Tony Firshman makes some magical things to make me read
} Outside ones own country, IRCs have to be used which is 'payment' of a
} sort - but in stamps.
} Surely no problem with this?
Probably not any problem, as long as it does not appear on
the accounting system and thus leave no trace for
On 26 Mar 2002, at 8:58, Norman Dunbar wrote:
You have my approval. Hopefully, when you get sorted out, I'll be sending
off my IRC coupons for a CD and having my first look at the source code. Who
knows, I might be able to (a) understand it and (b) contribute.
Thanks for the approval.
I'll
On 25 Mar 2002, at 11:29, John Hall wrote:
Some hypothetical questions:
i) Would I be able to give away my modification(s) in source form
without including the official distribution sources?
ii) Would I be able to give away my modified version of SMSQ/E in
compiled form?
iii) Would
On 26 Mar 2002, at 10:42, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
QXL - Thierry Godefroy
Why not ? Although my programming efforts will be mainly turned towards the
Q60, now...
Well there doesn't seem to be anybody who knows the QXL as you
do (did?).
Aurora ?
SuperGoldCard ?
I got Aurora+SGC,
I have understood the bit about no charge in giving copies. As
someone
running a PD library I'll mention here I'm happy to adhere strictly
by
this.
I was surprised that media/post costs were vetoed I must admit.
Surely that is a bit of an imposition on the sender.
Not really, the circumstances
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:39:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed upon,
Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it:
In short:
Whilst Tony Tebby will retain copyright over the code, anyone may have a
copy of the
-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Source Code Status
This is a valid point. I propose we appoint designated copiers who have
agreed to copy
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Tony Firshman makes some magical things to make me read
} Outside ones own country, IRCs have to be used which is 'payment' of a
} sort - but in stamps.
} Surely no problem with this?
Probably not any problem,
In my area of the US nobody has any idea what IRCs are.
At 10:21 ðì 26/3/2002, you wrote:
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Tony Firshman makes some magical things to make me read
} Outside ones own country, IRCs have to be used which is 'payment' of a
} sort - but in stamps.
} Surely no problem with this?
Probably not any problem,
In my area of the US
On 26 Mar 2002, at 12:25, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
as far as I could understand the statements I am not sure whether it is
allowed to give away SMSQ in binary form (whether or not acompanied by
sources), can you please clarify this? This might be of great interest
for HW vendors who want
Wolfgang - Roughly how big are the entire source files in Kb/Mb? (Just
curious)
i don't have them yet...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang - Roughly how big are the entire source files in Kb/Mb? (Just
curious)
Rough values:
1800 source files.
2,5 MB zipped.
5,5 MB extracted.
Marcel
marcel wrote:-
Rough values:
1800 source files.
2,5 MB zipped.
5,5 MB extracted.
Marcel
Thanks Marcel.
Not a really big job then to make a few floppies for the distro, although a
CD/Superdisk/Zip disk would be a better alternative... Even the 2.5Mb
zipped file would fit split across two
In message 3C9EC61F.3028.A3898@localhost, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi all,
Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed upon,
Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it
BIG SNIP
:
Wolfgang
Well laid out and expressed Wolfgang. One thing you did not mention was
that a proportion
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:22:53PM +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
On 26 Mar 2002, at 12:25, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
as far as I could understand the statements I am not sure whether it is
allowed to give away SMSQ in binary form (whether or not acompanied by
sources), can you please
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 at 12:15:47, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The way IRCs work,it is evident to the sender as a notice is posted on
the return letter (when IRCs are used). (At least that's what happens
in Greece). This way you have an additional check on the distributor's
As one of the Pacific Time Zone QLer's, I get to be late to the
conversations, but at least I can have a try at the final word.
3/ No distribution of SMSQ/E may be SOLD, except for for the official
distribution.
This interdiction includes that of including and distibuting SMSQ/E in Public
On 25 Mar 2002, at 8:37, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
No need to twist my arms, I will gladly help.
Yippeee!
Yes, as long as you can redistribute the work to someone with the right platform, in
order to keep everybody going in the same direction, even if sometime
some platforms are a step
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
5/ Any person may make any change to the source code he feels like.
Any person may give away to others the modificaton he thus made,
including the official distribution in source code form only,
provided this is made ENTIRELY FOR FREE - no charges, not even
copying
Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed
upon,
Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it:
This is good news, a positive step forward. And having someone as
highly regarded as you in the QL world as registrar will be a popular
move I am sure.
I HOPE you can agree with this.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 at 15:29:17, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: 004001c1ce91$d33f3800$33065cc3@default)
Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed
upon,
Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it:
This is good news, a positive step forward. And having someone as
highly regarded as
On 18 Mar 2002, at 15:29, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
This is good news, a positive step forward. And having someone as
highly regarded as you in the QL world as registrar will be a popular
move I am sure.
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
I suspect you'll get more 'hate mail' for the length
Tony Firshman makes some magical things to make me read
} I have understood the bit about no charge in giving copies. As someone
} running a PD library I'll mention here I'm happy to adhere strictly by
} this.
} I was surprised that media/post costs were vetoed I must admit.
} Surely that is a
Hi all,
Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed upon,
Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it:
In short:
Whilst Tony Tebby will retain copyright over the code, anyone may have a
copy of the source code and modify it ang give it away for free.
There will also be an
[skipping a very long message]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] makes some magical things to make me read
} Thus I make a PLEA for volunteers. Obviously, for SMSQ/E running on QPC, Marcel
} KILGUS will be the key developer.
} For SMSQ/E on Q60/Q40, the obvious persons would be Claus and Peter GRAF (yes, I
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
