Hi,
since the turn of the century, I invested a lot of time into some QL
hardware and software projects. Except the Q60 Graphics Card, all of
them actually worked, and have been shown to a few friends.
I didn't have the motivation to finish them. For a long time, the reason
was that I saw the
Hi Peter,
All of them, probably!
My first choice would probably be QLwIP and applications, to give the QL a
chance to get on the internet.
Second choice: I would really like the QLSD project to see the light of day.
Dilwyn Jones
Which project deserves a seat in the lifeboat? Which one
On 14/09/2013 13:53, Peter Graf wrote:
Hi,
since the turn of the century, I invested a lot of time into some QL
hardware and software projects. Except the Q60 Graphics Card, all of
them actually worked, and have been shown to a few friends.
I didn't have the motivation to finish them. For a
Q68
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:53:58 +0200
From: pg...@q40.de
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] A seat in the lifeboat?
Hi,
since the turn of the century, I invested a lot of time into some QL
hardware and software projects. Except the Q60 Graphics Card, all of
them actually
Malcolm Lear wrote:
I really like the idea of the Q68. Of all these options its the only
one I'd go out and buy. What sort of CPU speed are talking about and
will the FPGA design files be available to modify?
If I find the time to design suitable caches, I expect CPU core speed
between 32 and
-Original Message-
From: Peter Graf pg...@q40.de
Sent: Sep 14, 2013 8:53 AM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] A seat in the lifeboat?
Hi,
since the turn of the century, I invested a lot of time into some QL
hardware and software projects. Except the Q60 Graphics Card, all of
Ciao,
I vote 1st for Q68 and 2nd for QLwIP
Fabrizio
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
On 14/09/2013 15:41, Peter Graf wrote:
Malcolm Lear wrote:
I really like the idea of the Q68. Of all these options its the only
one I'd go out and buy. What sort of CPU speed are talking about and
will the FPGA design files be available to modify?
If I find the time to design suitable caches,
I will choose preferably, what noone else is able to finish.
SD card interafce can be created by someone else.
But complete new QL machine cannot be finished by everyone.
Then, I choose Q68 as no. 1 and QLwIP as no. 2.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On 14/09/13 13:53, Peter Graf wrote:
Hi,
since the turn of the century, I invested a lot of time into some QL
hardware and software projects. Except the Q60 Graphics Card, all of
them actually worked, and have been shown to a few friends.
I didn't have the motivation to finish them. For a long
I agree with Derek ... ;-)
Il giorno 14/set/2013, alle ore 20:53, Derek Stewart de...@q40.de ha
scritto:
On 14/09/13 13:53, Peter Graf wrote:
Hi,
since the turn of the century, I invested a lot of time into some QL
hardware and software projects. Except the Q60 Graphics Card, all of
In what state does QLwIP exist today? Could it be licensed under an open
source license?
If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I could
find help answering the question of hardware support. To my knowledge, no
known ethernet capable hardware support exists for any
Mark Martin wrote:
In what state does QLwIP exist today?
Undocumented and untouched for many years. Requiring QDOS Classic.
Could it be licensed under an open source license?
GPL planned.
If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I could
find help answering the
Peter Graf wrote:
If I find the time to design suitable caches, I expect CPU core speed
between 32 and 40 MHz. At 20 MHz, the Dhrystone benchmark gave something
between SuperGoldCard and Q40.
For the general public, I might hold back some design files until
expenses for manufacturing have
Mark Martin wrote:
Do you have a working 68K core with all the support chips?
The Q68 is a functional system on a finished PCB, actually running QDOS
Classic and Minerva.
What would
convince you to release that so that efforts could be made to port that to
inexpensive dev kits?
Sorry, I
Am 14.09.2013 23:47, schrieb Marcel Kilgus:
Peter Graf wrote:
If I find the time to design suitable caches, I expect CPU core speed
between 32 and 40 MHz. At 20 MHz, the Dhrystone benchmark gave something
between SuperGoldCard and Q40.
For the general public, I might hold back some design
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Peter Graf pg...@q40.de wrote:
Could it be licensed under an open source license?
GPL planned.
That's hopeful. What can I do to encourage or support that?
If the answer is no, I may be motivated to start an open project if I
could
find help answering
17 matches
Mail list logo