Scott Prive wrote:
Tk doesn't need fixing... it needs to be taken behind
the barn and shot in the head.
feels good to know that people appreciate the things
I do...
/F
___
PyKDE mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Scott Prive wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans-Peter Jansen) wrote:
Scott Prive wrote:
[snip]
Well, may have a look on wxPython. At least, the library is free, allows
cross platform development on windows and unix, and has some nice features. Docs
and some (non) free
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Scott Prive wrote:
Does the QPL only "force" this issue on Linux? is my question
Creating software for "internal use" at a company is clearly commercial use and
would be a violation. This leaves a huge gray area, where one could at home
develop "useful" software to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans-Peter Jansen) wrote:
Scott Prive wrote:
[snip]
Well, may have a look on wxPython. At least, the library is free, allows
cross platform development on windows and unix, and has some nice features. Docs and
some (non) free gui builder are available.
Thanks for the
"John J. Lee" wrote:
Isn't it still illegal for a somebody to distribute non-free software that
requires PyQt under the free Qt license?
Sorry, I don't understand this. PyQt doesn't require any particular Qt
license. PyQt is not under the GPL.
Perhaps this may be a debatable
legal point
Dan Parisien wrote:
I doubt they would go out of business. They don't make money from people who
produce free software anyways. Even if a GPL version of Qt was available for
windows, Trolltech would still make money on people building proprietary
software with their kit (I'm sure they
Hi all,
I had the chance to meet Eirik Eng (the president of Troll Tech) at the
french Linux Expo. I didn't know that there where a whole thread on this
list but I have asked him a few questions about PyQt and ohter things.
He is a very nice guy and was in charge of the licensing
Philippe Fremy wrote:
Hi all,
I had the chance to meet Eirik Eng (the president of Troll Tech) at the
french Linux Expo. I didn't know that there where a whole thread on this
list but I have asked him a few questions about PyQt and ohter things.
He is a very nice guy and was in
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Scott Prive wrote:
Forking the UNIX Qt into a Windows DLL branch remains a improbability. The
Free Software guys *don't care* -- they've settled on GTK. The Open Source
people would feel this would be an attack on Troll Tech. So the problem from
my point is, there is
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Phil Thompson wrote:
"John J. Lee" wrote:
Isn't it still illegal for a somebody to distribute non-free software that
requires PyQt under the free Qt license?
Sorry, I don't understand this. PyQt doesn't require any particular Qt
license. PyQt is not under the GPL.
Matt Gerassimoff wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Phil Thompson wrote:
Scott Prive wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
And does this mean the PyQt binary for windows won't be free in the
future? Oh well, Tk it is then.
I believe so, but I'd leave commenting on that to
ender wrote:
phil,
thank you for releasing pyqt, pykde, and sip.
this email is just rude, and i just wanted to say that your work is
appreciated. If people want to update the libaries or develop them they are
free to do so.
I think Matt's email was fair comment - although (in my
Scott Prive wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
Scott Prive wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
[snip..]
Be fair - if somebody said (not that they have) "people won't license
our Qt development tools if you provide one for free" then I would
sympathise with them completely. It is in
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Phil Thompson wrote:
You may say there is no single reason for not continuing the release of
PyQt. My guess: you want to sell copies of Black Addr. I wouldn't buy
it if PyQt was available. I'm not into IDE's that much. You can make
excuses and other reasons.
There is another possibility which may test the GPL and
TrollTech: Someone could build a interface to Qt for Windows without a
commercial license and release it GPL (which it would have to). Then
applications that are free, stay free. I'm not sure how that would affect
TrollTech but my
Matt Gerassimoff wrote:
Phil, it is your choice. I'm just voicing my disappointment. The binary
release of PyQt was only 4 months old (since September). I'm sure you
knew BlackAddr was going to be release by then. The best outcome would be
the company that gave you the binary release
True but that won't change if they aren't exposed to free software. I was
telling my stepfather about Linux (he uses Windows), and the comment I
got was "how do you MAKE people write software for free? Someone has to
pay for it". It's a popular misconception in the Windows space.
Your
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Phil Thompson wrote:
Matt Gerassimoff wrote:
Phil, it is your choice. I'm just voicing my disappointment. The binary
release of PyQt was only 4 months old (since September). I'm sure you
knew BlackAddr was going to be release by then. The best outcome would be
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Matt Gerassimoff wrote:
Then why did TrollTech give you the licence??? If you didn't buy it, but
instead they gave you a copy of Qt, then it would seem to me they
supported release. If you did buy it then you could release a binary
Well, I'm perhaps partly to blame.
Phil Thompson wrote:
Scott Prive wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
[snip..]
Be fair - if somebody said (not that they have) "people won't license
our Qt development tools if you provide one for free" then I would
sympathise with them completely. It is in nobody's interest to put
Trolltech
Matt Gerassimoff wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Phil Thompson wrote:
Scott Prive wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
And does this mean the PyQt binary for windows won't be free in the
future? Oh well, Tk it is then.
I believe so, but I'd leave commenting on that to Phil
Coy Krill wrote:
On Thursday 25 January 2001 03:17 pm, you wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Coy Krill wrote:
You'll find a binary for Python 2.0 on this page...
http://www.thekompany.com/projects/pykde/download.php3?dhtml_ok=1
There's a Qt binary there, but not a Qwt one that I can
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Coy Krill wrote:
You'll find a binary for Python 2.0 on this page...
http://www.thekompany.com/projects/pykde/download.php3?dhtml_ok=1
There's a Qt binary there, but not a Qwt one that I can see - did I miss
it, or did you assume I'm a bad typist? :)
Be aware that
On Thursday 25 January 2001 03:17 pm, you wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Coy Krill wrote:
You'll find a binary for Python 2.0 on this page...
http://www.thekompany.com/projects/pykde/download.php3?dhtml_ok=1
There's a Qt binary there, but not a Qwt one that I can see - did I miss
it, or
24 matches
Mail list logo
