Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Marcin Kasperski
redirect routes need some detailed design. a) There should be an easy way to define internal redirects. Important thing here is that the destination url should be defined using routes by itself. I am not sure about the syntax, but url_for need not be available at the moment (for

Re: SqlAlchemy logging - sqlalchemy.echo*

2007-11-23 Thread Marcin Kasperski
PS2. Just tried to change to this: sqlalchemy.echo=False sqlalchemy.echo_pool=False and indeed I have no logs printed with above... Those are simply ignored, =True would not work too. They would be used if you defined your database url as sqlalchemy.url (prefix before .echo must match prefix

Fwd: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Mike Orr
On Nov 23, 2007 6:19 AM, Paweł Stradomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I think the current solution (function being passed by the framework to routes) is better, as it gives more flexibility. Throwin an exception would force just a single way of informing the framework about redirects - and

Concurrent Request Problem

2007-11-23 Thread David Snopek
Hi Everyone, I am currently having a problem, where if two requests come into my server at almost the same time, I end up with a 500 server error. I am using paster serve and egg:Paste#http on Pylons 0.9.6 and Paste 1.4.2. The traceback I get ends with: Module paste.httpserver:166 in

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Jose Galvez
please don't get rid of url_for(controller='foo', action='bar') I use that all the time, and although I know that url_for('named route') does look more elegant, if you get rid of the former behavior, then we're left having to name all of our controller/actions pairs. To me this looks like

Fwd: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Mike Orr
On Nov 23, 2007 7:34 AM, Paweł Stradomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: W liście Mike Orr z dnia piątek 23 listopada 2007: On Nov 23, 2007 6:19 AM, Paweł Stradomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I think the current solution (function being passed by the framework to routes) is better, as it

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Paweł Stradomski
W liście Mike Orr z dnia piątek 23 listopada 2007: On Nov 23, 2007 5:46 AM, Paweł Stradomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: W liście Marcin Kasperski z dnia piątek 23 listopada 2007: redirect routes need some detailed design. If we had a separate redirect layer, where would it reside? As a

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Mike Orr
On Nov 23, 2007 5:46 AM, Paweł Stradomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: W liście Marcin Kasperski z dnia piątek 23 listopada 2007: redirect routes need some detailed design. I think that this does not belong to routes - but to pylons in general. In fact I believe that redirect function in routes

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Paweł Stradomski
W liście Marcin Kasperski z dnia piątek 23 listopada 2007: redirect routes need some detailed design. a) There should be an easy way to define internal redirects. Important thing here is that the destination url should be defined using routes by itself. I am not sure about the syntax,

Re: Bug about substitution of _ (gettext) in 'Error Traceback' console

2007-11-23 Thread Graham Higgins
On Nov 22, 3:38 pm, Tomasz Nazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I have found some strange behaviour in Pylons and it is repeatable. It is related to _ (gettext) function and having debug sessions with nice Pylons 'Error Traceback' console I saw the same problem (using Pylons trunk). I

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Ian Bicking
Mike Orr wrote: On Nov 23, 2007 5:46 AM, Paweł Stradomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: W liście Marcin Kasperski z dnia piątek 23 listopada 2007: redirect routes need some detailed design. I think that this does not belong to routes - but to pylons in general. In fact I believe that redirect

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Mike Orr
On Nov 23, 2007 4:30 AM, Marcin Kasperski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: c) In case of internal redirects it may make sense to handle 'invisible redirect' (just picking the destination object using the redirected-to route without generating any redirect to the browser) as one of the

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Paweł Stradomski
W liście Mike Orr z dnia piątek 23 listopada 2007: On Nov 23, 2007 6:19 AM, Paweł Stradomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I think the current solution (function being passed by the framework to routes) is better, as it gives more flexibility. Throwin an exception would force just a

you have a problem about send receive file ?

2007-11-23 Thread pishate chond
New Program Send Big File Fast and Easy Apply For FREE!!! WHO WE ARE YouSendIt is the No. 1 digital file delivery company serving business and individuals businesses who want a easy, secured, reliable and faster way to SEND, RECEIVE and TRACK DIGITAL FILES. YOUSENDIT SOLUTION We replace the

Re: Routes user survey

2007-11-23 Thread Ben Bangert
On Nov 23, 2007, at 1:37 AM, Mike Orr wrote: A few of us have been kicking around ideas for improving Routes. I've got an API proposal at http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/routes/Proposed+Changes I'd like some feedback from those who use Routes heavily on whether you use the less-common