-Original Message-
From: Tony Firshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Virus alert (No, not a hoax !)
I don't run M$ mail programs - that is the reason I don't spread them!
At work, I have no option - Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Dave Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers
I would be more than happy to make the DiscOVER sources available
Nice one Dave, I'd like to see the sources
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 at 21:15:15, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 12:02 AM 6/28/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Maybe Simon (N) Goodwin or Chas Dillon can shed some light into this?
They should know the status. I believe that most of the programs had a
time clause to them and are now owned by
Hi All,
I would concur with Tony - Freddy would certainly sue, all depends on if he
still actually owns the copyright or not, or they were indeed time limited and
have reverted to Simon et al as the authors.
Simon doesn't subscribe to this list, but I have forwarded this email to him for
Ahem, I *think I understood that :o)
Norman.
Norman Dunbar EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database/Unix administrator Phone: 0113 289 6265
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. Fax:0113 201 7265
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 05:42:26PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to suggest accessing unsupported filesystems by reading the
device as a stream, but seem to recall trying something similar in the
past and finding that because the partition it represents is a fixed
size (and
At 10:16 ðì 27/6/2001 +, you wrote:
Hi All,
I would concur with Tony - Freddy would certainly sue, all depends on if he
still actually owns the copyright or not, or they were indeed time limited
and
have reverted to Simon et al as the authors.
Simon doesn't subscribe to this list, but I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Q Branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Zidlicky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
there is no need to add the bloat of ISO9660 just to read a single QXL.WIN
Putting the QXL.WIN image directly on the CD is much cleaner and files
inside are
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
-Original Message-
From: Tony Firshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Virus alert (No, not a hoax !)
I don't run M$ mail programs - that
Nasta wrote:
Let's also remember that users that do not have a Q40/60 may also
want CD access. Not everyone has (or for that matter can have or wants)
Linux on their QL compatible hardware.
I think most of us are well aware of this. *If* a plain QDOS/SMSQ
CD-recording software gets written,
Richard Zidlicky wrote:
Afaic all publicly known specs about QXL filesystems are scattered
through UQLX, qxltool and qxl_fschk sources.
I think Gerhard Plavec has also put some information on his Austrian
QL site, address available on my 'ql links' page on my website
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL
IAn Interesting discussion this and some very good points raised by all.
I see, as usual that Thierry has his finger firmly on the pulse here and
is way ahead of most of us. When we discussed CD drivers at Eindhoven
last weekend we were suggesting that it be ported to the Qubide and that
a
Well, I hate to be a party breaker, but guess what: all standard CD file
systems have a deeper directory structure and/or longer names than the
QL
is capable of handling with it's 36 character path+name limit.
Wrong! ISO9660 is limited to 32 chars in filenames (path name included)
and to 8
At 10:13 PM 6/27/2001 -0400, Nasta wrote:
SCSI is another related example. A SCSI host adapter does nothing of
itself, but may have many different devices connected to it, that all
require treatment by essentially different drivers.
Just to expand on what Nasta said, different drivers (such as
15 matches
Mail list logo
