Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)

2010-01-26 Thread Jeremy Orlow
(Are these comments going into someone's queue somewhere, or should I be concerned there was no further response? I ask because I'd kind of like to start checking .idl files into WebKit. :-) On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: In general, sounds good to

Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)

2010-01-26 Thread Nikunj Mehta
Hi Jeremy, I have edited the spec to use IDB as the prefix of every interface it defines. Nikunj On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: (Are these comments going into someone's queue somewhere, or should I be concerned there was no further response? I ask because I'd kind of

Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)

2010-01-22 Thread Jeremy Orlow
The interface names in IndexedDB (and to an extent, WebSQLDatabase) are very generic. Surprisingly, the specs only collide via the Database interface (which is why I bring this up), but I'm concerned that names like Cursor, Transaction, and Index (from IndexedDB) are so generic that they're bound

Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)

2010-01-22 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: The interface names in IndexedDB (and to an extent, WebSQLDatabase) are very generic. Surprisingly, the specs only collide via the Database interface (which is why I bring this up), but I'm concerned that names like Cursor, Transaction,

Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)

2010-01-22 Thread Jeremy Orlow
In general, sounds good to me. Note that there already is an IndexedDatabase interface in your spec though. I'd also suggest renaming at least the following: ObjectStore KeyRange Environment DatabaseError At which point, there's not too many interfaces left without the IDB prefix (mostly