[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm ... not the tick tock ... :-)
Strange. Maybe your message too the long way around :o)
I suspect there's some data in the message headers we can use to find out - but
I'm not all that clued up on that part of emailing
CD's / DVD's / Downloads / Magazines,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where has Demon been hiding your email for the last month? It seems you
need a new ISP!
Nothing wrong with Demon, I've been using them for years and years and
years. I suspect Malcolm's clock is wrong as a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David
McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 17:47 +, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
David, you should raise more issues about the Q60 on this list.
No need to wait 2 years again ... :-(.
I don't have any Q60 issues any more. When no one could tell me
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniele Terdina
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
It is, in this respect just the same as LINUX. Peter can be a reseller
and give it away for free if he wants. We will not stop hi,
If I understand the licence correctly, resellers have to pay 10 euros to TT,
and I'm not
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
pgraf at q40.de wrote:
The registrar can at any time accept changes/additions/modifications
which are not distributed in source, but which may be essential. So
the SMSQ/E license does of course NOT provide this liberty. Instead, a
developer would depend on the mood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quite informative to see the SMSQ/E registrar shed some light on his
attitude regarding the importance of native OS support for TCP/IP and
ethernet. And a confirmation that I'd only get reasonable opportunities
for major QL hardware again, if the slow and painful
The 10 Euro fee to TT ended a while ago and we reduced the price
If that's the case, the licence on the official SMSQ/E web site should be
updated to current version.
Daniele
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
So when are you going to include George Gwilt's changes which enable SMSQE to
be assembled with QMAC or Gwass?
This will open up SMQE to other improvements which are needed.
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 09:00, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
On 20 Feb 2007 at 8:02, Roy wood wrote:
SMSQ/E is an open
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norman at Dunbar-it.co.uk wrote:
Steady Peter, steady :o)
Shouldn't your reminder better go to the one who started this myriad
programmers, personal note and talk is cheap stuff? o:-)
Actually, I meant to put 'steady everyone'. Apologies for 'picking' on you.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Duncan wrote:
Do you have any othe projects else up your sleeve?
Not absolutely impossible. But nothing major can happen until there's a
decent free QL OS. All reasonable ways I have to implement OS level code
for new hardware involve
On 20 Feb 2007 at 8:02, Roy wood wrote:
SMSQ/E is an open O/S. Anyone can have the code and anyone can make
changes to it so long as they
a) submit them to Wolfgang for vetting
b) ensure that the changes do not adversely affect other parts of the
O/S
c) can be made compatible with all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
On the other hand, SMSQ/E HAS progressed, thanks to Marcel, of course, but
not only him:
Bruno Coativy
Fabrizio Diversi
Phoebus Dokos
George Gwilt
Jerome Grimbert
John Hall
Marcel Kilgus
Mark Swift
That is
On 20 Feb 2007 at 9:19, Tony Firshman wrote:
Mark Swift
That is interesting. Isn't he the QDOS Classic man?
Idon't know - he gave persimsion to use his code to re/set the Qx0
cachemodes in SMSQ/E
Wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The registrar can at any time accept changes/additions/modifications
which are not distributed in source, but which may be essential. So the
SMSQ/E license does of course NOT provide this liberty. Instead, a
developer would depend on the mood of the registrar.
It is, in this respect just the same as LINUX. Peter can be a reseller
and give it away for free if he wants. We will not stop hi,
If I understand the licence correctly, resellers have to pay 10 euros to TT,
and I'm not sure whether there's also a fee for GD2 or other components, so
reseller
Where do i sign ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 16 February 2007 09:28
Neil Riley wrote:
GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
remove the mem card, excellent.
Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60
had
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 15:24 +0100, Bob Spelten wrote:
When I searched for the latest version of DBAS I got version 2.13 from the
Quanta librarian (Dec 2002) who told me YOU were the one that last
tinkered with it.
Does this mean you lost your own commented source code?
Not guilty! I never
At 23:01 18/02/2007 -0500, you wrote:
David Tubbs wrote:
NO I DID NOT ! ! ! ! ! !
At 19:30 15/02/2007 +, you wrote:
Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.
But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
laptop to a parallel printer? PC
David Tubbs wrote:
At 19:30 15/02/2007 +, you wrote:
Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.
But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't know the answer to that one,
EBAY can get you the answer to this
Op Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:58:22 +0100 schreef David McCann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One of the many reasons I have for preferring SuperBasic to XBasic is
the availability of dbas. But this is another project which got
abandoned. I may be out of date, but the last time I looked the version
supplied
I know that Dilwyn Jones has put most of the available documentation
on
his web site, which is easy to access.
http://homepages.tersco.net/dilwyn.jones/index.html
Errr, slight typo:
http://homepages.tesco.net/dilwyn.jones/index.html
The documentation is actually on the third of my 3 sites
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I know that Dilwyn Jones has put most of the available documentation
on
his web site, which is easy to access.
http://homepages.tersco.net/dilwyn.jones/index.html
Errr, slight typo:
Neil Riley wrote:
GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
remove the mem card, excellent.
Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60 had
already been prototyped and a free software to access it was
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:28:51 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Riley wrote:
GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
remove the mem card, excellent.
Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60 had
In a message dated 16/02/2007 09:49:30 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would sound brilliant - I for one would want to offer it for sale !!
I would want to buy one
Duncan
___
QL-Users Mailing List
In a message dated 16/02/2007 09:29:17 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60 had
already been prototyped and a free software to access it was already
written?
Peter
Do you have any othe projects else up
Duncan wrote:
Do you have any othe projects else up your sleeve?
Not absolutely impossible. But nothing major can happen until there's a
decent free QL OS. All reasonable ways I have to implement OS level code
for new hardware involve re-using free software and getting help from
persons that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Neil Riley wrote:
GoMMC, a RomDisq on steroids but with the opportunity to
remove the mem card, excellent.
Once again, Id buy one if developed for the QL.
How would it sound if a SD/MMC device for SuperGoldCard, Q40 and Q60 had
already
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roy wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], gwicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Those of us who went to the Sinclair show in Norwich a couple of years ago
had a very strong impression that the Spectrum has not moved on to the same
extent as the QL.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
David McCann wrote:
The QL no longer has enough users to make commercial products viable,
nor to produce enough programmers to support open-source products.
True, but why does nobody seem to see that it's possible to get help
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 23:02 +0100, Peter Graf wrote:
I don't think Richard gave up UQLX. Some other QL wheels also need to be
turned, so there may be different priorities. Usually, if you email him,
he sends you more recent code.
Then why is the old, uncompilable version still on his website, a
- Original Message -
From: Roy wood
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons
But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
SNIP
Both old and new users are stimulated by something new.
Repeating a list that I gave earlier - probably 3 item ranges will be
suited :
1 - £50 to £100 a card of some type, probably modular too, that most
people would have an interest in to add to their
- Original Message -
From: David McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons
To keep an old computer going you need a reasonable user-base and a
perceived function. The Spectrum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gwicks wrote:
Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.
But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't know the answer to that one,
but I do mainly because of my
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], gwicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Those of us who went to the Sinclair show in Norwich a couple of years ago
had a very strong impression that the Spectrum has not moved on to the same
extent as the QL. We saw stall after stall selling Spectrum hardware and
software
36 matches
Mail list logo
