Christian Heimes wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
One of the nice features of 3.0 is that differences between classes
defined in C and Python (other than speed) are mostly erased or hidden
from the view of a Python programmer.
However, there are still sometimes surprising and quite visible
-On [20080904 16:22], C. Titus Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I agree. I like bsddb for just this reason and I'd like to continue
being able to use it! I think that there are many reasons why having
such a thing in the stdlib is really useful and I also think it's worth
exploring the
Terry Reedy wrote:
In particular, built-in functions, in spite of of being labeled
'builtin_function_or_method', are not usable as methods because they
lack the __get__ method needed to bind function to instance.
They're not usable as Python-level instance methods, but they're
definitely
On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:10 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
I have to say I've never had problems with a stock install of Python
on
either Mac OS X or Windows (shockingly enough :). I think this is
good
advice for applications that rely on external libraries, but I just
don't see any problems with
-On [20080905 12:34], Kevin Teague ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
However, all does not seem to be right with the bsddb module on the
system Python 2.5 on Mac OS X 10.5:
import bsddb
[snip]
ImportError: No module named _bsddb
The bsddb module is built separately from Python within FreeBSD's
Hi all,
I'm new to this group and the Python language as such. I stumbled on
it when I joined a project to build a rich network library for C++,
which in turn uses Python and its CGI HTTP server implementation as
part of its unit test suite.
We're having a little trouble when serving a text file
Hello Kim,
Thanks for your post. The source code control used for Python is Subversion.
Patches submitted to this list will unfortunately get lost. Please post
the bug report along with your comments and patch to the Python bug tracker:
http://bugs.python.org/
Michael Foord
Kim Gräsman
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org writes:
Here are the issues I'm not comfortable with deferring:
3640 test_cpickle crash on AMD64 Windows build
There is a patch by Amaury which needs review.
874900 threading module can deadlock after fork
I've made a patch which needs review.
Here's an interesting blog post comparing Python performance of various versions
from 2.2.3 upto the latest 3.0 beta.
http://www.ogre.com/node/147
The fact that only Mandelbrot calculation (a hardly representative benchmark for
a high-level dynamic language such as Python) has become
At 1:19 PM +0100 9/5/08, Michael Foord wrote:
Hello Kim,
Thanks for your post. The source code control used for Python is Subversion.
Patches submitted to this list will unfortunately get lost. Please post
the bug report along with your comments and patch to the Python bug tracker:
issue1040026 os.times() is bogus won't be fixed?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trent, are you available to look at the ?spurious? timeout failures in
bsddb replication code in the Windows buildbot?.
Ten seconds timeout should be plenty enough. I can't debug any MS
Windows issue myself; this is a Microsoft-free environment.
-
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Here's an interesting blog post comparing Python performance of various
versions
from 2.2.3 upto the latest 3.0 beta.
http://www.ogre.com/node/147
The fact that only Mandelbrot calculation (a hardly representative benchmark
for
a high-level dynamic language such
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (08/29/08 - 09/05/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2023 open (+35) / 13586 closed (+21) / 15609 total (+56)
Open issues with patches: 642
With 2.6rc1 at the doors people are asking if xmlrpclib will be able
to communicate through a proxy? It causes bzr and bugzilla tools to
fail if used behind firewall, and there is no easy workaround for
users.
http://bugs.python.org/issue648658
--
--anatoly t.
I was wondering, when new installers will be published? I made one on my
own ( see http://lrn.1986.li/other/python-2.6.14127-x86.msi ), but i am
not sure about it's correctness.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
In a checkout, site.py is currently responsible for adding the
distutils extension module builddir to sys.path. Usually, this is
unproblematic. However, when the initialization code needed by site
(in this case the standard io streams and the builtin open) relies on
C modules added from the
Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition at gmail.com writes:
That options as I see it are:
1. Switch the initialization order back to the original (io streams
first) and compile _bytesio and _stringio directly into the Python
binary. This is probably the easiest option.
Since io.py imports
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition at gmail.com writes:
That options as I see it are:
1. Switch the initialization order back to the original (io streams
first) and compile _bytesio and _stringio directly into the Python
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
1. Switch the initialization order back to the original (io streams
first) and compile _bytesio and _stringio directly into the Python
binary. This is probably the easiest option.
Oh, the modules are still shared libraries? That's clearly a mistake. It
makes no sense
Hello,
techtonik wrote:
With 2.6rc1 at the doors people are asking if xmlrpclib will be able
to communicate through a proxy? It causes bzr and bugzilla tools to
fail if used behind firewall, and there is no easy workaround for
users.
http://bugs.python.org/issue648658
It's very unlikely
Kevin Teague wrote:
There can be subtle differences between a stock Python and the system
Python on Mac OS X 10.5.
Also there can be different versions of Python installed
in different versions of MacOSX. So if you distribute an app
that relies on the system Python, at the least you have
to
Terry Reedy wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-09-02 23:14, Terry Reedy wrote:
An alternative to manipulating PATH would be to make and add to the
Start Menu a Command Prompt shortcut, call it Command Window or
something, that starts in the Python directory. Then one could enter
23 matches
Mail list logo
