[ql-users] DataDesign

2004-10-08 Thread Claude Mourier 00
Now that (if I remember well) PROWess is open source what is the status of DataDesign ? Is the code available ? I wait for years for some upgrade of the products and think SMSQ needs a high quality standard database engine (some one preparded to port My SQL ?) Claude -Message

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Darren . Branagh
Brian, I wasn't being sarcastic at all, nor elitist. I thought the last DP released version was generally available as PD - I hadn't looked for it, as I was one of those who bought the entire DP collection of programs from freddy for about 100 quid just prior to DP closing down - so I already

Re: [ql-users] DataDesign

2004-10-08 Thread Jrme Grimbert
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: I wait for years for some upgrade of the products and think SMSQ needs a high quality standard database engine (some one preparded to port My SQL ?) I don't think so! My experience when talking with people about SuQcess, DBAS and working with a database on the QL

Re: [ql-users] Datadesign

2004-10-08 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 08/10/2004 10:34:56 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem as I said, is that the new version will not filter a database past the first stage. applying further filters simply applies a filter where nothing is selected. On inspection of the filter

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Tony Firshman
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 09:35:44, wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Brian, I wasn't being sarcastic at all, nor elitist. I thought the last DP released version was generally available as PD - I hadn't looked for it, as I was one of those who bought the entire DP collection of programs from

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Darren . Branagh
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:54:19 +0100,() [EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote: Oh... Sorry!! I had thought it was available, just the hi-res screen version that wasn't. Dilwyn - is it in your PD library?? If it isn't I would be glad to provide it :-) Phoebus _ I bet you would I have it

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. and Copyright

2004-10-08 Thread Darren . Branagh
John Sadler wrote:- Copyright was introduced so that the author could get a reasonable recompense for his/hers efforts. Of course when the lawyers have finished it all becomes unreasonable! However that does not change the moral ideas behind copyright. It seems totally unreasonable to me that

[ql-users] QL2004

2004-10-08 Thread sjefvdm
Dear QLers just a quick reminder QL2004 CELEBRATION OF 20th ANNIVERSARY OF THE SINCLAIR QL COMPUTER in Eindhoven/Netherlands on October 16th 2004 This meeting is entirely dedicated to the QL and SMSQ/E (but of course QDOS, Minerva, SMS2 and uQLx etc. are also

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Tony Firshman
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 11:32:06, wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) snip I recall when he got that Nissan 300ZX Turbo Sports car - bought entirely with DP proceeds. Indeed. Did he tell you the story? There were plenty of similar Nissans about with a slightly different names. This one was top of

Re: [ql-users] QL2004

2004-10-08 Thread Tony Firshman
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 12:43:37, wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) That was Sjef with mis-configured attribution! Dear QLers just a quick reminder QL2004 CELEBRATION OF 20th ANNIVERSARY OF THE SINCLAIR QL COMPUTER in Eindhoven/Netherlands on October 16th 2004

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: Brian Kemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection Im not quite sure if that was a sarcastic aside?? I thought it was a genuine observation. It seems to me that the QL WORLD is getting too elitist and forgetting the bottom of the heap, you

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Darren . Branagh
Tony wrote:- Did he tell you the story? There were plenty of similar Nissans about with a slightly different names. This one was top of the range and worth, at the time £22,000. He got it for £17,000 because the salesman thought it was the cheaper model. Were you there when he did wheelies

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. and Copyright

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moral copyright is all very well, until someone gets their solicitor onto you. Just because you're giving it away for free doesnt make it right. Mopral copyright is not very well - simply because what is moral to me isn't to you, or

Re: [ql-users] Datadesign

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 5:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (...) There are also quite a few problems with the machine code extensions provided by Datadesign, so far as I recall.. Like what? DD is used by me every (work)day and has been for ages. OK, so I use a house made prog to access the

Re: [ql-users] DataDesign

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 11:25, Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: (...) So porting MySQL might be a matter of personal challenge, but I can't see a real need. Seconded. There are more important issues... Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com

Re: [ql-users] DataDesign

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 10:30, Claude Mourier 00 wrote: Now that (if I remember well) PROWess is open source what is the status of DataDesign ? I frankly don't know (Joachim??), perhaps someone could check on his website? Is the code available ? I do have a copy of the code. I wait for years

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 8:36, Brian Kemmett wrote: The problem as I said, is that the new version will not filter a database past the first stage. applying further filters simply applies a filter where nothing is selected. On inspection of the filter screen from level 2 onwards just shows 'MEMO',

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 7 Oct 2004 at 21:12, gwicks wrote: Brian I can feel your frustration, but I not sure what you are talking about is elitism. I think it is just plain, damned inefficiency and muddle. Well, I do understand that those people who have given up the QL World just couldn't be bothered anymore.

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Tony Firshman
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 at 21:12:51, gwicks wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Brian Kemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection Im not quite sure if that was a sarcastic aside?? I thought it was a genuine observation. It seems to me that the QL

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Tony Firshman
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 13:39:55, wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Tony wrote:- Did he tell you the story? There were plenty of similar Nissans about with a slightly different names. This one was top of the range and worth, at the time £22,000. He got it for £17,000 because the salesman

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Darren . Branagh
Tony wrote:- Brian I can feel your frustration, but I not sure what you are talking about is elitism. I think it is just plain, damned inefficiency and muddle. Put another way the one thing you should never do in this life is to ask any QL-er to run a piss up in a brewery. Darren runs a very

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Brian Kemmett
Thanks for the advice Wolfgang. I am using the supplied front end. I sent for it from Roy Wood at Qbranch when I saw it advertised in the last issue of QLToday. Its advertised a high colour upgrade and the front end is version 4.12, whilst the engine is still v3.14. I have returned to using my

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Brian Kemmett
Darren, Just for the record, I also purchased Perfection (v3.10) from DP when it was released, and I still use it quite heavily. It is easy to use and fast. I have got very used to it, but with a high resolution display it isn't as it should be.. That is why I made my enquiry about its

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 15:31, Brian Kemmett wrote: (...) Its advertised a high colour upgrade and the front end is version 4.12, whilst the engine is still v3.14. I have returned to using my old version front end (v4.07) which works perfectly OK. I know it must be the front end at fault because

Re: [ql-users] test: PLEASE IGNORE

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 9:27, David Gilham wrote: this is a test please ignore done. grin Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm

[ql-users] Perfection: my take on it

2004-10-08 Thread David Gilham
I seem to have problems posting to the list but here is my understanding of the Perfection situation. I made an agreement with Freddy Vaccha aka digital precison to upgrade perfection and possibly to release it as freeware. I have made it work with larger screens and possibly on the ql emulator

Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 9:44, David Gilham wrote: (...) . For what its worth Perfection has not been released as freeware or public domain and I would need permission from Freddy Vaccha to relase the binary let alone the sources to the general QL community. Hmm, Darren stated: Freddy gave

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Kemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Darren, Just for the record, I also purchased Perfection (v3.10) from DP when it was released, and I still use it quite heavily. It is easy to use and fast. I have got very used to it, but with a high resolution display it

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Brian, I wasn't being sarcastic at all, nor elitist. I thought the last DP released version was generally available as PD - I hadn't looked for it, as I was one of those who bought the entire DP collection of programs from freddy for about

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Marcel Kilgus
gwicks wrote: A more recent case is EasyPtr. You cannot use this with the new colours. I just came off the phone with Albin. In the course of the conversation we recognised that we would have met tomorrow anyway at a wedding of a mutual friend, so I will have some time to talk to him and sort

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Were you there when he did wheelies around a car park after a QL show - Leyland I think - soon after he got the car? I remember wheelies around the Leyland car park - it was same night that I got a flat battery in my old Ford Crapi (as Freddy used to call it). I think it might have been the same

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. and Copyright

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
On 8 Oct 2004 at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moral copyright is all very well, until someone gets their solicitor onto you. Just because you're giving it away for free doesnt make it right. Mopral copyright is not very well - simply because what is moral to me isn't to you, or

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Darren runs a very good piss-up (sorry QL show) form time to time (8-)# ^ | --- Not much of that there after all the dark stuff from Mr G. in

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I couldn't manage one this year - as my son took priority!! I only see him on weekends, as I have to work in Dublin, and it would have meant giving up one of my weekends with him for the Show. I handed in my resignation lately to the bank where I've worked for 7 years, purely 'cos I miss him

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
That was probably Bernd Reinhardt then. I'll come with him to QL2004. OK, s we know what HE'll be doing on that day...:-) Wolfgang He he, I feel a Data Design workshop coming on at QL2004. Either that, or lock Bernd in a room by himself not to come out until it's sorted! -- Dilwyn Jones

[ql-users] EasyPtr

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Uhlig
Marcel wrote: just came off the phone with Albin. In the course of the conversation we recognised that we would have met tomorrow anyway at a wedding of a mutual friend, so I will have some time to talk to him and sort this out. Any requests, suggestions? Make him rewrite EasyPtr... :-))) or

Re: [ql-users] DataDesign

2004-10-08 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Jérôme Grimbert wrote: Moreover, MySQL's views currently suck... If you really need SQL power, you should consider PostgreSQL. And then, even a big Q60 would not be enough. Then it starts to get tricky. As open source DB's go, I would vote for Firebird. I am sure Fred Toussi would agree on this

Re: [ql-users] Datadesign status

2004-10-08 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: 1 - the engine itself. this is what actually handles the data. This is in a file called engine_rext which has to be LRESPR'd. 2 - A frontend program. This can be used to build and maintain simple databases. I think it is simply called Datadesign. It's an executable prog. 3

Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it

2004-10-08 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: David Gilham Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it My understanding is that I need freddies permission to release the modified binary to the general QL communinity and that I am under a Non disclosure arregement as regards the sources.I seem To

Re: [ql-users] Perfection

2004-10-08 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: Malcolm Cadman ( For info : Mark was previously a regular member of the London Quanta Group ) I gathered that at present he is no longer programming, but now involved in live public events where he does readings, etc. So his interest has moved to the

Re: [ql-users] QL2004 (Wrong date?? - Strictly off topic)

2004-10-08 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ql-users] QL2004 Dear QLers just a quick reminder QL2004 CELEBRATION OF 20th ANNIVERSARY OF THE SINCLAIR QL COMPUTER in Eindhoven/Netherlands on October 16th 2004 My apologies to all but we

Re: [ql-users] Datadesign status

2004-10-08 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joachim Van der Auwera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes On april 14, I sent an email to both Roy Wood and Rich Mellor with all the sources for PROGS' QL software (well, not quite sure whether sources for The PAINTER and other old stuff was included). Basically a large

Re: [ql-users] Datadesign

2004-10-08 Thread Roy wood
I have been made aware of the filter problem recently and have passed on the comments Bernd who currently updates the software. We have recently released the High Colour version as an upgrade. -- Roy Wood Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill, Portslade, Sussex.BN41 2LB Tel: +44 (0) 1273 386030fax: +44

Re: [ql-users] Datadesign status

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 20:50, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote: (...) Parts 1 and 3 have been open source for a couple of years now. That's what I thought. I has no reaction (which is no comment, just an observation). (...) Some thoughts and comments. - The DATAdesign frontend was originally

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. and Copyright

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 18:34, Dilwyn Jones wrote: And just imagine the field days lawyers would have if they'd had to plead whether something was moral or not. Shudder. Wolfgang I thought you were a lawyer, Wolfgang? yup. Or is that what you meant??? Well... Wolfgang

Re: [ql-users] QL2004 (Wrong date?? - Strictly off topic)

2004-10-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Oct 2004 at 19:48, gwicks wrote: On Sunday it is the opening of the kiss season in Amsterdam. The intiative comes from the cultural centre De Balie who say Amsterdammers should increase love in the city by kissing more in the street. The programme organiser, Lisa Boersen, says

Re: [ql-users] Datadesign status

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: 1 - the engine itself. this is what actually handles the data. This is in a file called engine_rext which has to be LRESPR'd. 2 - A frontend program. This can be used to build and maintain simple databases. I think it is simply called Datadesign. It's an

Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I'll put an appeal in the next issue of Toady to see if anyone knows of is whereabouts these days. Dilwyn Jones - Original Message - From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it -

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
A more recent case is EasyPtr. You cannot use this with the new colours. I just came off the phone with Albin. In the course of the conversation we recognised that we would have met tomorrow anyway at a wedding of a mutual friend, so I will have some time to talk to him and sort this

Re: [ql-users] QL2004 (Wrong date?? - Strictly off topic)

2004-10-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
But then, we in the QL World are always in favour of the KISS principle, anyway. Wolfgang Keep It SmSqe? -- Dilwyn Jones ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm

RE: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it

2004-10-08 Thread Duncan Neithercut
Yes at last some sense about copyright ; one of 3 major topics that are stifling QL viability. If David Gilham is willing to release his work as freeware he and others honesty believe and with reasonable justification i.e. emails, or letters or well recalled conversations that Freddie Vaccha

Re: [ql-users] EasyPtr

2004-10-08 Thread Franois Van Emelen
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: Marcel wrote: just came off the phone with Albin. In the course of the conversation we recognised that we would have met tomorrow anyway at a wedding of a mutual friend, so I will have some time to talk to him and sort this out. Any requests, suggestions? Make him rewrite

Re: [ql-users] EasyPtr

2004-10-08 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: Make him rewrite EasyPtr... :-))) Not going to happen. He said if he were retired he'd probably do something, but as it is, he isn't and has enough paying things to do. Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [ql-users] Perfection etc. etc.

2004-10-08 Thread Marcel Kilgus
gwicks wrote: Thanks Marcel. I think we need to know he would agree to a wider distribution of your version of EasyPtr. We would have to decide if this should be a charged or an free upgrade. (My feeling is that it is a significant upgrade and therefore should be charged, but then you would