and will you complain if we don't provide a custom cython
hacks? (like providing extra type information)
I don't consider providing extra type information a hack. Remember that
they
are only used for additional speed-ups in cases where the author is
smarter
than the compiler.
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch dasdas...@googlemail.com wrote:
1. Definition of the benchmark suite. This will entail contacting
developers of Python
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.ukwrote:
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Right now, we are talking about building speed.python.org to test
the speed of python
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.ukwrote:
*some* good benchmarks in place (and the pypy ones are good ones).
Agreed. The PyPy ones are good.
So I'm still with Jesse on this one. If there is any discussion phase as
part of the Gsoc project it should be
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 07/04
