On Jun 26, 2011, at 05:02 AM, nick.coghlan wrote:
http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/9f7a0b4e38a7
changeset: 3889:9f7a0b4e38a7
user:Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
date:Sun Jun 26 13:02:17 2011 +1000
summary:
Record Guido's acceptance of PEP 380
files:
pep-0380.txt | 10
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:38 PM, ezio.melotti
python-check...@python.org wrote:
-.. [#] The exception is propagated to the invocation stack only if there is
no
- :keyword:`finally` clause that negates the exception.
+.. [#] The exception is propagated to the invocation stack unless
+
Hi Nick,
given I'm guilty for this patch, I'd reply :)
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 15:55, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:38 PM, ezio.melotti
python-check...@python.org wrote:
-.. [#] The exception is propagated to the invocation stack only if there is
no
-
Hello!
http://bugs.python.org/issue10403 is a documentation bug which talks
about using the term 'attribute' instead of the term 'member' when it
denotes the class attributes. Agreed.
But the discussion goes on to mention that,
Members and methods should just be attributes.
I find this bit
On 6/26/2011 2:52 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
http://bugs.python.org/issue10403 is a documentation bug which talks
about using the term 'attribute' instead of the term 'member' when it
denotes the class attributes. Agreed.
But the discussion goes on to mention that,
Members and methods should
Well it's not really layout, because alignment is handled by pack option. It
is how the field gets allocated. At this point I believe it will be more
complex to come up with custom allocation option, precisely because it's up
to each compiler to allocate the structure. Such flexibility will add a
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I gave my interpretation of the footnote at:
http://bugs.python.org/issue11669#msg139092 . Does this clarify it?
No, because while there *are* ways a finally clause can kill an
exception completely, reraising another
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
or the 'attribute' substitution everywhere makes sense?
No.
My strong history-based opinions ;-).
+1 to what Terry said.
Members is a historical relic that is best replaced by attributes
or data attributes if we want to
At 12:32 PM 6/25/2011 -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
So your proposed code would allow me, when writing a generator in
my code, do something that would allow me to yield up all the
values from an arbitrary generator I'm calling, over which I have
no control (ie: I can't modify its code)?
With a
