On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:01:20 -0500, James Y Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, I'd like to see them be given a binding somewhere, and have
their claimed module agree with that, but am not particular as to
where. Option #2 seemed to be rejected last time, and option #1 was
given
James Y Knight wrote:
Sooo should (for 'generator' in objects that claim to be in
__builtins__ but aren't),
1) 'generator' be added to __builtins__
2) 'generator' be added to types.py and its __module__ be set to 'types'
3) 'generator' be added to newmodule.py and its __module__ be set to
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Other than a vague feeling of completeness is there any reason this
needs to be done? Is there anything useful that currently cannot be
expressed without this new module?
That I wonder myself, too.
Regards,
Martin
___
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 17:24, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Other than a vague feeling of completeness is there any reason this
needs to be done? Is there anything useful that currently cannot be
expressed without this new module?
That I wonder myself, too.
One
On Jan 27, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I agree. Because of the BDFL pronouncement, I cannot reject the patch,
but I won't accept it, either. So it seems that this patch will have
to sit in the SF tracker until either Guido processes it, or it is
withdrawn.
If people want to restart
