On 10/26/2010 07:11 PM, Peter Ingebretson wrote:
The main argument is that preserving immutable objects increases the
complexity of remapping and does not actually solve many problems.
The primary reason for objects to be immutable is so that their
comparison operators and hash value can remain
On 26 Oct, 11:31 pm, pinge...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, exar...@twistedmatrix.com
exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
This can be implemented with ctypes right now (I half did
it several years ago).
Jean-Paul
Is there a trick to doing it this way, or are you suggesting
building a
On 10/26/2010 07:04 AM, Peter Ingebretson wrote:
I have a patch that adds a new function to the gc module. The gc.remap()
function uses the tp_traverse mechanism to find all references to any keys
in a provided mapping, and remaps these references in-place to instead point
to the value
2010/10/26 Peter Ingebretson pinge...@yahoo.com:
I have a patch that adds a new function to the gc module. The gc.remap()
function uses the tp_traverse mechanism to find all references to any keys
in a provided mapping, and remaps these references in-place to instead point
to the value
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Hrvoje Niksic hrvoje.nik...@avl.com wrote:
What about objects that don't implement tp_traverse because
they cannot take part in cycles?
A significant majority of objects that can hold references to other
objects can take part in cycles and do implement tp_traverse. My
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
Is there any reason that you'd want to do this?
http://doublestar.org/python-hot-loading-prototype/
I have a relatively large application written in Python, and a
specific use case where it will significantly increase our
Am 26.10.2010 19:24, schrieb Peter Ingebretson:
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
Is there any reason that you'd want to do this?
http://doublestar.org/python-hot-loading-prototype/
I have a relatively large application written in Python, and a
specific use
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I think this then mandates a PEP; I'm -1 on the feature also.
I am happy to write up a PEP for this feature. I'll start that
process now, though if anyone feels that this idea has no chance of
acceptance please let me know.
Am 26.10.2010 22:28, schrieb Peter Ingebretson:
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I think this then mandates a PEP; I'm -1 on the feature also.
I am happy to write up a PEP for this feature. I'll start that
process now, though if anyone feels that this idea
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I think this then mandates a PEP; I'm -1 on the feature also.
I am happy to write up a PEP for this feature. I'll start that
process now, though if anyone feels that this idea has no chance of
acceptance please let me know.
Peter Ingebretson pinge...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am happy to write up a PEP for this feature. I'll start that
process now, though if anyone feels that this idea has no chance of
acceptance please let me know.
I think a feature that allows modules to be more reliability
reloaded could be
On 08:28 pm, pinge...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Martin v. L�wis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I think this then mandates a PEP; I'm -1 on the feature also.
I am happy to write up a PEP for this feature. I'll start that
process now, though if anyone feels that this idea has no chance
At 10:24 AM 10/26/2010 -0700, Peter Ingebretson wrote:
I have a relatively large application written in Python, and a
specific use case where it will significantly increase our speed
of iteration to be able to change and test modules without needing
to restart the application.
If all you
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, Neil Schemenauer n...@arctrix.com wrote:
I am happy to write up a PEP for this feature.
I'll start that process now, though if anyone
feels that this idea has no chance of
acceptance please let me know.
I think a feature that allows modules to be more
--- On Tue, 10/26/10, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
If all you really want this for is reloading, it would
probably make more sense to simply modify the existing class
and function objects using the reloaded values as a
template, then save the modified classes and functions back
to
I have a patch that adds a new function to the gc module. The gc.remap()
function uses the tp_traverse mechanism to find all references to any keys
in a provided mapping, and remaps these references in-place to instead point
to the value corresponding to each key.
The motivation for adding
16 matches
Mail list logo
