Phillip J. Eby schrieb:
At 04:33 PM 11/9/2005 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 11/9/05, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, while we're on this subject, can we make the optimization
options be part of the compile() interface? Right now the distutils has to
actually
Ulrich Berning schrieb:
[He already has a patch that does much of what is being discussed]
I have also introduced the new flag Py_NoZipImport that
can be activated with -Z at startup. This bypasses the
activation of zipimport
I think -Z could be confusing; I would expect it to work more like
There has been enough misunderstanding in this thread
that the summarizers are going to have trouble. So I'm
posting this draft in hopes of clarification; please correct
me.
(1) There is some pre-discussion attached to patches
1049855 and 1252236. Martin Loewis and Michiel
de Hoon agreed that
On 11/11/05, Ulrich Berning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido, if it was intentional to separate slightly different generated
bytecode into different files and if you have good reasons for doing
this, why have I never seen a .pyoo file :-)
Because -OO was an afterthought and not implemented by
I think this is an excellent summary of the discussion so far. Probably
clearer than my own posts.
Thanks, Jim!
--Michiel.
Jim Jewett wrote:
There has been enough misunderstanding in this thread
that the summarizers are going to have trouble. So I'm
posting this draft in hopes of
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Before trying to explain the reason, please try to explain the
problem first. What is it *really* that you want to do which
you feel you currently can't do?
Probably I should have started the discussion with this; sorry if I
confused everybody. But here it is:
I have
Jim Jewett wrote:
(6) Mark Hammond suggests that it might be easier to
replace the interactive portions of python based on the
code module. matplotlib suggests using ipython
instead of standard python for similar reasons.
If that is really the simplest answer (and telling users
which IDE
(6) Mark Hammond suggests that it might be easier to
replace the interactive portions of python based on the
code module. matplotlib suggests using ipython
instead of standard python for similar reasons.
If that is really the simplest answer (and telling users
which IDE to use is
Jim Jewett wrote:
really? Python comes with a module that makes it trivial to get
a fully working interpreter console ...
Using an event loop (or an external GUI) should not require
forking the entire interactive mode, no matter how trivial that
fork is.
repeating a bogus argument
Michiel 1) What if the user decides to import Tkinter next? Tkinter
Michielnotices that PyOS_InputHook is already set, and does not
Michielreset it to its own event loop. Hence, Tkinter's events are
Michielnot handled. Similarly, if a user imports Tkinter before my
Python's longstring facility is very useful, but unhappily breaks
indentation. I find myself writing code like
msg = ('From: %s\r\n'
+ 'To: %s\r\n'
+ 'Subject: Host failure report for %s\r\n'
+ 'Date: %s\r\n'
+ '\r\n'
+ '%s\r\n') %
Mixing Decimal and float is nearly ALWAYS a user error. Doing it correctly
requires significant expertise in the peculiarities of floating point
representations.
So that I think user should declare floats explicitly (###.###f) - he will fall
into float space only if
he wish it.
So Python
Avi Python's longstring facility is very useful, but unhappily breaks
Avi indentation. I find myself writing code like
Avi msg = ('From: %s\r\n'
Avi+ 'To: %s\r\n'
Avi+ 'Subject: Host failure report for %s\r\n'
Avi+ 'Date: %s\r\n'
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
The object isn't really destroyed. Simply ob_refcnt drops to zero,
then tp_dealloc is called, which is supposed to destroy it. But since I
wrote tp_dealloc, I choose not to destroy it,
Be aware that a C subclass of your wrapper that overrides
tp_dealloc is
Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
I have an extension module for scientific visualization. This extension
module opens one or more windows, in which plots can be made.
What sort of windows are these? Are you using an existing
GUI toolkit, or rolling your own?
For the graphics windows to
This sounds sort of like the situation that existed with sys.exitfunc
before the creation of the atexit module. Can't we develop an API
similar to that so that many different event-loop-wanting packages
can play nice together?
Greg I can't see how that would help. If the
16 matches
Mail list logo
