On 7/13/11 12:04 AM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
If you are seeking stats re. what I mean re. intertia, just keep track of
what's happening on the schema.org front re. adoption curve.
here are 100+ datasets
If a dataset has not been available in any Linked Data way for 3+ months it
should not appear on the cloud we show people, coloured or not.
It is no more. It has ceased to be. It has expired and gone to meet its maker.
If it had not been nailed to the cloud it would have fallen off. It is an
On 7/12/11 21:33 , Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
Hi out of curiousity
Will you be taking off the diagram those that are NOT online regularly?
How about marking them as having one or more of the following:
1. A dump is available upon request to email
2. A dump is online at URL
3. A SPARQL endpoint
Hi,
On 12 July 2011 18:45, Pablo Mendes pablomen...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear fellow Linked Open Data publishers and consumers,
We are in the process of regenerating the next LOD cloud diagram and
associated statistics [1].
...
This email prompted a discussion about how to the data collection or
Hi LODers,
The Web of Data is by definition an uncontrolled environment, and by nature
constantly evolving. In this respect the cloud diagram is in my opinion a
snapshot of the LOD at a particular moment. Last version is almost
unreadable in a A4 paper and we passed the era of the more dataset we
Re. availability, just a reminder of SPARQL Endpoints Status service
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html
As of today 80% (192/240) endpoints registered at CKAN are up and running.
Monitor grey dots (still alive?) for candidate passed out datasets ...
Bernard
2011/7/13 Leigh
Hi,
On 13 July 2011 13:05, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Re. availability, just a reminder of SPARQL Endpoints Status service
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html
As of today 80% (192/240) endpoints registered at CKAN are up and running.
Monitor grey
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Bernard Vatant
bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Re. availability, just a reminder of SPARQL Endpoints Status service
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html
As of today 80% (192/240) endpoints registered at CKAN are up and running.
Monitor
On 7/13/11 11:36 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
If a dataset has not been available in any Linked Data way for 3+ months it
should not appear on the cloud we show people, coloured or not.
It is no more. It has ceased to be. It has expired and gone to meet its maker.
If it had not been nailed to the
Hi all,
On 13 July 2011 14:11, Leigh Dodds leigh.do...@talis.com wrote:
Hi,
On 13 July 2011 13:05, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Re. availability, just a reminder of SPARQL Endpoints Status service
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html
As of today 80%
On 7/13/11 12:00 PM, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi,
On 12 July 2011 18:45, Pablo Mendespablomen...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear fellow Linked Open Data publishers and consumers,
We are in the process of regenerating the next LOD cloud diagram and
associated statistics [1].
...
This email prompted a
On 7/13/11 1:11 PM, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi,
On 13 July 2011 13:05, Bernard Vatantbernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Re. availability, just a reminder of SPARQL Endpoints Status service
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html
As of today 80% (192/240) endpoints registered at
Hi,
On 13 July 2011 14:30, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Can you ping me or reply to this list with a list of missing SPARQL
endpoints. Alternatively, you bookmark them on del.icio.us using tag:
sparql_endpoint.
Here is my collection:
On 7/13/11 2:34 PM, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi,
On 13 July 2011 14:30, Kingsley Idehenkide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Can you ping me or reply to this list with a list of missing SPARQL
endpoints. Alternatively, you bookmark them on del.icio.us using tag:
sparql_endpoint.
Here is my collection:
Hi out of curiousity
Will you be taking off the diagram those that are NOT online regularly?
Gio
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Pablo Mendes pablomen...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear fellow Linked Open Data publishers and consumers,
We are in the process of regenerating the next LOD cloud diagram and
Giovanni,
Thanks for helping to build a preemptive QA for dataset providers. First,
there is no 'taking off'. The 2007...2010 versions will remain online
forever with the help of web archive.
Second, I assume you refer to the relatively short time span between my
message to the list and the
i meant a much simpler and significant thing. Go in CKAN click on the
LOD tag, then start clicking around datasets.
Many dont work, are offline etc. They have been for weeks or months.
Are you checking these and removing them from the new lod diagram or
will the lod diagram just grow regardless
Many dont work, are offline etc. They have been for weeks or months.
Are you checking these and removing them from the new lod diagram or
will the lod diagram just grow regardless reality?
Fair point, Giovanni. Pablo, I /believe/ Giovanni is referring to a
recent related experiment [1] by
Hi Giovanni,
Will you be taking off the diagram those that are NOT online regularly?
could you please be a bit more precise and clearly say which datasets you
are talking about.
Which datasets do not provide dereferencable URIs anymore?
(Linked Data and the LOD diagram is not about SPARQL
I would think that Giovanni refers to the public tracker CKAN SPARQL Endpoint:
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/
I also would also recommend to remove the endpoints that indeed do
show significant downtime such as 100% downtime 100% of the time for a
consecutive period of more than
Thanks, Thomas.
Giovanni, it was a coreference resolution problem from my side. You meant
'they'=datasets and I read 'they'=people. It was anyhow a possible question
to come by and it's (hopefully) clearer now. Sorry for the confusion.
Now to the intended question.
I will discuss the issue of
Hi Chris,
could you please be a bit more precise and clearly say which datasets you
are talking about.
One example is Semantic Crunchbase (http://cb.semsol.org/).
Which datasets do not provide dereferencable URIs anymore?
None of those seem to work any longer (try any of
On 7/12/11 11:21 PM, Pablo Mendes wrote:
Thanks, Thomas.
Giovanni, it was a coreference resolution problem from my side. You
meant 'they'=datasets and I read 'they'=people. It was anyhow a
possible question to come by and it's (hopefully) clearer now. Sorry
for the confusion.
Now to the
Chris,
i am not interested in specific content of the diagram, but rather i
am interested in understanding what its value of it which depends on
the method you're going to follow in the update. You're answeing this
saying basically there wont be a check for old dead datasets.
I admit never
On 7/12/11 11:33 PM, Thomas Steiner wrote:
(Linked Data and the LOD diagram is not about SPARQL endpoints)
Fair enough. It is related though, according to TimBL's Linked Data
principle #3 (http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html).
Really got to be careful there. SPARQL and RDF are
If you are seeking stats re. what I mean re. intertia, just keep track of
what's happening on the schema.org front re. adoption curve.
here are 100+ datasets
http://sindice.com/search?q=schemanq=fq=class%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2F*sortbydate=1facet.field=domaininterface=guru
started
26 matches
Mail list logo
