On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:54, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Lennart is missing that you just need to use the same encoding
+ surrogateescape (or stick with bytes) for decoding the byte strings that
you are comparing.
You lost me here. I need to do this for what?
//Lennart
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:17, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I think the whole blacklist example is artificial. The string in the
blacklist is actually a Chinese hello greeting, so it surely isn't
the string being blacklisted. For proper blacklisting, you would likely
use substring
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/29/2011 2:23 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Not sure how real the security risk is here:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
Basically he is saying that if you store a list of blacklisted files
with names encoded in
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org writes:
In case you missed it, there are now *three* Python modes. Tim Peters'
original and best (in my completely unbiased opinion wink) python-mode.el
which is still being developed, the older but apparently removed from Emacs
python.el and the 'new' (so I've
2011/3/29 Python tracker roundup-ad...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za:
The node specified by the designator in the subject of your message
(22663) does not exist.
Subject was: [issue22663]
Aha.
This email was probably generated by a commit hook because
this changeset
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Nick Stinemates nstinema...@gmail.com wrote:
This is really great to hear and something I would be hugely interested in
contributing to.
Lurking has paid off :)
Nick
Once I get the machine in place, and the team engaged, I am sure
they'll be looking for help.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
I don't see your comment on the blog post. So either the author is
moderating comments and hasn't seen yours yet (likely) or they don't want
disagreement in their comments. ;)
My comment was sitting in the moderation
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:17:05 +1100
Mark Hammond mhamm...@skippinet.com.au wrote:
On 30/03/2011 12:09 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:45 +1100, Mark Hammondmhamm...@skippinet.com.au
wrote:
I'm wondering if it is a reasonable idea to have .hgignore exclude all
files
On 3/29/2011 12:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The possible flaw in python is this: Code like the blog poster wrote passes
python3 without an error or a warning. This gives the programmer no
feedback that they're doing something wrong until it actually bites them in
the foot in deployed code.
Hi,
I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom buildbots, here are
some remarks and issues.
The form still refers to SVN ('Branch to build' is relative to
http://svn.python.org/projects/python.) = the branch is relative to
hg.python.org/
I cannot write # in the branch field to
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:59:02 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
I cannot write # in the branch field to specify... the branch (only
the repository). If the branch contains #, the request looks to be
ignored (without any warning/error). I merged my faulthandler branch
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 17:59 +0200, Victor Stinner a écrit :
I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom buildbots, here are
some remarks and issues.
Oh, I forgot something: there is an error on hg purge.
Example on a Windows buildbot:
C:\Program Files\Mercurial\hg.EXE purge
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:11:53 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 17:59 +0200, Victor Stinner a écrit :
I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom buildbots, here are
some remarks and issues.
Oh, I forgot something: there is an error
On 3/30/2011 2:57 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
http://blog.omega-prime.co.uk/?p=107
I posted link to this as comment, with my summary of thread.
I don't see your comment on the blog post. So either the author is
moderating comments and hasn't seen yours yet (likely)
My comment and
On Mar 30, 2011, at 09:43 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org writes:
In case you missed it, there are now *three* Python modes. Tim Peters'
original and best (in my completely unbiased opinion wink) python-mode.el
which is still being developed, the older but apparently
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 09:43 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org writes:
In case you missed it, there are now *three* Python modes. Tim Peters'
original and best (in my completely unbiased opinion wink) python-mode.el
Victor Stinner wrote:
Le jeudi 24 mars 2011 à 13:22 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
BTW: Why do you think that %.100s is not supported in
PyErr_Format() in Python 2.x ? PyString_FromFormatV()
does support this. The change to use Unicode error strings
introduced the problem, since
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:00:22 +0200
ezio.melotti python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/f722956afeac
changeset: 405:f722956afeac
user:Ezio Melotti
date:Tue Mar 29 22:00:13 2011 +0300
summary:
Add a table of contents to the FAQ.
Could it be
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
setup at:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
Regards
Antoine.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:59:02 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing my faulthandler repository on the custom
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
setup at:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
Regards
Antoine.
that's awesome. should we document how to donate/add a buildbot
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:14:10 -0400
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
setup at:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
Regards
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:14:10 -0400
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous
The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a
tracker page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a
second it blinks and redisplays with the edit form hidden. This is so
obnoxious to me that I no longer want to visit the tracker. Then I have
to find and
I was wondering if it might be possible to have a channel (message
here, email to a list of slave owners or whatever) to mention when the
set of builders for the slaves is getting adjusted? A new builder
tree can burn a good deal of disk space in some cases for example
(each tree adds in the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:36:43AM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:54, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Lennart is missing that you just need to use the same encoding
+ surrogateescape (or stick with bytes) for decoding the byte strings that
you are
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a tracker
page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a second it
blinks and redisplays with the edit form hidden. This is so obnoxious to me
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a tracker
page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a second it
blinks and redisplays with the edit form hidden. This is so obnoxious to me
that I no
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting - it comes straight up with the folded screen for me, no
flickering at all.
I didn't get any flicker either and my first impression of the change
was also positive -- I usually skip straight to the comments the
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:54:41 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The tracker was recently changed so that when I click on a link to a tracker
page, the page is properly displayed, but then a fraction of a second it
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
setup at: http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
Jesse that's awesome. should we document how to donate/add a buildbot
Jesse somewhere in the same section (or alongside)?
I must admit, it wasn't
Hi,
I pushed my faulthandler module into the default branch (Python 3.3).
Since one week, I fixed a lot of bugs (platform issues), improved the
tests and Antoine wrote a new implementation of dump_backtraces_later()
using a thread (instead of SIGALRM+alarm()). It should now work on all
platforms
On 3/30/2011 7:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
There's a lot of noise but that noise is useful. I find the
natural language summary to be much too terse and doesn't make it easy
to visualize said information as opposed to the form fields.
Yes, there is a good reason why database records are
On 3/30/2011 6:39 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Really, surrogates are a red herring to this whole issue. The issue is that
the original code was trying to compare two different transformations of
byte sequences and expecting them to be equal. Let's say that you have the
following byte value::
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:54:41 +1000, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
If someone actually considers this a desired feature, after using it, then
please add a field on the profile page to select autofolding or not. Also,
Hi,
There are a couple of changes I'd like to make and would like some
guidance on policy:
http://bugs.python.org/issue6498 is a documentation bug which exists in
Python 2.6 and later. The patch in that bug touches the docs and a
comment in one source file. Is it acceptable to push that
35 matches
Mail list logo
