Hello, there.
I'm just wondering where I should place the dojo folder on my project.
I have created a project called myapp. And one of its sub-folders is
also called myapp where you can find things like templates,
controllers, etc.
I'm pretty new to both pylons and dojo. Any help would be
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Chris Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turns out easy_install PasteDeploy installs to
site-packages/PasteDeploy-1.3.1-py2.5.egg/paste/deploy instead of
site-package/paste/deploy. Not sure why that's the default behavior...
It's installing it as an egg. It
Previously Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 13:03 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I am trying to figure out what the best practices for dealing with
static resources such as CSS, Javascript and images are. With a
default pylons setup every request goes through two StaticURLParser
Previously Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Read:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationIssues
Not sure why you want run a single thread. From memory would only want
to do that if trying to attach gdb to daemon process and debug at C
code level.
I tried to run with a single thread
On Jun 17, 6:55 pm, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Read:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationIssues
Not sure why you want run a single thread. From memory would only want
to do that if trying to attach gdb to daemon
Previously Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Is Paste#evalerror the same as EvalException or something different?
It's an entry point which maps to
paste.evalexception.middleware.make_eval_exception which indeed sets up
EvalException.
Looking at the code I must have misremembered: it does not support a
On Jun 17, 7:24 pm, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Is Paste#evalerror the same as EvalException or something different?
It's an entry point which maps to
paste.evalexception.middleware.make_eval_exception which indeed sets up
EvalException.
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 10:36 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Cliff Wells wrote:
I usually just setup Nginx to handle whatever location my static content
is at. It doesn't matter if Routes is setup to handle that location as
the request never reaches Pylons.
How do you do
El mar, 17-06-2008 a las 04:33 -0700, Cliff Wells escribió:
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 10:36 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Cliff Wells wrote:
I usually just setup Nginx to handle whatever location my static content
is at. It doesn't matter if Routes is setup to handle that
Previously Antonio Beamud Montero wrote:
El mar, 17-06-2008 a las 04:33 -0700, Cliff Wells escribió:
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 10:36 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Cliff Wells wrote:
I usually just setup Nginx to handle whatever location my static content
is at. It
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 14:23 +0200, Antonio Beamud Montero wrote:
I use the url_for for all static content, and with mod_wsgi all is
transparent (thanks G. Dumpleton :), doesn't matter where you put your
web root.
I have all my static content urls hardcoded, I was not able to figure
out how
Sorry I am a completely newbie to Pylons, Python, and I'm trying to
built a web page with pylons..
so i got a page setup and have it query to my database for
searching..
query is fine when user enter the correct arguments
but when they are not
below is a pylons pages with error log
class
Just trying to figure out the best combination for pylons:
- Apache / Lighttpd
- FCGI / Proxy / WSGI
All the information I've found about relative performance seems to be
rather outdated. I've played with Apache + FCGI and mod_wsgi quite a
bit and it seems that FCGI is quite a lot faster. Is
i have this routing set up
/user/id
/user/id/project
if you went to www.myhost.com/user/id, you'll see a page with a link
on it generated by h.url_for() containing user/id/project thus
bringing you to www.myhost.com/user/id/project
i now want to map a custom domain that my webserver would
create your own url_for function in helpers, and just wrap url_for
with it.
ie:
lib/helpers
def custom_url_for( name ):
domain = getDomain
if domain == 'a':
return '%s/%s' % ( url_for(name) , 'a' )
elif domain == 'b':
return '%s/%s' % ( url_for(name) , 'b' )
thanks.
the disadvantage to your approach is that it requires my webapp to
have knowledge about the domain pointing to it.
however, i think i can modify it a bit, such that my custom_url_for()
strips off the paths that are hidden during the url.rewrite done by
the webserver.
that way i can
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
I'm using the jsonify decorator. It'd be nice if that decorator were
updated to *automatically* support the jsonp parameter
http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/12/05/remote-json-jsonp/.
Hence, if I request a URL like
http://localhost:5000/api/service?jsonp=foo,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
I'm using the jsonify decorator. It'd be nice if that decorator were
updated to *automatically* support the jsonp parameter
http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/12/05/remote-json-jsonp/.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
I'm using the jsonify decorator. It'd be nice if that decorator were
updated to *automatically* support the jsonp
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
I'm using the jsonify decorator. It'd be nice if that decorator were
updated to *automatically* support the jsonp parameter
i've included my custom url_for() function below.
since the point of the custom domain mappings is to 'hide' a
controller from the URL, the function exploits this when rewriting
urls returned by h.url_for().
if the request_uri string contains a reference to the controller, then
we are not using
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
I'm using the jsonify decorator. It'd be nice if that decorator were
updated to *automatically*
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The option order in webhelpers.html.tags.select() has changed from
[(label, value)] to [(value, label)]. This matches most real-world
lists including dict.items() where the dict is {id : label}. It's the
opposite of the old
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The option order in webhelpers.html.tags.select() has changed from
[(label, value)] to [(value, label)]. This matches most real-world
lists
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Cliff Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 14:26 -0700, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 13:03 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I am trying to figure out what the best practices for dealing with
static resources such as CSS, Javascript
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Agustín (Cucho) Villena
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
At work we need to add the content-length header in all our
responses, but we don't want to hack any method in our controllers to
do that.
Is there any way to factor out this behaviour in a single place?
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 1:12 PM, KJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would Pylons be a good choice for implementing a JSON-RPC-based web
service?
If yes, can someone point me to a good example? (Actually, I'd be
interested in seeing examples of any Pylons-based web service, even if
it doesn't use
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The option order in webhelpers.html.tags.select() has changed from
28 matches
Mail list logo
