On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:44:24AM -0600, Michael Merickel wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
My use-case is
different -- to allow User object to be attached on request without
touching
database (user id is encoded in authc cookie), but I think it
Great Job Michael,
this simplify a lot the concept and the design I use with my applications
with user data.
Do you think I can write a class to retrieve data from the beaker session
if it is loaded instead of dbconn? In case of None I can proceed with
dbconn..is this the best approach to
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, thank you, that would work too, but already has custom Query class
with
othe goodies and also want to access user's id as request.user.id.
That's fine of course. request.user.id works with this pattern though, just
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:09:19PM -0600, Michael Merickel wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Andrey Popp wrote:
Yeah, thank you, that would work too, but already has custom Query class
with othe goodies and also want to access user's id as request.user.id.
That's fine of course.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Michael Merickel mmeri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
My use-case is
different -- to allow User object to be attached on request without
touching
database (user id is encoded in authc cookie), but I
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 11:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Michael Merickel mmeri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
My use-case is
different -- to allow User object to be attached on request without
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 11:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Michael Merickel mmeri...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
My use-case is
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:42:04AM +0400, Andrey Popp wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:09:36PM -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
Second, how can I generate URLs to resources without loading the objects
through this interface? The home page queries the 30 most recent incidents
and displays links to
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
My use-case is
different -- to allow User object to be attached on request without
touching
database (user id is encoded in authc cookie), but I think it should work
for
constructing lazy resource graph as well.
In
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 20:22 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andrey Popp
You could use static routes to generate your URLs. These are routes that do
not match at request time and are only used for URL generation.
http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/latest/narr/urldispatch.html#static-route-narr
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
You could use static routes to generate your URLs. These are routes that do
not match at request time and are only used for URL generation.
I'm weighing whether to use traversal in a limited way, and whether
the benefits would outweigh the costs.
I'm converting a Pylons application that has two database-related
routes for read-only access:
/incidents/{id} = Incident ORM class
/entries/{id} = Entry ORM class
I can use URL dispatch
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:09:36PM -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
I'm weighing whether to use traversal in a limited way, and whether
the benefits would outweigh the costs.
I'm converting a Pylons application that has two database-related
routes for read-only access:
/incidents/{id} = Incident
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:09:36PM -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
I'm weighing whether to use traversal in a limited way, and whether
the benefits would outweigh the costs.
I'm converting a Pylons application that has two database-related
routes for read-only access:
/incidents/{id} = Incident ORM
Oops, sorry for spamming list...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
And that raises another issue, the incident resource doesn't really
exist. I.e., /incident should return an error, not connect to a
regular view or default view. How do I do that? Or how do I make the
default view be not
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
And that raises another issue, the incident resource doesn't really
exist. I.e., /incident should return an error, not connect to a
regular view or default view. How do I
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
And that raises another issue, the incident resource doesn't really
exist. I.e., /incident should
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 20:22 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:13 -0800, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andrey Popp 8may...@gmail.com wrote:
And that raises another issue, the incident
20 matches
Mail list logo
