Hi Pablo,
Issue 43683 should not have been marked as a release blocker, as it is a
performance issue, not a bug.
The related bug (which was a release blocker) is
https://bugs.python.org/issue46009, and was fixed a while ago.
Cheers,
Mark.
On 04/01/2022 11:12 pm, Pablo Galindo Salgado wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am writing this to notify you that unfortunately the release of 3.11.0a4
is blocked as there are a bunch of release blockers
(some of them affect Python 3.10):
https://bugs.python.org/issue46263
https://bugs.python.org/issue46208
https://bugs.python.org/issue46006
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:57 PM Steven Troxler wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Thanks everyone for comments on our earlier thread [1] about callable type
> syntax. We now have a draft PEP [2] proposing an arrow-based syntax for
> callable types, for example:
>
> ```
> (int, str) -> bool #
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:24 AM Tal Einat wrote:
> I have a spare RPi zero that I could try to set up as a buildbot. Would
> that be useful?
>
No need. We've already got a 32-bit raspbian bot, adding another wouldn't
add value. The rpi0/1/2 are too slow to compile on anyways.
-gps
On Tue, Jan
Perhaps relevant for perspective:
We did some review of the pyperformance benchmarks based on how noisy they
are:
https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/discussions/142
Note that pidigits is the noisiest -- its performance changes up to 11% for
no good reason. The regex bms are also very noisy.
I have a spare RPi zero that I could try to set up as a buildbot. Would
that be useful?
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:59 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:40:25 -0800
> "Gregory P. Smith" wrote:
> >
> > rerunning a mere few of those in --rigorous mode for more runs does not
> >
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:40:25 -0800
"Gregory P. Smith" wrote:
>
> rerunning a mere few of those in --rigorous mode for more runs does not
> significantly improve the stddev so I'm not going to let that finish.
The one benchmark that is bigint-heavy is pidigits AFAIK, so you might
want to re-run
