Yes, you get drunks and a few fights, but nothing like you get over here. (And
that's only the QL shows)
Are the fights because the pubs are ... licenced ?
(how's that for getting back on topic?)
Wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 00:31:09, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will recognise
it. I too met him again recently and he formally gave the cloth to me!
I didn't know you had 'taken the cloth' I must treat you with a new
reverence!
I
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 08:39:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 00:31:09, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will recognise
it. I too met him again recently and he formally gave the cloth to me!
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:50:45 +0100,() Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 08:39:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 00:31:09, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 16:20:59, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Not even a tablecloth with a pint on it?
Now that is more like it.
I have certainly done that with the green tablecloth - the stains are
there to prove it.
Tony
I can stand testament to that one!!
I remember
Rich Mellor wrote:
David Batty and Sector Software are still around - see:
_http://www.sectorsoftware.demon.co.uk/address.htm_
(http://www.sectorsoftware.demon.co.uk/address.htm)
email address:
_accordion AT sectorsoftware.demon.co.uk_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Which reminds
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 at 13:39:36, wrote:
(ref:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
We were stood outside talking about old times (he used to sell some of
my software many years ago), and as he opened the boot of his car, what
did I see in there...Accordions. Apparently he's quite into them!
For new readers he
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 at 20:35:00, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can best
make progress by
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In a message dated 11/10/2004 20:54:30 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can best
make progress by contacting Dave Batty, who took over the complete
Digital Precision
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can
best
make progress by contacting Dave Batty, who took over the complete
Digital Precision software catalogue.
Contacting Freddie Vachha seems more of an unknown.
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
The Membership databases from Quanta have a number of possible contact
addresses both snail and email BUT would I
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 at 20:57:47, John Sadler wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
The Membership databases from Quanta
The Membership databases from Quanta have a number of possible contact
addresses both snail and email BUT would I be contravening the Data
Protection Act by revealing the same?
John Gilpin,
Quanta Membership Secretary.
Not if they have given their express permission
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 at 20:57:47, John Sadler wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will recognise
it. I too met him again recently and he formally gave the cloth to me!
I didn't know you had 'taken the cloth' I must treat you with a new
reverence!
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill, Portslade, Sussex.BN41 2LB
Tel: +44 (0)
At 23:10 12/10/2004 +0100, you wrote:
So, if they are so easy to find, what is all this topic about?
It is obvious that Quanta's help is not required (again) :-(
John Gilpin.
Goodness, what planet
If you had wanted to help and maintain confidentiality you would surely
have sent an email
Dave Gilham wrote:-
My understanding is that I need freddies permission to release the
modified binary to the general QL communinity and that I am under a
Non disclosure arregement as regards the sources.I seem To have lost that
agreement but that is the gist of of it. By the way does freddy
H.
Now I'm confused.
I was told by Mark years ago that Freddy gave the OK for Perfection to be
released as freeware. So, providing you (Dave) are OK about releasing any
of your modifications on the public, I don't see what the problem is.
Cheers,
Darren Branagh,
Bank of Ireland -
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 at 20:35:00, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can best
make progress by contacting Dave Batty, who took over the complete
Digital Precision
On 8 Oct 2004 at 9:44, David Gilham wrote:
(...)
. For what its worth Perfection has not been released as
freeware or public domain and I would need permission from Freddy Vaccha
to relase the binary let alone the sources to the general QL community.
Hmm, Darren stated:
Freddy gave
- Original Message -
From: David Gilham
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
My understanding is that I need freddies permission to release the
modified binary to the general QL communinity and that I am under a
Non disclosure arregement as regards the sources.I seem
I'll put an appeal in the next issue of Toady to see if anyone knows
of is whereabouts these days.
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take
]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
On 8 Oct 2004 at 9:44, David Gilham wrote:
(...)
. For what its worth Perfection has not been released as
freeware or public domain and I would need permission from Freddy Vaccha
to relase the binary let alone the sources to the general QL
23 matches
Mail list logo
