Re: credit card or other payment gateway software

believe, and I rolled my own library for accessing the Authorize.NET CIM in just a day or two using mako and httplib. You should be able to do the same. Best of luck to you -- -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received

Re: Storing CC Info: public/private key best option?

has a high-quality web service API: http://authorize.net/solutions/merchantsolutions/merchantservices/cim/ It took me about a day to interface with Authorize.NET CIM, and I can't recommend it highly enough. Good luck -- -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org

Re: Classic URL Style

template. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group

Re: Quickest way to use Elixir with a Pylons 0.9.6 project.

request in a small WSGI middleware if there were no exceptions, but you can also do it manually after any update/create occurs, or in your base controller. If its still not working, let us know over on the Elixir mailing list, and maybe we can help you over there. -- Jonathan LaCour http

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

! -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

, and it is indeed very nice. Good work Mike and Mike. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

? -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

, and all of the cases he enumerated in his last email (required, requiresNew, supports, mandatory, etc), but I think the three things above will give a good set of building blocks for making those things easy to deal with. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

thing about the approach that we have taken thus far is that you can mix TG-style object-dispatching controllers and regular Pylons controllers if you like. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

it from him or did he borrow it from them? You'll have to ask Rick where he came up with the idea, all I know is that I find it to be extremely useful! -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

(dburi=config.dburi) So, I am a big +1 on such a beast. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss

Re: Turbogears now based on Pylons!

before I finally grok it. But, to be fair, StackedObjectProxy does the same thing ;) How should we move forward with this? Is this the type of thing that the DB-SIG cares about? Or should the discussion remain here? -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org