Re: [ql-users] Future of QL - Part 1E121 (I had to increment it ! ;-)

2002-01-15 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 14 Jan 2002, at 19:24, P Witte wrote: The actual words are: (QRM 6.4 10/08/95) NOTE: A0 should not be amended by the open routine. D0 must be set to the appropriate error code. (And my notes add: A6 should also be restored before exit.) Which is the same as saying that A0 should be

Re: [ql-users] Future of QL - Part 1E121 (I had to increment it ! ;-)

2002-01-15 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:16:25PM +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: On 13 Jan 2002, at 19:22, Richard Zidlicky wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:45:05AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote: NOT AT ALL !!! This is perfectly documented: the documentation for the IOSS (see the QDOS/SMS

Re: [ql-users] Future of QL - Part 1E121 (I had to increment it ! ;-)

2002-01-14 Thread P Witte
Wolfgang Lenerz writes: NOT AT ALL !!! This is perfectly documented: the documentation for the IOSS (see the QDOS/SMS reference manual) DOES says that A0 must stay unchanged or at least be restored if the device driver did not recognize its own device in the name during an open

Re: [ql-users] Future of QL - Part 1E121 (I had to increment it ! ;-)

2002-01-13 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:45:05AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote: NOT AT ALL !!! This is perfectly documented: the documentation for the IOSS (see the QDOS/SMS reference manual) DOES says that A0 must stay unchanged or at least be restored if the device driver did not recognize its own

Re: [ql-users] Future of QL - Part 1E121 (I had to increment it ! ;-)

2002-01-11 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
At 06:45 ðì 11/1/2002 +0100, you wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:04:59 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:00:33PM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote: No criticism whatsoever however just to satisfy my curiosity and with my limited knowledge, isn't the method you

Re: [ql-users] Future of QL - Part 1E121 (I had to increment it ! ;-)

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:00:33PM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote: I don't use the non-directory device driver IOT implement the CDROM device driver (which will indeed be a legal SMSQ/E directory device driver): I use a FAKE non-directory device driver so to intercept the long filename,