Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread gdgqler
On 15 Mar 2011, at 03:33, Dave Park wrote: If the Goldfire were still possible today, it would be fantastic, but I suspect the Coldfire SoC is no longer available. I saw a manual for the Coldfire instructions and these can be assembled by GWASS. George

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Tony Firshman
gdgqler wrote, on 15/03/2011 10:30: On 15 Mar 2011, at 03:33, Dave Park wrote: If the Goldfire were still possible today, it would be fantastic, but I suspect the Coldfire SoC is no longer available. I saw a manual for the Coldfire instructions and these can be assembled by GWASS. It

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Dave Park
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Tony Firshman t...@firshman.co.uk wrote: gdgqler wrote, on 15/03/2011 10:30: On 15 Mar 2011, at 03:33, Dave Park wrote: If the Goldfire were still possible today, it would be fantastic, but I suspect the Coldfire SoC is no longer available. I saw a

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Geoff Wicks wrote: From then on the project faded from view. Can it be revived? I know very little about hardware, but I sense there is a new interest in native hardware and some projects that people thought would never come now seem feasible. It is for you hardware specialists to determine

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Lee Privett
That's a bit of a QLOAC Dagger statement :-) Lee - Back to the QL- Dilwyn Said To clarify what I mean I'll call it QL On A Chip or two. ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Dave Park
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.ukwrote: Geoff Wicks wrote: From then on the project faded from view. Can it be revived? I know very little about hardware, but I sense there is a new interest in native hardware and some projects that people thought

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Dave Park
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Geoff Wicks gtwi...@btinternet.comwrote: Sometime between 1998 and 2004 Nasta gave a talk at a North American show and I believe this is how Dave came into contact with him. I never met him in person, but we became good online friends. I met him through

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Mark Martin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Dave Park plasticu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.ukwrote: Geoff Wicks wrote: From then on the project faded from view. Can it be revived? I know very little about hardware, but I sense there is

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Dave Park wrote: Indeed an FPGA implementation of an m68k chip, or emulation of an n68k on some other lightweight chip are the only two economically sensible solutions. Actually, the cheapest solution would be to buy something like this http://mini-box.de/fr/catalog/il/1261 and use a thin

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Dave Park
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Marcel Kilgus ql-us...@mail.kilgus.netwrote: Dave Park wrote: Indeed an FPGA implementation of an m68k chip, or emulation of an n68k on some other lightweight chip are the only two economically sensible solutions. Actually, the cheapest solution would be

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Lee Privett
Wireless computer keyboards range from £9.99 to £99.9 some even with built in trackpads and rollerball (or dead mice as I like to call them. Its the form over function debate again, while nice to have a retro feel, its got to perform extremely well. For me the QL was the whole thing, the case

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Dave Park wrote: The catch is that the QL is much lower powered in terms of heat and current demands, and these PC-type boards do not fit that power envelope - therefore they can't be used embedded very easily. This board uses less than 20 Watts when idle (still less than 40 Watts in worst

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Dave Park
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Marcel Kilgus ql-us...@mail.kilgus.netwrote: Dave Park wrote: The catch is that the QL is much lower powered in terms of heat and current demands, and these PC-type boards do not fit that power envelope - therefore they can't be used embedded very easily.

Re: [Ql-Users] Yahoo Groups

2011-03-15 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message A5490AD5E2BE4271A8349E309D7508A2@mine5e8ac60903, Lee Privett lee.priv...@gmail.com writes Hi, QLC2 ... wouldn't be a bad name, for a new QL based computer/device. That's a bit of a QLOAC Dagger statement :-) Lee - Back to the QL- Dilwyn Said To clarify what I mean I'll call

[Ql-Users] New QL Hardware

2011-03-15 Thread Tobias Fröschle
All, when listening to all this (admittedly interesting) talks about possible revival of quasi-native QL hardware, the following questions should be answered: What is native QL hardware what did it make special 25 years ago what of this would we still want/need today 1. Had a Motorola 68k