On 04/06/2016 06:43 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
I think typically the process for RESOLVED-FIXED (those
issues that were fixed by some kind of code change to
/trunk) issues is to:
* commit the change to a release build
* once the release build is out for testing, check that the
bug is fixed, and use
Hi all,
Are there other automated smoke test macros or scripts other than noted
below that can be ran on a built office to test basic functionality and
make sure nothing major is broken?
I found this wiki page [1] that references a sxw document that contains
macros and will display a report
inal Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 03:30
To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows
On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM,
On 01/30/2018 05:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
As I previously posted, the old TestLink instance is still alive but
NOT well on: http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/login.php?note=expired
referenced from the Apache OpenOffice QA information at:
On 01/31/2018 02:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org> wrote:
On 01/30/2018 05:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
As I previously posted, the old TestLink insta
Hi Matthias,
On 10/25/20 1:30 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
It would be interesting to run these tests on a build that does not show
the error message.
Regards,
Matthias
Next one without the error I will report on.
Thanks,
Carl
Am 25.10.20 um 16:57 schrieb Carl Marcum:
cc dev
cc dev@
I thought I'd try out the tests on Jim's test9 build from last night
that had the General Error thrown to see if it got picked up and it did.
Sometimes I'll get a few false failures or errors on different runs
(working on getting a list of them to fix) but it's usually 0 -2 so I'm
(Originally posted to dev and I forgot to cc this list)
Hi Damjan,
On 10/28/20 12:21 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately.
I have a few questions:
1. Is there anything
Hi All,
I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately.
I have a few questions:
1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests
provide vs.functionality?
2. Is there yet a place to list new cases it would good to add test for?
I think there is a lot
Hi All,
For those that run the automated tests after a build.
I wrote a Groovy macro to import the XML results from JUnit into Calc as
another option besides the HTML reports.
A short video on it's use and where to get it.
https://youtu.be/mpC6gNUuWCY
Please let me know if you have any
Welcome Marko,
Do you subscribe to the dev@ list also?
There is currently a VOTE in progress on a release candidate that we are
testing now that is running until tomorrow I believe.
If that's too soon there is other testing to be done soon as well as
other QA things to do.
Anyway welcome
Hi All,
cc'd qa@
I think it would be good to rework the test framework to not require
having just built the office.
Currently, to compile and run the tests, there are dependencies on
environment settings created and files built into main/solver/.
Mostly things like idlc, regmerge, and
Hi Keith,
On 6/20/21 9:10 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
On 2021-06-12 at 9:13, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
cc'd qa@
I think it would be good to rework the test framework to not require
having just built the office.
I believe that you are right. I know for myself, I do not have the capacity
Hi All,
Just an FYI I've been working on updating the JUnit library used in the
test suites for trunk.
Our current 4.10 is ten years old.
I'm doing this in two steps.
First step was the library update to 4.12 in commit 069226d [1]. The
only effect of this is users that have ran the
Hi All,
adding cc. dev@
On 5/31/21 3:05 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
Just an FYI I've been working on updating the JUnit library used in
the test suites for trunk.
Our current 4.10 is ten years old.
I'm doing this in two steps.
First step was the library update to 4.12 in commit 069226d
Hi All,
Since this is a rather large pull request based on many commits I want
to use lazy consensus here.
This PR-125 [1] is based on a lot of work by Damjan and a few others on
fixing flaky automated tests and other improvements that could be
back-ported to the 4.1 line.
Also included is
Hi All,
cc: dev@
Just an FYI on the status of my work on allowing the automated test
suites to compile and run tests without a working AOO build environment.
I've started a new branch standalone-test [1] with a README file
explaining the usage.
So far I've been able to run tests on CentOS 7
Hi João Paulo,
On 2/21/22 3:22 PM, João Paulo Carvalho wrote:
Hi!
My name is João Paulo, I'm Brazilian and I study computer science. I
have been using and recommending the Apache Open Office application
for some time. I would love to contribute to the testing and QA
community.
Regards,
João
Hi Czesław,
On 6/23/22 11:18 AM, Czesław Wolański wrote:
Hi all,
Bugzilla issue 128518 - Basic - Converting "+1" to a number
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128518
Regards,
Czesław
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi Lucien,
On 6/10/22 9:05 AM, Lucien Mathay wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry to seek help and at the same time report a strange
behaviour, for a problem on which I can not find the origin.
I have a strange behaviour in an OOBasic program, and to make it
simple I pruned down the question to the 12
Hi All,
On 6/10/22 9:30 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Lucien,
On 6/10/22 9:05 AM, Lucien Mathay wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry to seek help and at the same time report a strange
behaviour, for a problem on which I can not find the origin.
I have a strange behaviour in an OOBasic program, and to make
Hi Lucien,
On 6/6/22 12:51 PM, Lucien Mathay wrote:
Thank you Regina, but
if I add an 'endif' at the end of the line
( " if a = b then a=1 Else a=2 endif 'test "),
the compiler fails with the message "Syntax error : unexpectes symbol
: End If".
Furthermore, the book from "OpenOffice
).
Maybe Lucien can test/confirm the issue is solved?
@Lucien: What OS do you use?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 07.06.22 um 23:23 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi Matthias,
On 6/7/22 6:53 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
Am 07.06.22 um 00:59 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi Lucien,
On 6/6/22 12:51 PM, Lucien
Hi Czesław,
On 6/16/22 6:58 AM, Czesław Wolański wrote:
Hi,
The problem was reported yesterday on the English forum: topic "CINT("+1")
returns 0".
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=525249=0481325a63f94adf45c49ba4175701d7#p525249
In version 4.1.12, CLng("+1") returns 0
Hi Czesław,
On 6/16/22 6:58 AM, Czesław Wolański wrote:
Hi,
The problem was reported yesterday on the English forum: topic "CINT("+1")
returns 0".
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=525249=0481325a63f94adf45c49ba4175701d7#p525249
In version 4.1.12, CLng("+1") returns 0
Hi Matthias,
On 6/7/22 6:53 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
Am 07.06.22 um 00:59 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi Lucien,
On 6/6/22 12:51 PM, Lucien Mathay wrote:
Thank you Regina, but
if I add an 'endif' at the end of the line
( " if a = b then a=1 Else a=2 endif 'test "),
th
I guessed it was due to a change at some point.
Thanks for the link and all you do as well ;)
Best regards,
Carl
Regards,
Matthias
Am 18.10.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi All,
There was an UNO FVT test uno/sc/sheetSheetBasicTest that was timing
out and throwing an error due to an &qu
Hi All,
There was an UNO FVT test uno/sc/sheetSheetBasicTest that was timing out
and throwing an error due to an "Update Links" confirmation dialog that
was waiting on a response that never comes.
This test created a source Excel spreadsheet with a formula in a cell on
each of three sheets
28 matches
Mail list logo
