Thank you so much for your advice and your praise for *simplicity*.
A tribute to Ockam/Okkam i guess ;)
Yann
Le 11/07/2011 00:29, Giovanni Tummarello a écrit :
hi Antoine, Yann all
my advice is to keep it simple and complete.
very simple indeed. Please forget about content negotiation. It
Le 11/07/2011 11:12, Dan Brickley a écrit :
On 7 July 2011 23:17, Yann NICOLASnico...@abes.fr wrote:
Bonjour,
Sudoc [1], the French academic union catalogue maintained by ABES [2], has
just been released as linked open data.
10 million bibliographic records are now available as RDF/XML.
Hi all,We are excited to announce the first release of our RDFaCE WYSIWYM RDFa Content Editor http://aksw.org/Projects/RDFaCERDFaCE is an online RDFa content editor based on TinyMCE. In addition totwo classical views for text authoring (WYSIWYG and HTML source code),RDFaCE supports two
On 7/11/11 10:04 AM, ali khalili wrote:
Hi all,
We are excited to announce the first release of our
RDFaCE WYSIWYM RDFa Content Editor
http://aksw.org/Projects/RDFaCE
RDFaCE is an online RDFa content editor based on TinyMCE. In addition to
two classical views for text authoring
Dear fellow Linked Open Data publishers and consumers,
We are in the process of regenerating the next LOD cloud diagram and
associated statistics [1]. We would like to invite those of you who publish
data sets as Linked Data to join the other ~2000 data sets already in CKAN (
http://ckan.net ) to
Chairs and Team Contact,
(1) This is a 2nd Last Call Working Draft Transition Announcement for
the following Recommendation Track specification:
(2) Document Title and URI
* API for Media Resources 1.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-20110712/
(3) Instructions for providing
Hi out of curiousity
Will you be taking off the diagram those that are NOT online regularly?
Gio
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Pablo Mendes pablomen...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear fellow Linked Open Data publishers and consumers,
We are in the process of regenerating the next LOD cloud diagram and
Giovanni,
Thanks for helping to build a preemptive QA for dataset providers. First,
there is no 'taking off'. The 2007...2010 versions will remain online
forever with the help of web archive.
Second, I assume you refer to the relatively short time span between my
message to the list and the
i meant a much simpler and significant thing. Go in CKAN click on the
LOD tag, then start clicking around datasets.
Many dont work, are offline etc. They have been for weeks or months.
Are you checking these and removing them from the new lod diagram or
will the lod diagram just grow regardless
Many dont work, are offline etc. They have been for weeks or months.
Are you checking these and removing them from the new lod diagram or
will the lod diagram just grow regardless reality?
Fair point, Giovanni. Pablo, I /believe/ Giovanni is referring to a
recent related experiment [1] by
Hi all,
The Callimachus Project (callimachusproject.org) is having a Callimachus Day
on 14 July. Callimachus developers will be on IRC for three hours or so to
help new users get started and answer questions for developers. Details are
given below. Please attend if you are interested.
We
Hi Giovanni,
Will you be taking off the diagram those that are NOT online regularly?
could you please be a bit more precise and clearly say which datasets you
are talking about.
Which datasets do not provide dereferencable URIs anymore?
(Linked Data and the LOD diagram is not about SPARQL
I would think that Giovanni refers to the public tracker CKAN SPARQL Endpoint:
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/
I also would also recommend to remove the endpoints that indeed do
show significant downtime such as 100% downtime 100% of the time for a
consecutive period of more than
Thanks, Thomas.
Giovanni, it was a coreference resolution problem from my side. You meant
'they'=datasets and I read 'they'=people. It was anyhow a possible question
to come by and it's (hopefully) clearer now. Sorry for the confusion.
Now to the intended question.
I will discuss the issue of
Hi Chris,
could you please be a bit more precise and clearly say which datasets you
are talking about.
One example is Semantic Crunchbase (http://cb.semsol.org/).
Which datasets do not provide dereferencable URIs anymore?
None of those seem to work any longer (try any of
On 7/12/11 11:21 PM, Pablo Mendes wrote:
Thanks, Thomas.
Giovanni, it was a coreference resolution problem from my side. You
meant 'they'=datasets and I read 'they'=people. It was anyhow a
possible question to come by and it's (hopefully) clearer now. Sorry
for the confusion.
Now to the
Chris,
i am not interested in specific content of the diagram, but rather i
am interested in understanding what its value of it which depends on
the method you're going to follow in the update. You're answeing this
saying basically there wont be a check for old dead datasets.
I admit never
On 7/12/11 11:33 PM, Thomas Steiner wrote:
(Linked Data and the LOD diagram is not about SPARQL endpoints)
Fair enough. It is related though, according to TimBL's Linked Data
principle #3 (http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html).
Really got to be careful there. SPARQL and RDF are
If you are seeking stats re. what I mean re. intertia, just keep track of
what's happening on the schema.org front re. adoption curve.
here are 100+ datasets
http://sindice.com/search?q=schemanq=fq=class%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2F*sortbydate=1facet.field=domaininterface=guru
started
19 matches
Mail list logo
