On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed,
Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:39:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:39:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 07/04/2011
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote:
1. Definition of the benchmark suite.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed,
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts.
On 08/04/2011 11:18, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
[snip...]
So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython
should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 13:37:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython
should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing Cython and
adding
two lines to site.py.
can you provide a simple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and
run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to include is going
to make it hard to make progress. We can have fun with
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and
run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to
and will you complain if we don't provide a custom cython
hacks? (like providing extra type information)
I don't consider providing extra type information a hack. Remember that
they
are only used for additional speed-ups in cases where the author is
smarter
than the compiler.
On 4/8/2011 11:32 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
an interpreter. For the purposes of benchmarking, the distinction
between compiler and interpreter, as some one said above, 'dubious'.
I agree. We should be comparing 'Python execution systems'. My
impression is that some of what Cython does in
I talked to Fijal about my project last night, the result is that
basically the project as is, is not that interesting because the means
to execute the benchmarks on multiple interpreters are currently
missing.
Another point we talked about was that porting the benchmarks would
not be very useful
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch dasdas...@googlemail.com wrote:
1. Definition of the benchmark suite. This will entail contacting
developers of Python
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz scop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch dasdas...@googlemail.com wrote:
1. Definition of the
On 06/04/2011 17:52, DasIch wrote:
Hello Guys,
I would like to present my proposal for the Google Summer of Code,
concerning the idea of porting the benchmarks to Python 3.x for
speed.pypy.org. I think I have successfully integrated the feedback I
got from prior discussions on the topic and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 04:28 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz scop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed,
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Right now, we are talking about building speed.python.org to test
the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another
- cython *is not* an interpreter.
Cython is out of scope for this.
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Right now, we are talking about building speed.python.org to test
the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another
- cython *is not* an interpreter.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.ukwrote:
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Right now, we are talking about building speed.python.org to test
the speed of python
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk mailto:fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.ukwrote:
*some* good benchmarks in place (and the pypy ones are good ones).
Agreed. The PyPy ones are good.
So I'm still with Jesse on this one. If there is any discussion phase as
part of the Gsoc project it should be
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On
Hello Guys,
I would like to present my proposal for the Google Summer of Code,
concerning the idea of porting the benchmarks to Python 3.x for
speed.pypy.org. I think I have successfully integrated the feedback I
got from prior discussions on the topic and I would like to hear your
opinion.
27 matches
Mail list logo
