As noted on the LOD and POWDER mailing lists in recent days, the revived
303/200 with content-location header debate brought to my attention the
mismatch in the documentation of wdrs:describedby.
Two headlines
=
1. On behalf of the former POWDER WG, I apologise for the confusion
).
Bottom line is that wdrs:describedby was intended to be semantically
identical to @rel describedby, i.e. with no range restriction. Since the
Recommendation and namespace doc in the their present form are ambiguous
it's clearly an error so making an entry on the errata page [1] is
pretty
On 11/5/10 1:41 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
The 303 debate has prompted me to re-look at the definition of
wdrs:describedby - and it's obvious that the POWDER WG (which I
chaired), made an error.
I've begun the process of seeking to change the spec so that the range
restriction on this property
