Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-24 Thread Wolf
Hi, Maybe wrong, but at least the behavior was the same as on Minerva. Minerva allows this, at least with v1.63 to v1.98. So how does Minerva handle PRINT a$(6 to) or higher indices in that case? And if it conks out, how is 5 different from 6? I could have sworn that I tested it with

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-24 Thread Marcel Kilgus
That went out sooner than expected... Urs Koenig (QL) wrote: >> Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. >> >> You could write: >> >> a$="1243" >> PRINT a$(5 to) >> >> without any error, which was wrong. > Maybe wrong, but at least the behavior was the same as on Minerva. Minerva > allows

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-24 Thread Urs Koenig (QL)
Wolf wrote: > Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. > > You could write: > > a$="1243" > PRINT a$(5 to) > > without any error, which was wrong. Maybe wrong, but at least the behavior was the same as on Minerva. Minerva allows this, at least with v1.63 to v1.98. QDOS SuperBASIC (AH, JM, TB,

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-24 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Urs Koenig (QL) wrote: >> Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. >> >> You could write: >> >> a$="1243" >> PRINT a$(5 to) >> >> without any error, which was wrong. > Maybe wrong, but at least the behavior was the same as on Minerva. Minerva > allows this, at least with v1.63 to v1.98. I

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-23 Thread Fabrizio Diversi
Hi, what is the plan to release new SMSQmulator version ? The new functionality of IP Net support and new keyword JVA_QLSCREMU 4,_*x,y*_ looks extremely interesting. :-) Ciao Fabrizio On 22/01/2017 17:41, Wolf wrote: Hi all, Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. You could write:

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-23 Thread Jan Bredenbeek
On 22 January 2017 at 17:41, Wolf wrote: > Hi all, > > Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. > > You could write: > > a$="1243" > PRINT a$(5 to) > > without any error, which was wrong. > Is this really an error? You could simply return an empty string (as it does now).

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-22 Thread pjwitte
On 22/01/2017 22:02, pjwitte wrote: On 22/01/2017 17:41, Wolf wrote: <> The new version is at wlenerz.com/smsqe The "ready-to-go QXL.WIN file" appears still to be v3.27 although it is labelled SMSQE328B.win (Whats the B for?) Sorry, this turned out to be a mixup between my devs and my wins

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-22 Thread pjwitte
On 22/01/2017 17:41, Wolf wrote: <> The new version is at wlenerz.com/smsqe The "ready-to-go QXL.WIN file" appears still to be v3.27 although it is labelled SMSQE328B.win (Whats the B for?) Per ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-22 Thread Giorgio Garabello
Thanks wolf & Marcel!!! 2017-01-22 19:27 GMT+01:00 Peter Graf : > Wolf wrote: > > > Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. > > > > You could write: > > > > a$="1243" > > PRINT a$(5 to) > > > > without any error, which was wrong. > > > > The new version is at wlenerz.com/smsqe > >

Re: [Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-22 Thread Peter Graf
Wolf wrote: > Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. > > You could write: > > a$="1243" > PRINT a$(5 to) > > without any error, which was wrong. > > The new version is at wlenerz.com/smsqe Thanks for maintaining and announcing. All the best Peter

[Ql-Users] Smsqe 3.28

2017-01-22 Thread Wolf
Hi all, Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. You could write: a$="1243" PRINT a$(5 to) without any error, which was wrong. The new version is at wlenerz.com/smsqe Have fun Wolfgang ___ QL-Users Mailing List