On 02/10/09 23:54, Hodges, Jeff wrote:
Instead of adding them all in v1,
we should allow / encourage this kind of experimentation by defining a
forwards-compatible grammar for the STS header.
Agreed, see the thread entitled more flexible ABNF for STS?
That would be a great thing :-) I
Hi Michael,
WebApps is awaiting on a response from WAI before we republish the
Widgets PC specification.
FYI, as I alluded to in my previous email (below), we have created a
new document for conformance checkers:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-pc-cc
Again, I would be happy to collaborate
