On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Christian Reis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:19:04PM -0500, Jesse Pavel wrote:
I've read that timeout functions registered with gtk.timeout_add()
may be called from a separate thread; but is this true even if I
This was a rumor that Jon Nelson brought up, and I
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:52:07PM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
This was a rumor that Jon Nelson brought up, and I have yet to see proof
of it. I *think* your approach is safe, and that only the GTK thread
will be used for all GTK operations, no matter what (after all, it *is*
GTK who is
Jesse Pavel wrote:
Hello,
I've read that timeout functions registered with gtk.timeout_add()
may be called from a separate thread; but is this true even if I
don't initialize threading with gtk.threads_init()? My plan was to
have an independent thread--that never makes GDK or GTK
calls--store
Hello,
I've read that timeout functions registered with gtk.timeout_add()
may be called from a separate thread; but is this true even if I
don't initialize threading with gtk.threads_init()? My plan was to
have an independent thread--that never makes GDK or GTK
calls--store events in a Queue,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:19:04PM -0500, Jesse Pavel wrote:
I've read that timeout functions registered with gtk.timeout_add()
may be called from a separate thread; but is this true even if I
This was a rumor that Jon Nelson brought up, and I have yet to see proof
of it. I *think* your
Is this GTK 1.2 or 2.x?
Ah, I should have mentioned that this is with Gtk 2.
Take care,
Jesse
Christian Reis on January 10, 2003 wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:19:04PM -0500, Jesse Pavel wrote:
I've read that timeout functions registered with gtk.timeout_add()
may be
