Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6

2013-10-18 Thread Peter Maydell
On 21 July 2013 13:52, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote: Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes: I'm pretty sure the latter is right (you only need code posted, not committed) -- can we fix whichever of the two pages is wrong, please? It depends on the definition of major.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6

2013-10-15 Thread Peter Maydell
On 21 July 2013 13:52, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote: Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes: I've just noticed that this is still inconsistent. That page says: Soft feature freeze. Major features should have initial code committed by this date. but it links to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6

2013-07-21 Thread Anthony Liguori
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes: On 15 July 2013 16:15, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote: Hard freeze is two weeks away. http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.6 I've just noticed that this is still inconsistent. That page says: Soft feature freeze. Major features should

Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6

2013-07-19 Thread Peter Maydell
On 15 July 2013 16:15, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote: Hard freeze is two weeks away. http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.6 I've just noticed that this is still inconsistent. That page says: Soft feature freeze. Major features should have initial code committed by this date. but it

[Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6

2013-07-15 Thread Anthony Liguori
Hard freeze is two weeks away. http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.6 Regards, Anthony Liguori