Excellent response, Kingsley!
On 11/11/2015 6:37 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/15 3:49 PM, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
Some valid points. Two quick remarks:
For me, the Semantic Web vision has always been about clients.
I think the "Semantic Web" has always been about "The
Hi Silvio,
This looks to be tremendously helpful for publishing in leading accepted
academic formats, while accommodating RDF markup. Its claimed features
fit some current needs unfulfilled by other approaches. We will review
with great interest.
Thanks to you and your contributors!
Best,
Hi John,
My thoughts are for DBpedia to stay close to the mission of extracting
quality data from Wikipedia, and no more. That quality extraction is an
essential grease to the linked data ecosystem, and of much major benefit
to anyone needful of broadly useful structured data.
I think both
Hi Adobe lurkers,
Kingsley has just handed you a valuable means to keep users tied to your
technologies:
On 10/6/2014 8:18 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 10/6/14 2:49 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
On 10/06/2014 11:03 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 10/6/14 12:48 PM, Peter F.
We have released version 1.10 of the UMBEL (Upper Mapping and Binding
Exchange Layer) reference concept ontology [1]. This new release is in
preparation for a series of subsequent releases planned over the next
few months that will extend the functionality of the system in important
ways.
Hi Michel,
This is most helpful and interesting. It bears the closest overlap to
what I have been envisioning of any of the options I have seen so far.
The paper was quite informative, but loading the ontology in Protégé
made SIO quite explicit.
Thank you.
I have applied for membership to
://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology/
Cheers,
On Jul 11, 2014 3:47 AM, Mike Bergman m...@mkbergman.com
mailto:m...@mkbergman.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have been looking for an ontology that organizes and describes
possible characteristics or attributes for common entity types
://www.slideshare.net/gangemi/isemantics-key
[2] http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/descriptionandsituation.owl
[3] http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl
On Jul 11, 2014, at 4:42:26 AM , Mike Bergman m...@mkbergman.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have been looking for an ontology that organizes
Hi All,
I have been looking for an ontology that organizes and describes
possible characteristics or attributes for common entity types, such as
what might be found in a key-value pair in Wikipedia infoboxes and such.
I have had no luck finding such a vocabulary or ontology. The closest
10:42 PM, Mike Bergman wrote:
Hi All,
I have been looking for an ontology that organizes and describes
possible characteristics or attributes for common entity types, such as
what might be found in a key-value pair in Wikipedia infoboxes and such.
I don't know if this is quite what you seek
Thanks, Nolan
On 7/10/2014 9:52 PM, Nolan Nichols wrote:
Perhaps take a look at the OBO Relations Ontology [1].
Cheers,
Nolan
[1] http://code.google.com/p/obo-relations/
Hello,
Structured Dynamics is pleased to announce the immediate availability of
the Open Semantic Framework version 3.0.
OSF is a turnkey, enterprise platform based on RDF and OWL that combines
leading third-party open-source engines (Virtuoso, Solr, GATE, OWL API)
with Web services and
+1
Mike
PS Pls end this thread; it is a waste of electrons.
On 6/11/2013 8:33 PM, David Booth wrote:
On 06/11/2013 06:24 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/11/13 6:18 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com
On 6/11/2013 9:46 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/11/13 9:55 PM, Mike Bergman wrote:
+1
Mike,
I am utterly confused about your +1.
Which of the following are you in support of?
1. That RDF is Linked Data?
2. That Linked Data is RDF?
Yes.
What is boring and unnecessary about all
Hi Kingsley,
On 7/20/2012 5:30 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 7/19/12 9:13 PM, Mike Bergman wrote:
+1
On 7/19/2012 6:37 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Remember, this is the Linked Open Data (LOD) forum. We've long past
the issue of *demand driven* over here, re. Linked Data.
There's
Hi Jonathan,
On 3/27/2012 3:27 PM, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Leigh Doddsle...@ldodds.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Jonathan A Reesr...@mumble.net wrote:
...
There is a difference, since what is described could be an IR that
does not have the
As someone who has often commented publicly (and negatively) on matters
of semWeb semantics and httpRange-14, I feel I have an obligation to
offer comment publicly on the various change proposals being put forward
[1].
Despite everyone's acknowledged fatigue about this issue, I think
Hi All,
Structured Dynamics and Ontotext have just released version 1.00
of UMBEL. This version is the first production-grade release of
this open source, reference ontology for the Web.
For more information and downloads, please see http://umbel.org.
In broad terms, here is what is
You may want to look at irON [1] and its commON [2] format. The
specs provide guidance on our approach to your questions.
We use it all the time (as do our clients) and it works great.
Fred Giasson also just completed a dataset append Web service
that integrates with it for incremental
OK, I'll bite ...
On 2/16/2010 8:18 PM, Nathan wrote:
Mike Bergman wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Though I assume not universally shared:
On 2/16/2010 7:32 PM, Nathan wrote:
Peter Ansell wrote:
Hi Nathan,
On 17 February 2010 11:18, Nathannat...@webr3.org wrote:
Hi All,
Other than the obvious
Hi Dave,
Dave Reynolds wrote:
Dave Reynolds wrote:
Jeni Tennison wrote:
I don't know where the best place is to work on this: I guess at some
point it would be good to set up a Wiki page or something that we
could use as a hub for discussion?
I'd suggest setting up a Google Code area
Hi Ryan,
Ryan Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Kavitha Srinivasksrin...@gmail.com wrote:
I put the raw dump of conditional probabilities on an external
website (http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/
pages/iaa.index.html). Go the section on LinkedOpenData and
be interested in your or others' similar ideas.
Mike
[1] http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=483
[2] For example, see references to BBN or Sekine in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Named_Entity_Recognition
[3] http://www.zitgist.com/products/query_builder.html
David
Mike Bergman wrote:
This has been
This has been a classic case of Cool Hand Luke and a failure to
communicate. Indeed, it happens all of the time in this forum.
David comes from a perspective of usability and user interfaces,
granted with a JS bias. Most all of us have recognized his
genius for quite some time, and he is a
David,
Thanks for the guts to stroll into the lion's den.
David Baxter wrote:
Hi all,
We at Cycorp have been publishing owl:sameAs links from our OpenCyc
concepts to WordNet synsets, e.g.
http://sw.opencyc.org/2008/06/10/concept/en/India owl:sameAs
Dan Brickley wrote:
On 23/2/09 22:24, Mike Bergman wrote:
David Baxter wrote:
We at Cycorp have been publishing owl:sameAs links from our OpenCyc
concepts to WordNet synsets, e.g.
http://sw.opencyc.org/2008/06/10/concept/en/India owl:sameAs
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances
Hi LODsters,
We are pleased to provide a LOD 'constellation' diagram [1] of
class-level mappings within open linked datasets. It is meant to
accompany the LOD cloud diagram [2] that our community has been
using for more than a year to great effect to educate the public
about linked data.
really powerful inferencing. Just getting a few right can
be really powerful. . . .
Regards, Mike
Regards,
Gong
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Bergman
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 10:13 AM
To: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: LOD
28 matches
Mail list logo
