have been owl:allValuesFrom, I
guess.
Actually I think owl:someValuesFrom is right though the easiest construct
is owl:hasValue :
some:codeAConcept
/iqvoc/
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/#L1101
Am 22.08.2012 21:15, schrieb Antoine Isaac:
Dear Thomas,
I'm ccing public-esw-t...@w3.org. Perhaps this was the one you were
looking for!
(1) (2)
You probably mean, if a ConceptScheme could be defined as a class, of
which
/led/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
[3] https://github.com/innoq/iqvoc/
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/#L1101
Am 22.08.2012 21:15, schrieb Antoine Isaac:
Dear Thomas,
I'm ccing public-esw-t...@w3.org. Perhaps this was the one you were
looking for!
(1) (2)
You
Dear Thomas,
I'm ccing public-esw-t...@w3.org. Perhaps this was the one you were looking for!
(1) (2)
You probably mean, if a ConceptScheme could be defined as a class, of which the
concepts of a given concept scheme are instances?
That would be the way to proceed, if you want to use the
On 6/8/12 1:53 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 6 Jun 2012, at 14:04, Antoine Isaac wrote:
By the way, I've tried to update our DataHub entry at
http://thedatahub.org/dataset/stitch-rameau, fitting decommissioned
somewhere. I've just added it as a tag for now, I did not know which other fields
Hi Leigh, Bradley, Rufus,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Bradley Allenbradley.p.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Leigh- This is great. The question that comes up for me out of what you've
written for unpublishing brings me back to Antoine's question: is it
appropriate to use a relation other than
On 5/31/12 4:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 31 May 2012, at 09:02, Rufus Pollock wrote:
You can definitely keep the dataset entry on CKAN there. We don't have
it now but one could introduce a special state of archived which
would then mean that the entry was kept but clearly marked as
with a sparql query which fails
and figures out from metadata how to turn it into one which works!
Tim
On 2012-05 -29, at 16:47, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Dear Bradley,
The second part of your plan reminds me of my recent question on
moving a dataset
http
://t4gm.info instead
respond with a 301 redirection to the equivalent id.loc.gov http://id.loc.gov
resource when that exists, else respond with a 410 error. - regards, BPA
Bradley P. Allen
http://bradleypallen.org
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl
mailto:ais...@few.vu.nl
But I guess that if we had decided to shut done our server altogether
I mean, shut down our vocabulary server, which handles the queries for data on individual
concepts. Which would leave us with just the ability to serve a same answer for the
entire domain...
Antoine
Dear Bradley,
The
Hi Dominic,
I guess that it was with the LOD *cloud* that you had issues. It looks a bit
severe, but I think I understand the motivations: if the cloud admitted
isolated nodes, it would have many of them, and that would look weird... But of
course that does not make your contribution less
/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-vocabdataset/#Library_Linked_Data_at_CKAN
are indeed isolated, in the LOD cloud sense.
Antoine
On 22 May 2012, at 08:42, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I guess that it was with the LOD *cloud* that you had issues. It looks a bit
severe, but I think I understand
Hi Dominic,
I understand the need to be careful. The email was a bit of a whim at the end
of the day. However, I would argue that we are not an isolated node we have
simply used ontology has the linking method and we have a very high level of
linkage (or harmonisation) with our partners who
, at 21:41, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Hugh,
It seems that
http://sameas.org/store/kelle/?uri=http://stitch.cs.vu.nl/vocabularies/rameau/ark:/12148/cb14521343b
already has the owl:sameAs to http://data.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb14521343b
so all is already taken care of! Great job :-)
Excellent - thanks
Hi Bernard,
Indeed there is a bit of trust from the STITCH side: we believe than whatever was at stitch:x will
be found at bnf:x. And we're talking about one same concept, yes: it's not one new
concept replacing an old one. It is an identity change, so to say.
If there's a change to that
, at 14:11, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Thanks a lot for your feedback! That's really precious.
@Richard, Jon: yes, we'll try to have the 301 working for a while. But not
forever, so it would be good if something could function as a more stable
solution. Though I'm not sure the requirement is too strong
data that enables it to
make the connection with the original resource (URI) it was seeking data about.
Does that seem ok? What should we do, otherwise?
Thanks for any feedback you could have,
Antoine Isaac (VU Amsterdam side)
Romain Wenz (BnF side)
[1] RAMEAU is a vocabulary (thesaurus) used
, otherwise?
Thanks for any feedback you could have,
Antoine Isaac (VU Amsterdam side)
Romain Wenz (BnF side)
[1] RAMEAU is a vocabulary (thesaurus) used by the National Library of France
(BnF) for describing books.
Dear all (apologies for cross-posting)
data.europeana.eu has already existed for several months, but I thought it
could be useful to share the following re-release with you, since all the
metadata there is now CC0.
We of course wish to release even more in the coming months. We hope in the
Yann, Giovanni,
Which side effects are probable ?
Giovanni has made the same comment on data.europeana.eu a couple of weeks ago.
The data we serve there is different from the RDFa mark-up on our web portal.
We had some reasons to do this, including, well, that the RDFa data is mixing
the
Hi,
Which side effects are probable ?
Giovanni has made the same comment on data.europeana.eu a couple of
weeks ago. The data we serve there is different from the RDFa mark-up
on our web portal.
We had some reasons to do this, including, well, that the RDFa data is
mixing the info and
[apologies for cross-posting]
--
W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group
CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group
(http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/)
has been chartered
--
Apologies for Cross-posting
=
DC-2011 Call for Papers
=
International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications:
Metadata Harmonization: Bridging Languages of
** apologies for cross-postings **
The Open Bibliographic Data Working Group of the Open Knowledge
Foundation has published a set of principles for open bibliographic
data. [1] These principles express a philosophy of openness for
bibliographic data in support of research and knowledge
Dear Daniel,
Adding to the feedback you've already received...
The vocabulary that Europeana is planning to use in its RDF/linked data
activities is at [1].
You were given quite some pointers to museums, let me give some on libraries
:-) -- we're going to see more and more interaction between
for your time,
Emmanuelle Bermes (Emmanuelle.Bermes_bnf.fr), Alexander Haffner
(A.Haffner_d-nb.de),
Antoine Isaac (aisaac_few.vu.nl) and Jodi Schneider (jodi.schneider_deri.org)
[1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UCCuration
[3] http
Anja, Richard, (ccing the Library Linked Data list)
Really great work! Adding to Rinke's comment, I'm also happily surprised by the coherence that you still can
give to the various parts of the LOD cloud: the colored version is really fascinating to see [1]. Our core
library linked data core
On 9/22/10 1:18 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:45:07 +0200
Antoine Isaacais...@few.vu.nl wrote:
Very interesting! I'm curious though: what's the application scenario
that made you create this version?
It makes it easy to insult people in RDF.
#you a wordnet:Fool .
Hi Ed,
Great job!
And again it might be showing some (minor) issues in the data harvested for BTC
-- probably not BTC organizers' fault, cf our discussion at [1].
By complete chance I spotted a small bibsonomy.org node attached to
semanticweb.org through dblp.l3s.de. But there is also a
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:30:52 +0100
Ian Davisli...@iandavis.com wrote:
This is based on the RDF conversion at
http://semanticweb.cs.vu.nl/lod/wn30/
How similar is your work to this version?
They're similar in that they're both based on Wordnet 3. There are some
key differences though:
1.
for your time,
Emmanuelle Bermes (Emmanuelle.Bermes_bnf.fr), Alexander Haffner
(A.Haffner_d-nb.de),
Antoine Isaac (aisaac_few.vu.nl) and Jodi Schneider (jodi.schneider_deri.org)
[1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UCCuration
[3] http
Hi Bernard,
Sorry for the late answer.
As a matter of fact an updated version of the manually-built gold standard that
we have used for [2] has been just now made available as linked data
(skos:closeMatch statements), both at the prototype site for the French RAMEAU
subject headings [3] and
--- Apologies for cross-postings ---
21 May 2010
W3C is pleased to announce the creation of the Library Linked Data Incubator
Group [1], whose mission is to help increase global interoperability of library
data on the Web, by bringing together people involved in Semantic Web
activities -
On 2/14/10 5:58 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 14, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
Im not sure what you mean by 'stable identity',
It's a slightly (possibly unorthodox) viewpoint I take during RDF
editing: With a container, you can say I will edit the sequence at
URI X and be sure
Hello Monika
My turn to add some stuff to the list! But I have a wide scope for what
cultural heritage material could be ;-)
First, there's Libris, a really important work at the Swedish library [1].
Also in the library world, two big vocabularies (the American LCSH [2] and
French RAMEAU [3])
of owl:sameAs and avoid most of the usual coreference
problems.
Yes!
Antoine
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secindexing
On 3 Dec 2009, at 18:58, Antoine Isaac wrote:
And in fact, while I understand that it is not very intuitive to
have Bob the cougar as a skos:Concept (even though
Hi Richard,
On 2 Dec 2009, at 02:40, Peter DeVries wrote:
I was thinking that the species itself should be a class so that
individuals
of that species would be instances of that class.
Probably another skos:Concept class.
So an individual species concept class like that for the Cougar
Hi Peter (ccing the SKOS list, as this is a SKOS implementation, after all :-)
I also think that's really a cool effort, with a great potential!
My question would be about your choices wrt. the use of relatedMatch and
closeMatch: why do we have
http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p
than the 2009 CoL
LSID.
It is for this reason that I made the ubioLSID a skos:relatedMatch while
having the CoL LSID a skos:closeMatch.
Does that seem to make sense?
Thanks for your interest :-)
- Pete
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl
mailto:ais...@few.vu.nl
Alexandre Passant a écrit :
Hi,
On 8 Oct 2009, at 16:09, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
The intersection of Leigh Dodds SPARQL extensions survey [1], imminent
official release of Virtuoso 6.0 (DBpedia basic and Live already use
this, ditto LOD Cache, and B3S public endpoints), and an old post
correspond to existing practices, and is used in a lot of data out there, which can be exploited in a large number of interesting scenarios...
Best,
Antoine
On Jul 23, 2009, at 4:24 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hello,
Trying to add some explanation wrt. the SKOS vocabulary, hoping not to
conflict
Hello,
Trying to add some explanation wrt. the SKOS vocabulary, hoping not to conflict
with Pat's clarifications ;-)
For skos:exactMatch, the SKOS reference says [1]:
The property skos:exactMatch is used to link two concepts, indicating a high
degree of confidence that the concepts can be
information, please visit [1] or contact aisaac at few.vu.nl.
Thanks a lot for your attention,
Antoine
[1] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl/rameau
[2] http://rameau.bnf.fr
[3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub
[5] http://macs.cenl.org
Antoine Isaac
Vrije
Kingsley Idehen a écrit :
Antoine Isaac wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to announce the release an *experimental* service [1] that
provides the RAMEAU subject headings as open linked data.
Rameau [2] is the main subject vocabulary used at the French national
library (BnF) and many other French
, details of the SKOS
constructs which are supported, any other URLs describing the software
or providing further information.
Kind regards,
Alistair Miles and Antoine Isaac
on behalf of the W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
50 matches
Mail list logo
