Re: [ql-users] lost qpac settings

2002-04-17 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 03:22 ðì 17/4/2002, you wrote: Ok , Its what I do , today. Can PROG_USE contain more places than one ? or is there any other $PATH like variable ? There are two extensions that create devices called PTH (path) and DEV (device) which will do the trick... albeit not as good of elegant as DOS

Re: [ql-users] lost qpac settings

2002-04-17 Thread P Witte
Phoebus Dokos replies to Michael Grunditz: Can PROG_USE contain more places than one ? or is there any other $PATH like variable ? There are two extensions that create devices called PTH (path) and DEV (device) which will do the trick... albeit not as good of elegant as DOS or Un*x (I

[ql-users] lost qpac settings

2002-04-16 Thread Michael Grunditz
Hi Now and then , random, my qpac II or fileinfo settings are lost , It doesnt remember where my applications are , why ? /Michael

Re: [ql-users] lost qpac settings

2002-04-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Now and then , random, my qpac II or fileinfo settings are lost , It doesnt remember where my applications are , why ? I have a similar problem with Archivers Control Panel sometimes. The usual problem there is that some other program has changed the DATA_USE or PROG_USE default so the ACP is

Re: [ql-users] lost qpac settings

2002-04-16 Thread Michael Grunditz
Is it best to keep all utils in the same place ,directory ? /Michael In message 00de01c1e583$5460efc0$7b065cc3@default you wrote: Now and then , random, my qpac II or fileinfo settings are lost , It doesnt remember where my applications are , why ? I have a similar problem with

Re: [ql-users] lost qpac settings

2002-04-16 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 02:58 ðì 17/4/2002, Michael Grunditz wrote: Is it best to keep all utils in the same place ,directory ? /Michael I personally believe it's a good idea to try to keep them separate according to type... Less clutter... The filing facilities of SMSQ/E - QDOS are really limited and directory