We are in the process of building a new website, I think you're right we
should simplify the roadmap page and communicate more on the binary release
date than on source code in our phrasing.
As for external communication, indeed many posts are launched individually
when source code is branched. I
Hi,
On Tue, 27. Feb 2024 at 09:39:23 +0100, Luca Manganelli via QGIS-Developer
wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> according to the QGIS roadmap, I see that the 3.34 LTR release is on 23th
> february, but on the site I see that the latest LTR is still 3.28
Quoting the website (right above the roadmap):
Hi Régis, Luca, list,
I think some of the confusion might be over the term of "Release". I
read this as release of the binaries, i.e. something we can download and
install from the QGIS website as a user. From what you said Luca, it
seems you view "Release" as release of the source code
Thank you for your response. Yes, I suggest you to indicate that the date
are only suggested.
See this example for LibreOffice:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
there's a column for the Freeze and one for Publishing, with a range of
dates and not a fixed day.
Il giorno mar 27
Hi Luca, as always, there is a delay between source code releases events,
and the packaging can only start, as per
https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html#release
QGIS website indicates that packaging is on its way.
Official communication including the changelog and
