Re: Business Of Linked Data: Opportunities re., Smart Agents (Bots)

On 14 July 2016 at 17:16, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 7/8/16 10:40 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > All, > > > > Smart Agents and Bots are now hot topics across the industry at large. > > > > Bearing in mind years of knowledge and experience this community has in > >

Re: Mediatypes that map to application/ld+json with a profile

On 16 July 2016 at 06:21, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > Hi Sarven, Phil, Rob, > > > Are there mediatypes that map to application/ld+json with a profile? > > This begs the question why one would want to do that. > This was investigated by the WG. Over a period of time the

Re: Where are the Linked Data Driven Smart Agents (Bots) ?

On 6 July 2016 at 20:49, Kingsley Idehen <kide...@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > On 6 July 2016 at 17:22, Kingsley Idehen <kide...@openlinksw.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> Smart Agents and Bots

Re: Where are the Linked Data Driven Smart Agents (Bots) ?

On 6 July 2016 at 17:22, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > All, > > Smart Agents and Bots are now hot topics across the industry at large. > > Bearing in mind years of knowledge and experience this community has in > regards to Bots and Smart Agents [1], are there any Linked Data

Re: Deprecating owl:sameAs

On 1 April 2016 at 15:01, Sarven Capadisli wrote: > There is overwhelming research [1, 2, 3] and I think it is evident at this > point that owl:sameAs is used inarticulately in the LOD cloud. > > The research that I've done makes me conclude that we need to do a massive > sweep

Re: vocabularies for votes and suggestions

On 24 January 2016 at 16:58, Alexandre Rademaker wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know vocabs for describe votes and suggestions? Our Portuguese > Wordnet in http://wnpt.brlcloud.com/wn/ is distributed from its > beginning as RDF. We have recently develop this web

Re: What Happened to the Semantic Web?

On 12 November 2015 at 12:45, Nicolas Chauvat wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:27:10PM -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > > To me, The Semantic Web is like Google, but then run on my machine. > > > > To me its just a Web of Data [...] > > Ruben says "The

Re: What Happened to the Semantic Web?

On 11 November 2015 at 18:25, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > Hi Kingsley, > > While your main points are correct, I disagree with your conclusion. > I guess everything depends on what you mean with "The Semantic Web", > but if I read the article with that title, we're arguably

Re: What Happened to the Semantic Web?

On 11 November 2015 at 15:17, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > All, > > I think I inadvertently forgot to share this blog post [1] with this > community. > Really enjoyed. I think sem web has evolved on a number vectors 1. Big data and gov, seems to be really embracing linked

Re: What Happened to the Semantic Web?

On 11 November 2015 at 23:56, Wouter Beek wrote: > ​Hi Ruben, Kingsley, others, > ​ > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Ruben Verborgh > wrote: > >> Of course—but the emphasis in the community has mostly been on servers, >> > ​The emphasis has been on

Re: New LOD dataset for media types

On 5 November 2015 at 00:21, Silvio Peroni wrote: > Dear friends, > > We are pleased to announce a new LOD dataset > > http://www.sparontologies.net/mediatype > > that makes available media types defined as proper resources in RDF, > according to the SPAR Ontologies [1]

Re: Please publish Turtle or JSON-LD instead of RDF/XML [was Re: Recommendation for transformation of RDF/XML to JSON-LD in a web browser?]

On 4 September 2015 at 12:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes < soiland-re...@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > +1 to minimize RDF/XML use! > > I do also think there is the same danger now of JSON-LD being seen as > a dialect of JSON, rather than a way to serialize RDF. > > I have seen people trying to do

Re: Please publish Turtle or JSON-LD instead of RDF/XML [was Re: Recommendation for transformation of RDF/XML to JSON-LD in a web browser?]

On 3 September 2015 at 19:03, David Booth wrote: > Side note: RDF/XML was the first RDF serialization standardized, over 15 > years ago, at a time when XML was all the buzz. Since then other > serializations have been standardized that are far more human friendly to > read and

Re: Discovering a query endpoint associated with a given Linked Data resource

On 26 August 2015 at 10:45, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya nmihi...@fi.upm.es wrote: Hi, Is there a standard or widely used way of discovering a query endpoint (SPARQL/LDF) associated with a given Linked Data resource? I know that a client can use the follow your nose and related link

Re: [ANN] beta release of 'Linked Data Reactor' for component-based LD application development

On 23 June 2015 at 16:55, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 6/23/15 9:07 AM, Ali Khalili wrote: Dear all, we are happy to announce the beta release of our LD-R (Linked Data Reactor) framework for developing component-based Linked Data applications: http://ld-r.org The LD-R

Re: Presence Ontology

On 6 March 2015 at 11:04, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr wrote: Melvin, Le 6 mars 2015 à 10:56, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com a écrit : OPO would be a good match, but is the vocab / project still alive? If you really want to use OPO, you can visit the page

Re: Presence Ontology

On 4 March 2015 at 11:41, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr wrote: Hello Melvin, Le 4 mars 2015 à 09:54, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com a écrit : I was looking to model presence for a chat app using linked data. I thought about using http://online-presence.net

Presence Ontology

I was looking to model presence for a chat app using linked data. I thought about using http://online-presence.net/ But the site has not been up for about a year. Does anyone have experience of this use case?

Re: opengraph like search on sparql?

On 3 February 2015 at 10:53, Giovanni Tummarello g.tummare...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, would anyone be able to recommend/point to available system/library to get opengraph search capabilities like.. like in facebook .. things like pictures that my friends like people depicted in pictures

Re: LOV v3 Annoucement

On 15 January 2015 at 12:20, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche py.vandenbuss...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have the pleasure to announce the release of a new version of the Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV) application. A massive re-engineering of the application has been made, now using the power of

Re: [Ann] WebVOWL 0.3 - Visualize your ontology on the web

On 23 December 2014 at 00:17, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote: On 2014-12-22 13:04, Steffen Lohmann wrote: On 21.12.2014 04:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote: I would normally expect a ? in the query string however, rather than, # which I presume is the 1337 way to hide the ontology from

Re: [Ann] WebVOWL 0.3 - Visualize your ontology on the web

On 19 December 2014 at 17:57, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 12/19/14 10:49 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote: Hi all, we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which integrates our OWL2VOWL converter now. WebVOWL works in modern web browsers without any installation so

Re: Position Advertised - Web Developer

On 19 September 2014 14:21, Hugh Glaser h...@glasers.org wrote: We are keen to have someone who can do Linked Data technologies, although it would be hard to make it a requirement, as it would restrict the market too much.

Re: URIs within URIs

On 4 September 2014 20:57, Hugh Glaser h...@glasers.org wrote: Nice. That enumerates the choices, I think. In a world where the services are themselves being used as LD URIs (because everything is a LD URI, of course!) there is the orthogonal question of whether the URI needs to be

Re: Linked Data and Semantic Web CoolURIs, 303 redirects and Page Rank.

On 18 July 2014 14:05, Mark Fallu m.fa...@griffith.edu.au wrote: I am attempting to understand how the the CoolURI 303 redirect pattern for the semantic web (http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/) can be implemented without negative impact on search engines. Just a quick question: Is there any

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.0 Release

, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats, this is a really cool resource! Will the latest release be used at? http://any23.org/ On 16 May 2014 23:31, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, The Apache Any23 PMC are proud to announce

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.0 Release

On 16 July 2014 16:41, Sergio Fernández sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote: On 16/07/14 16:33, Melvin Carvalho wrote: Do you know if JSON LD will be supported? AFAIK 1.0 should already come with JSON-LD support: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-177 Thanks

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.0 Release

On 16 July 2014 17:27, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Melvin, On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the pointer. Sorry if I may have missed something, but I was referring to the any23.org website, rather

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.0 Release

Congrats, this is a really cool resource! Will the latest release be used at? http://any23.org/ On 16 May 2014 23:31, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, The Apache Any23 PMC are proud to announce the immediate release of Any23 1.0 which is a major release for the

Re: Sindice.com end of support and history

On 29 April 2014 19:28, Giovanni Tummarello g.tummare...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, the Sindice team announces today the end of the support of the Sindice.com service. Effective late March we have put the service in “read only” mode. Maintenance on our side will continue until August 30th.

Re: Alternative Linked Data principles

On 28 April 2014 17:23, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: The current Linked Data principles rely on specific standards and protocols such as HTTP, URIs and RDF/SPARQL. Because I think it's healthy to look at things from a different prospective, I was wondering whether the same idea of a

Re: Five Stars of Linked Data Vocabulary Use

On 11 April 2014 03:45, Pascal Hitzler pascal.hitz...@wright.edu wrote: An opinion piece re. linked data quality and reusability: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/five- stars-linked-data-vocabulary-use (Semantic Web journal) All comments and feedback welcome. Interesting

Re: HTTPS for RDF URIs?

wrote: On 1/30/14 1:09 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: If not bad, is there any provision for allowing that an HTTPS URI that only differs in the scheme part from HTTPS URI be identified as the same resource? http and https are fundamentally different resources, but you can link

Re: HTTPS for RDF URIs?

On 29 January 2014 22:36, Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] malon...@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov wrote: Apologies if this topic has come up before (I feel certain that it has) but I've searched the archives and Googled, and can't find anything (maybe too many false positives). What are the

Re: Beginning work on an official Web Access Control spec.

On 17 October 2013 15:05, Andrei Sambra andrei.sam...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, For those of you who know me, please skip this paragraph. For the others, I would first like to introduce myself. My name is Andrei Sambra and for the past three years I have been involved in different W3C

Minecrafting with OS OpenData

Quite an innovative use of Open Data: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/innovate/developers/minecraft-map-britain.html

Re: Releasing RWW.IO

On 20 September 2013 17:08, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 9/20/13 4:43 AM, Luca Matteis wrote: I was just wondering how RWW.io could be making some cash with the service it's offering. Melvin, Luca is trying to brainstorm a business model for RWW.io and similar

Re: Releasing RWW.IO

attractive to a wider audience ... On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 September 2013 01:17, Fabio Barone holon.ea...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking about this a bit more. This is quite a smart model, but I think we can do better

Re: Releasing RWW.IO

On 14 August 2013 13:37, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: Great job Andrei! I love it and looking forward to using it *a lot*. For making money out of this sort of thing, look at how these guys have done it: http://www.iriscouch.com/ - it's a CouchDB cloud thingy. They have a good

Re: Releasing RWW.IO

On 20 September 2013 01:17, Fabio Barone holon.ea...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking about this a bit more. This is quite a smart model, but I think we can do better! Why not let RWW.IO issue it's own currency which allows you use extra bandwidth, storage etc. Brilliant. How would you

Re: {Disarmed} RWW-Play was: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 9 August 2013 20:32, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Thanks. Fair enough indeed. And thanks for sticking with me through the process. I know it's a pain when n00bs like me get involved trying to use bleeding edge code :-) I look forward to the consumer version. In fact, I have

Re: rel=meta or rel=acl ? was: Web Access Cntrl Spec?

On 10 August 2013 10:56, Henry Story henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote: On 10 Aug 2013, at 00:18, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: When talking about this with Alexandre Bertails he thought that rel=meta was not the right relation and that rel=acl would be more correct. Yes.

Re: rel=meta or rel=acl ? was: Web Access Cntrl Spec?

On 10 August 2013 14:23, Andrei Sambra andrei.sam...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 August 2013 10:56, Henry Story henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote: On 10 Aug 2013, at 00:18, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com

Re: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 9 August 2013 15:51, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: This is great! Thanks guys. I normally really, really don't care about all that crypto stuff (it should all happen transparently), but I'm find all this interesting! So yes, I created a p12 (using

Re: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 9 August 2013 16:45, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote: Henry, hello. I don't have much more to add here, because I can't fundamentally add much more than assertion, but I have a couple of brief responses. On 2013 Aug 9, at 14:41, Henry Story wrote: I don't have an easy

Re: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 9 August 2013 17:09, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Thanks Kingsley, On 9 Aug 2013, at 15:09, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 8/9/13 9:51 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote: So now all (!!!) I really need to do is make my wordpress site look for the ID thing. Hmmm.

Re: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 9 August 2013 18:22, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Hugh comes back to play / Thanks Kingsley, and Melvin and Henry and Norman. So, trying to cut it down to the minimum. (Sorry, I find some/many of the pages about it really hard going.) If I have a photo on a server,

Re: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 9 August 2013 18:55, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Thanks. I've looked at quite a bit of this stuff, but still don't see where the ACL document gets stored and used. I am beginning to get the sense that I may have to write some code, other than the ACL rdf to do this. Surely

Re: WebID Frustration

On 6 August 2013 13:37, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Well, RWW.IO looked exciting, so I decided to start with it. It *is* exciting! :) And it seemed a good idea to have an account, so I decided I would finally create a WebID login - I know that lots of people think that this is

Re: WebID Frustration

On 6 August 2013 13:37, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Well, RWW.IO looked exciting, so I decided to start with it. And it seemed a good idea to have an account, so I decided I would finally create a WebID login - I know that lots of people think that this is the Way Ahead. I have a

Re: WebID Frustration

On 6 August 2013 17:54, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote: Hugh and Kingsley, hello. On 2013 Aug 6, at 14:27, Kingsley Idehen wrote: In reality though, for your particular user profile I would encourage you to simply manually add insert the relations required by the WebID+TLS

Re: YASGUI: Web-based SPARQL client with bells ‘n wistles

On 30 July 2013 15:21, Laurens Rietveld laurens.rietv...@vu.nl wrote: Something related to YASGUI: I'm interested in how we as a community access endpoints, and what tasks we try to perform. I would strongly appreciate it if you could spare 5 minutes filling in this questionnaire

An ontology for adverts?

Does anyone know if there is any ontology for adverts? I'd like to take a product or service or project, then put up a banner link or a text ad on my site based on machine readable data Is DOAP the best bet?

Projects similar to LOD2

Some people on this list are involved with lod2 [1], a european initiative to promote open source and linked data. I was wondering if anyone knew if there were any other world wide projects of a similar nature, with a focus on creating open source software. [1]

Re: URLs in Data Working Draft

On 12 July 2013 17:03, Larry Masinter masin...@adobe.com wrote: Re Angels and Pins: http://masinter.blogspot.com/2010/03/resources-are-angels-urls-are-pins.html Larry, thanks for sharing, I enjoyed reading that. Re: [[ is http://larry.masinter.net; an identifier for me or for my web

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

and x2 such that both pairs (x1,y) and (x2,y) are instances of P. Although as someone has pointed out, this might be a little too OWL specific Cheers, Bernadette On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland bhyl

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland bhyl...@3roundstones.com wrote: Hi, On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group Note effective 27-June-2013.[1] We hope this document serves as a

Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?

On 25 June 2013 06:19, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote: On 06/22/2013 04:47 AM, Nathan Rixham wrote: What it means now, or at any point in time, must be inclusive to new in-development or in-use things, other wise it will never mean anything else later down the line. If you want it to

Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they?

, at 18:08, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 June 2013 18:56, Dominic Oldman do...@oldman.me.uk wrote: So publishing linked data is easy but creating applications that make use of it is a completely different kettle of fish and very difficult, particularly

Re: The Test of Independent Invention (was: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?)

is inevitable. One thing that I think we can all agree on, is that interoperablity is a good thing. David On 06/22/2013 08:55 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: It took me quite a while to understand this fully. IMHO, it is really worth digesting. I think it also sheds light on how to approach some

Re: Linked Data and the Original Web Proposal

On 24 June 2013 21:56, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: All, I've taken the time to embellish TimBL's original WWW proposal illustration with Linked Data URIs [1]. Why? Because, it seems to be unclear (to many) if the original WWW design had Linked Data in mind all along.

Re: List membership - more women

On 24 June 2013 15:45, Bonnie MacKellar macke...@stjohns.edu wrote: Hi, ** ** I am one of the female lurkers. I am working on a project that is attempting to pull together some of the health/medical datasets. I may have posted once or twice when looking for some information.

Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they?

that apps like this need to be user friendly and well documented. To an extent we rely on volunteer contributions, so any feedback or help is appreciated! :) Best Hugh On 22 Jun 2013, at 18:08, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 June 2013 18:56, Dominic Oldman do

Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they?

On 23 June 2013 15:39, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 June 2013 20:01, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Hi Melvin, I wouldn't really say that Tabulator was suitable for general non technical users. Fair, comment, but that's something we'd like to change

Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications

On 23 June 2013 23:58, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com wrote: On 23/06/13 22:46, Kingsley Idehen wrote: Please, I told you before, and I will tell you again don't try to teach parents how to make babies! Kingsley, your conduct on this list is beyond a joke. I would ask you to

Re: The Great Public Linked Data Use Case Register for Non-Technical End User Applications

On 24 June 2013 01:09, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote: On 23 June 2013 23:46, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 6/23/13 5:36 PM, Barry Norton wrote: Are you confusing Linked Data and Linked Open Data? Of course not! Web-like structured data enhanced with explicit

The Test of Independent Invention (was: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?)

It took me quite a while to understand this fully. IMHO, it is really worth digesting. I think it also sheds light on how to approach some of the topics raised in the last week. [[ *The Test of Independent Invention* There's a test I use for technology which the Consortium is thinking of

Re: RE: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where are they?

On 22 June 2013 18:56, Dominic Oldman do...@oldman.me.uk wrote: So publishing linked data is easy but creating applications that make use of it is a completely different kettle of fish and very difficult, particularly in the way I described. My assumption is that the linked data community is

Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication

On 21 June 2013 17:32, Stephane Fellah fella...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with you David. Unfortunately the title of rating system (Linked Open Data) is often misinterpreted. The first 3 stars are really describing Open Data. The last two are really Linked Data. A better title could be: From

Re: What Does Point Number 3 of TimBL's Linked Data Mean?

On 22 June 2013 01:03, Nathan Rixham nat...@webr3.org wrote: Linked Data is a moving target, it's not Linked Data 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 etc, it's a set of technologies which make it easy to have machine readable data that is interlinked on the web. If Linked Data is built on HTTP currently, then the

Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication

On 20 June 2013 15:37, Courtney, Paul K. paul_court...@dfci.harvard.eduwrote: To be honest, this entire thread has reminded me of the lengthy threads on the ontolog listserv that finally caused me to unsubscribe. I could not characterize those threads as discussions because so many of the

Re: Linked Data discussions require better communication

to them. Kingsley Sincerely Stephane Fellah On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: • Restate/reflect ideas that in other posts that are troubling/puzzling

Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On 19 June 2013 14:09, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Firstly, having now read the threads, I thank you all for a lot of very interesting and thoughtful words. Also, as best I can describe what I think, it seems that David Booth has eloquently said much of what I would say. I'm not

Re: RDF, Linked Data etc : please ping me when it's over ...

On 19 June 2013 14:44, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote: I guess I'm not the only one : I'm about to put a filter rule on my inbox from public-lod AND (contains RDF and Linked Data) = trash No one having a decent full-time job and normal life can have the bandwidth (not even

Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On 18 June 2013 06:44, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote: On 06/17/2013 08:11 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: On 06/17/2013 06:21 PM, Luca Matteis wrote: This still doesn't answer my initial question How do you produce Linked Data without RDF?. Here's the first way (plain 'ol JSON object): {

Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On 18 June 2013 13:43, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 6/18/13 1:01 AM, David Booth wrote: On 06/18/2013 12:05 AM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote: The debate about whether linked data requires RDF is actually a typical example of a wrong formulation in the applicable

Re: 返: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

On 18 June 2013 15:24, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote: On 06/18/2013 08:29 AM, Luca Matteis wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com** wrote: Luckily, I believe only a minority of folks hold the distorted views

Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data

On 17 June 2013 12:02, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: Plus, if you don't have RDF strictly within the definition of Linked Data, what else do you have? Just any generic data that is linked? Isn't that the Web (not Linked Data)? It depends whether or not you consider the web a data

Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data

On 17 June 2013 12:32, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: It depends whether or not you consider the web a data space. Wasn't the whole point of Linked Data to create a Web of Data rather than a Web

Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data

On 17 June 2013 14:34, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: Come on! If you're building something that works like the Web but isn't using HTTP, then it's *not* the Web. It's something else that has similar dynamics to the Web (like, I dunno, a gazillion of other things?). SPDY? On

Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data

On 17 June 2013 14:49, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com wrote: Agreed. It always amuses me to hear how Web/REST is not coupled to HTTP. Applying for a Web job without HTML/HTTP skills is like applying for a Linked Data job without RDF/HTTP. The rest might be interesting to some, but

Re: Linked Data in my Head

On 17 June 2013 15:32, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.comwrote: LINKED DATA IS PEOPLE. LINKED DATA IS YOUR MOM -1 Was that really necessary? ps: kindly don't ban me :)

Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data

On 17 June 2013 23:26, David Wood da...@3roundstones.com wrote: Nicely done, Kingsley! That is an excellent exploration of the boundaries. Yes, it is RDF (of course), but crappy RDF since the predicates are hardly likely to be reused by others or even mapped via owl:sameAs. Yes, it is

Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data

is black. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 June 2013 23:26, David Wood da...@3roundstones.com wrote: Nicely done, Kingsley! That is an excellent exploration of the boundaries. Yes, it is RDF (of course), but crappy RDF since

Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*!

On 13 June 2013 19:19, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote: [Sidebar: A term of art is A word or phrase that has special meaning in a particular context. (The Free Dictionary)] A heated debate has been raging about the accepted meaning of the term Linked Data in the context of the Semantic

Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*!

On 13 June 2013 21:04, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote: Greetings. On 2013 Jun 13, at 19:36, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote: [reordered] So RDF may spring to mind when you say Linked Data, given it's so prevalent, but Linked Data refers to a set of things, RDF is just one of

Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*!

On 13 June 2013 21:34, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote: Again, not sure what the big deal is. It's like asking: Does the term Web imply the use of CSS? Sure it does. It's an important part of the Web as it allows people to style their documents. So is RDF to Linked Data, as it allows

Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*!

On 13 June 2013 21:38, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 6/13/13 3:34 PM, Luca Matteis wrote: Again, not sure what the big deal is. It's like asking: Does the term Web imply the use of CSS? It doesn't. HTML, maybe-ish. Sure it does. It's an important part of the Web as

Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge]

On 11 June 2013 19:59, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote: On 06/11/2013 12:18 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 6/11/13 11:56 AM, David Booth wrote: On 06/11/2013 10:59 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: [ . . . ] many RDF advocates want to conflate Linked Data and RDF. This is technically wrong,

Re: RDF's challenge

On 11 June 2013 21:40, Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com wrote: We have successfully used two different tools in this realm: 1. JSON-LD. This doesn't quite fit your definition, but JSON-LD is an easy to produce and consume RDF serialization. http://www.json-ld.org/ 2. RdfQuery. A

Re: Linked Stuff [was Re: RDF's challenge]

On 11 June 2013 22:51, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote: On 06/11/2013 04:20 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 6/11/13 4:12 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: This is the goal of the Semantic Web: to enable machines to usefully and (semi-)automatically, find, share, combine and process

Re: RDF's challenge

On 11 June 2013 23:59, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote: On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 6/11/13 11:56 AM, David Booth wrote: On 06/11/2013 10:59 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: [ . . . ] many RDF advocates want to conflate Linked Data and RDF. This is technically

Re: There's No Money in Linked Data

On 18 May 2013 04:15, Pascal Hitzler pascal.hitz...@wright.edu wrote: We just finished a piece indicating serious legal issues regarding the commercialization of Linked Data - this may be of general interest, hence the post. We hope to stimulate discussions on this issue (hence the

Re: Business Models, Profitability, and Linked Data

On 7 June 2013 18:52, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: There have been a few recent threads on the LOD and Semantic Web mailing lists that boil down to the fundamental issues of profitability, business models, and Linked Data. Situation Analysis == Business

Re: Petitioning ISWC to allow Web friendly formats

On 6 May 2013 13:33, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote: Hi all, I'd like to invite you to sign the petition International Semantic Web Conference: ISWC calls to allow scientific research submission in Web friendly formats [1]. For the sake of building towards what we care about,

Re: Outdated linkeddata.org website

On 1 May 2013 13:14, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 5/1/13 6:09 AM, Luca Matteis wrote: Dear Hugh, o linkeddata.org could feed off a subset of semanticweb.org, by re-skinning o linkeddata.org might simply lead to semanticweb.org I like the strict separation between

Re: uri for uri

On 1 April 2013 01:13, Christopher Gutteridge c...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising.. Thanks for the pointer! The single most important development in the history of the Semantic

look at this

http://betsofbitco.in/

Re: Shopping for research venues

On 20 March 2013 12:36, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote: Dear community, I would like to know which venues (e.g., conferences, journals) are out there that accepts research documents in (X)HTML+CSS+JavaScript+MathML+**SVG etc. as the primary and final format. On that note, which

Re: Linked SDMX Data

On 15 February 2013 15:51, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: On 2/15/13 8:42 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote: Ahoy hoy, OECD Linked Data: http://oecd.270a.info/ BFS Linked Data: http://bfs.270a.info/ FAO Linked Data: http://fao.270a.info/ Linked SDMX Data:

  1   2   3   >