Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:41:10 +0530, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the input from Björn I suppose there's no real need for a method
that returns a single element node (assuming implementations make that
optimization). Given that, I propose we
Hi David,
David Håsäther wrote:
On 2007-02-06 14:07, Christophe Jolif wrote:
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Not having heard strong objections, and having had support for
getElementsBySelector() that is at least as strong as anything else,
I think (with my chair's hat) this can be taken
Martijn wrote:
On 12/20/06, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the arguments that was made was also that the existing methods
have
failed, which would make #3 the odd one out and probably #2 as well. I
don't really care what the final name, but it should match the first
Hi Doug,
Doug Schepers wrote:
SVG
JavaScript
Desktop
Firefox 1.0+
I thought SVG was supported since Firefox 1.5 only?
--
Christophe
Jim Ley wrote:
Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In IE you can at least test for .status == 200 to test if things
worked out ok. Even though the statuscode for various errors seem to
be weird to say the least, at least they are different from the
success codes.
I actually think this is how
Jim Ley wrote:
Christophe Jolif [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even though you can always imagine to find solution to workaround it.
I think it is a bad idea to go to 4 without having a clear knowledge
of what the status really is (successful or erroneous). Indeed bad or
null XML can be due to a bug
