Hello,
Yannick Gingras wrote:
First things first, I need to pick an authentication and authorization
solution. Last time I checked, around December, Authkit had a fancy
decorator syntax but it was a bit ill documented and featured many
strange way of authentication that obscured the most
Ian Bicking wrote:
It's still quite young, but worth checking out:
http://svn.repoze.org/repoze.who/trunk/
How many people are working on it? Will it not end like AuthKit because
no one writes plugin for it? You can write handlers/plugins for AuthKit
as well BTW.
Regards,
Dalius
..
who can fix this ?
The error message as below
D:\dev\project\znet\zsitepaster create -t pylons zsite version=0.1 sqlalchemy=t
rue template_engine=mako zip_safe=true
Selected and implied templates:
pylons#pylons Pylons application template
Variables:
egg: zsite
On Mar 28, 2008, at 12:18 AM, 张沈鹏(电子科大 毕/就业倒计
时...) wrote:
..
who can fix this ?
The error message as below
Looks like you might have gotten a copy of the tarball, rather than a
full checkout. The tarball installs don't work, you'll need to grab
the tarball itself, untar it, then
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Ben Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like you might have gotten a copy of the tarball, rather than a
full checkout. The tarball installs don't work, you'll need to grab
the tarball itself, untar it, then run: python setup.py develop,
inside it.
On Mar 28, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
Looks like they did what? What's a tarball install?
Tarball install, that is, it grabbed the pylons.tar.gz (tarball)
archive from the Mercurial repo, and tried to install it (tarball
install). In such an install, setuptools fails to see all
This discussion shows Pylons needs some kind of flexible but standard
system of authentication authorization. It has also been clear from
the past several months that AuthKit provides *a* unified solution for
both issues, but it has not gained sufficient acceptance from the
Pylons community to
On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:19 PM, johnnyice wrote:
Has anyone been able to get unittesting/nose to work with Pylons
0.9.6.0?
Why not upgrade to 0.9.6.1? That x.x.x.1 is there to reflect a bug-fix
and zero incompatibility changes.
Cheers,
Ben
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
I'm releasing Routes 1.8 today, it has a few fixes for some unicode
bugs, but the main reason for the announcement is that how
map.resource works is being altered in a way that may break hard-coded
links.
Previously, Routes used a ';' mark for an action in map.resource, like:
if only it were that simple. i work on a classified system and all
new software (even upgrades) has to go through a security code check.
we will be moving to the latest and greatest this summer, but not this
week. sigh...
any help with 0.9.6.0 is appreciated though :)
thanks
On Mar 28,
yay!
iv wondered every day this week when you would release :)
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Ben Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm releasing Routes 1.8 today, it has a few fixes for some unicode
bugs, but the main reason for the announcement is that how
map.resource works is being
On Mar 28, 2008, at 2:31 PM, johnnyice wrote:
if only it were that simple. i work on a classified system and all
new software (even upgrades) has to go through a security code check.
we will be moving to the latest and greatest this summer, but not this
week. sigh...
any help with 0.9.6.0 is
Some time ago I wrote this up as a proposal for the basic way
authentication can work in WSGI:
http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/simple_authentication
I think most of the systems work pretty much like this, but I don't know
for sure.
Mike Orr wrote:
This discussion shows Pylons needs some
Hey Ben,
Thanks for the quick response. I tried getting it to work with what
you said, but it was still giving me problems. As it turns out, we
were actually able to get pylons 0.9.6.1 approved (I had written it
down for submission a few weeks ago, but didn't think we'd actually
get it
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This discussion shows Pylons needs some kind of flexible but standard
system of authentication authorization. It has also been clear from
the past several months that AuthKit provides *a* unified solution for
both
15 matches
Mail list logo
