And what would Nasta say about this?
I could buy a kit and send it to him to look at it.
A remark for Bill: imho this 640x480 LCD does not have a lot in common
with the super LCD/plasma etc.. screens sold as TV sets nowadays: The
design is very old, there are different technologies, and the
John Gilpin wrote:
I thought I was monitoring (even if not responding to very much) the user
list fairly closely but I seem to have lost track of the proposed Norwich
Workshop originally planned for March I think. Has it died completely
or is it still on the agenda?
Still on for 6th
My son, 16, used to use the family PC, Athlon 1,8 GHz + 256 MB of
memory. It was not fast enough for his taste, and he wanted to have his
own environment so he got a Pentium 3GHz PC + 1 GB of memory (not from
me, from his mother, I wasn't aware of their plans...)
We share the ADSL line. He can
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 16:09:10 +0100, Arnould Nazarian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My son, 16, used to use the family PC, Athlon 1,8 GHz + 256 MB of
memory. It was not fast enough for his taste, and he wanted to have his
own environment so he got a Pentium 3GHz PC + 1 GB of memory (not from
me,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:47:38 +0100, Arnould Nazarian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And what would Nasta say about this?
I could buy a kit and send it to him to look at it.
A remark for Bill: imho this 640x480 LCD does not have a lot in common
with the super LCD/plasma etc.. screens sold as TV sets
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 at 16:09:10, Arnould Nazarian wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
My son, 16, used to use the family PC, Athlon 1,8 GHz + 256 MB of
memory. It was not fast enough for his taste, and he wanted to have his
own environment so he got a Pentium 3GHz PC + 1 GB of memory (not from
me,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 at 10:36:42,
=?iso-8859-7?B?IlBob2VidXMgUi4gRG9rb3MgKNbv3+Lv8iDRLiDN9Pzq7/IpIg==?=
wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 16:09:10 +0100, Arnould Nazarian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My son, 16, used to use the family PC, Athlon 1,8 GHz + 256 MB of
memory. It
Arnould Nazarian wrote:
My PC is so much under load because of this very basic application that
it reacts worse than my QL in 1984: it was a pain to type this text.
Hm, that's not really normal, an old 486 could easily handle this load
(I use a Pentium 233 as an internet router and its CPU
Arnould Nazarian wrote:
... all of it snipped ...
Arnould (and Tony),
I know you have always been looking for ways to have a QL device live in
the commercial world. Maybe there is a small opportunity here.
At the company I work for, we do a lot of automation. This means that
some things need
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], thegilpins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
While talking of workshops, will there be a Brighton/Hove Workshop this
year? If so, is there a planned date yet?
I would have organised this for February were it not for the London
show. I have been considering Mid to end of May
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arnould Nazarian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
It this bloody XP that is is responsible of this behavior.
I would say that it is more likely a bad installation, some application
running full tilt in the background using all the resources or hardware
problems. I have
- Original Message -
From: Tarquin Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Norwich Workshop
Still on for 6th November, which QL2004 organisers should be reminded.
Talking of QL2004 show(s) have bids closed for the possible UK venue?
I have noted this. Unfortunately we do
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 at 17:36:37, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Arnould Nazarian wrote:
... all of it snipped ...
Arnould (and Tony),
I know you have always been looking for ways to have a QL device live
in the commercial world. Maybe there is a small opportunity here.
I had a 640x400 Colour LCD screen bought for 20 USD a couple of months
ago. t's a Sharp EL unit (6) which was then converted to a VGA for a
friend's server using a nice diagram found on the net. I do not agree
that 640 x 480 x 16 is usable on a QL anymore :-) We have the colours
(even on
What you DO need is a DSL router (that will also save you the trouble of
using PPoE software installed at your machine)
Later, yes, I want to install a wifi router. But until later an ethernet
cable was cheaper.
Arnould
Phoebus
How have you this bad attitude to Linux? You have been listening to the
worng people. It is Windows that gives troubles.
About 5 years ago I bought a nice American distribution of Linux. About
50 Euros. It was a nighmare to install. But I did it within 2 weeks. I
could'nt have done it
Roy wood a écrit:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arnould Nazarian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
It this bloody XP that is is responsible of this behavior.
I would say that it is more likely a bad installation, some application
running full tilt in the background using all the resources or hardware
What do you think?
Joachim
The QL was developped for the mass market. Maybe there could be an
opportunity there again. Not without investments of course.
Arnould
Thanks for the info. I suggest that you speak personally to Roy Brereton
regarding QUANTA'S involvement with QL2004.
John G.
- Original Message -
From: Tarquin Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Norwich Workshop
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:07:32 +0100, Arnould Nazarian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I had a 640x400 Colour LCD screen bought for 20 USD a couple of months
ago. t's a Sharp EL unit (6) which was then converted to a VGA for a
friend's server using a nice diagram found on the net. I do not agree
that
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:07:32 +0100, Arnould Nazarian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I had a 640x400 Colour LCD screen bought for 20 USD a couple of months
ago. t's a Sharp EL unit (6) which was then converted to a VGA for a
friend's server using a nice diagram found on the net. I do not agree
that
21 matches
Mail list logo
